Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4887 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I play at a 9 hole course very often but the scorecard is laid out as if it is an 18 hole course.  The 9th hole (on what the scorecard considers the front nine) has a handicap of 18, however on the back nine (9th hole again) it has a handicap rating of 13.  Why would it not be 17?  All the front nine holes are even handicaps, and the back nine are odd numbers.  Maybe I'm looking to far into this but shouldn't the same hole play the same difficulty?


Posted

Very interesting......

I have no idea!   My only thought is when it was rated......that maybe a different set of tees were intended for play the 2nd time around?

What's in Paul's Bag:
- Callaway Big Bertha Alpha Driver
- Big Bertha Alpha 815 3-wood
- Callaway Razr Fit 5-wood
- Callaway Big Bertha 4-5 Rescue Clubs
-- Mizuno Mx-25 six iron-gap wedge
- Mizuno Mp-T4 56degree SW
- Mizuno Mp-T11 60degree SW
- Putter- Ping Cadence Ketsch


Posted
Originally Posted by Motown88

All the front nine holes are even handicaps, and the back nine are odd numbers.

Should be the other way around.

In my bag ... 12 year old Balvenie DoubleWood


Posted
Originally Posted by WWBDD

Should be the other way around.

Should it?  I've never paid enough attention on 9 hole courses, and to be honest this is the only 9 hole course I play.

Originally Posted by BuckeyeNut

Very interesting......

I have no idea!   My only thought is when it was rated......that maybe a different set of tees were intended for play the 2nd time around?

That was my first thought, but the yardage for each hole is the exact same and thus why I stated it's the exact same hole.  I understand that over the course of hundred of thousands of rounds from a scratch golfer the holes may have varying average scores.  I believe this to be the reasoning that they have differing handicap ratings.


Posted
Originally Posted by Motown88

Should it?  I've never paid enough attention on 9 hole courses, and to be honest this is the only 9 hole course I play.

That was my first thought, but the yardage for each hole is the exact same and thus why I stated it's the exact same hole.  I understand that over the course of hundred of thousands of rounds from a scratch golfer the holes may have varying average scores.  I believe this to be the reasoning that they have differing handicap ratings.

The purpose of the handicap numbers on the holes is not to indicate the difficulty of the hole* but to apportion handicap strokes when playing a match.  Think about what would happen if the holes were given handicap numbers 2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18 for both (identical) nines.  Someone playing to a 3 is playing a scratch golfer.  He should get three strokes.  What holes does he get them on?  On the front none he gets a stroke on the #2 handicap hole and on the back none he gets a stroke on the #2 hole.  And thereby gets cheated out of one of the three strokes he is entitled to.  If you play 18 holes, even if it is the same 9 twice, you need to have handicap numbers of 1-18.  Hence the workaround the 9-hole course uses.  Does that help with the reasoning?

* while we generally think of the handicap ratings as measures of difficulty, I believe that under the USGA guidelines they should ranked in order based on the difference in relative difficulty a scratch golfer would experience compared to a bogey golfer (which terms have specific meanings in the USGA HAndicap Manual) .  This frequently translates into absolute difficulty but doesn;t have to.

The following link explains how the USGA recommends that handicap strokes be allocated:

http://www.usga.org/HandicapFAQ/handicap_answer.asp?FAQidx=25

And yes, according to the USGA the front nine should be the odd numbers and the back nine should be the even numbers.  And the low number handicap holes should be allocated towards the middle of the nine, not the beginning or end.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by turtleback

The purpose of the handicap numbers on the holes is not to indicate the difficulty of the hole* but to apportion handicap strokes when playing a match.  Think about what would happen if the holes were given handicap numbers 2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18 for both (identical) nines.  Someone playing to a 3 is playing a scratch golfer.  He should get three strokes.  What holes does he get them on?  On the front none he gets a stroke on the #2 handicap hole and on the back none he gets a stroke on the #2 hole.  And thereby gets cheated out of one of the three strokes he is entitled to.  If you play 18 holes, even if it is the same 9 twice, you need to have handicap numbers of 1-18.  Hence the workaround the 9-hole course uses.  Does that help with the reasoning?

I don't think the OP's issue is with the holes not having identical handicap numbers, since that's obviously problematic, but that the same hole is not in the same relative position in the two 9s. The "obvious" way to fix it would be as the OP suggested, where the 17th and 18th handicap holes would be the same. (i.e., 1st is also 2nd, 3rd is also 4th, etc.)

The strange thing is that the same hole is 13th and 18th. That means they've scrambled the ordering between the front and back 9s.

Originally Posted by turtleback

And yes, according to the USGA the front nine should be the odd numbers and the back nine should be the even numbers.  And the low number handicap holes should be allocated towards the middle of the nine, not the beginning or end

I think your last sentence here is probably the reason: putting the 9th hole as the 17th handicap hole is not consistent with the suggested ordering of the handicap numbers. While I don't completely agree with the rationale for the ordering, that is what they want, so holes near the middle of the 18 would be expected to have lower numbers.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Note: This thread is 4887 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,660 4/6* ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟨⬜🟨⬜🟩 ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Day 1: 2026.01.03 Played 18 at Cape Kidnappers. Getting back into it after a few days off. Mixed results.
    • Day 40: short range session. Worked on my drill mostly. Finished with some full swings and driver swings. Range was packed because it was so nice out. Solid session though. 
    • Day 5, 1/3/26.  Today was a weird day schedule-wise, but I did find 15 minutes to hit 6-iron shots (indoors, off a mat, into a net).  I also got to thinking about yesterday's round and, other than a few thin shots (that I think were weather/grip related), I didn't have any wild non-driver shots, which was weird for me.  I need to get back to video, which is tough in my setup. Also, this wouldn't count on its own, but anyone reading this and thinking about doing their own 5 minutes daily, check out Fit for Golf's latest podcast episode.  It's only a few minutes and Mike does a great job talking about the importance of doing a bit each day.  That also reminded me, I let my FFG subscription lapse, I'm going to renew it.
    • Day 32 (3 Jan 26) - Misty, rainy day - opted to rehearse swing in the mirror - focused on face position at P6 thru P9.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.