Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Ball stuck in its own pitch mark


Note: This thread is 4661 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well, looking at Rule 24 in the current book i see no mention of 'dropping a ball on the green', as you suggest.  Considering Rule 24-2, ii, 'Immovable obstruction in a bunker', if that is a reference you offer as evidence, i just don't see it in the book. Remotely possible when moving backwards as desired from immov obstruction to find a nearby green in which to 'drop' but i don't think that idea is good either. And when you state 'most of the time' do you mean 51% or 99.99% of the time?


Posted
Originally Posted by Dormie1360

Hey Rulesman,

I'm guessing you missed this in my answer...........I get very wordy.        I doubt you are implying relief was available for lie only.  I called it an "exception" which probably isn't the best choice of words.  Just so there is no confusion for others, the player is entitled to his original lie AND line of play.

I just quoted the decision which doesn't mention line of play.


Posted
Originally Posted by joekelly

Well, looking at Rule 24 in the current book i see no mention of 'dropping a ball on the green', as you suggest.  Considering Rule 24-2, ii, 'Immovable obstruction in a bunker', if that is a reference you offer as evidence, i just don't see it in the book.

Yes, specifically Rule 24-2b (ii) (b)

Remotely possible when moving backwards as desired from immov obstruction to find a nearby green in which to 'drop' but i don't think that idea is good either.

Hey, don't shoot the messenger, under the rules it is an option when proceeding under the Rule 24-2b (ii) (b)

Keep in mind when you do drop under the above rule, or the others that i mentioned, if  the drop is on a wrong putting green (not the green on the hole that you are playing), you then would proceed under R25-3 Wrong putting green. If it's on the hole that you were playing, after the drop you would then do the normal mark, lift, clean, and then place.

And when you state 'most of the time' do you mean 51% or 99.99% of the time?

The latter.  You'll occasionally see a drop from a water hazard on the green, the others are pretty rare.

Regards,

John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4661 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.