Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Strike One

Head weight versus distance

10 posts in this topic

When I recently took up golf again following a lengthly hiatus, I was generously given a couple of slightly used Burner drivers. The thing I noticed most of all was how light the heads were. I had trouble adjusting to the feel of these clubs.

It was explained to me that the manufacturers design drivers primarily for distance, which means head speed. I assume the thinking is that the average golfer can increase the head speed of his driver if there is less mass to accelerate.

I can't argue with the marketing, but for me it didn't work. The obvious fix was to add a little weight to the head, which I did.

I took both drivers out to the range yesterday to see which one hit longer. I was curious to see how the added weight effected my distance. It was close, but the added weight increased my distance by about 10-20 yards.

This got me thinking about the physics involved. A heavier mass traveling at the same speed is going to impart more energy to the ball than a lighter mass. My swing speed is primarily governed by my ability to rotate my body and generate torque. A few extra grams on the end of the shaft isn't going to slow things down much, but it will impart more energy..

Therefore, it only makes sense to use the heaviest head I can swing comfortably. I just wonder how it effects the dynamics of the shaft.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Most likely you were able to connect closer to the sweet spot more often with the heavier head.  With a lighter swingweight some people can have issues delivering the clubhead to the ball accurately - I think basically the brain has trouble perceiving where the club head is.  I find I can't hit my driver well without a swingweight of at least D0.  Some people like it around C5 (very light), some people like it really heavy like a wedge (my brother likes D6 for his driver, to me it feels like a piece of concrete on a stick).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That may be so. The swing is all about timing, so maybe that's part of it too.

Kinetic energy is calculated using the formula: KE = 1/2 mass x velocity squared. Momentum (P) is calculated with P = Mass x Velocity.

A small change in velocity creates a large increase in Kinetic energy. A small increase in mass has little effect with respect to KE.

However, a small change in mass has much more effect with regards to momentum.

The question is: which has more effect imparting energy to the ball, kinetic energy or momentum?

My guess, from a purely physics perspective, would be KE. A higher club head speed would impart far more energy to the ball. Nevertheless, we have to think about what is happening to the ball at the point of impact. It's getting squished and accelerated.

At the point of contact, a lighter head will decelerate at a faster rate than a heavier head. The heavier head maintains greater velocity until the ball leaves the face. This means the ball probably spends a little more time on the face of the heavier club, where it develops a greater amount of deformity and has more time to gain energy and accelerate.

Then again, the amount of increased KE from the lighter head may do the same thing.

Interesting to think about anyway.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats where you have to ask yourself what is better: higher clubhead speed or the added force that a heavier clubhead adds to the ball.  In the case of some drivers, the headweight is the same but the weight savings come in the shaft and grip.  I know that in the instance of Cleveland's 290 and 270 drivers, that is the case.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The basic equation is

 
  m1
	v2 = ----------------  (1 + e)   u1
		m1 + m 2
 

where m1 is mass of club, m2 is the ball, e is cofficient of restitution, and u1 is the velocity of the club. A golf ball is ~45 grams. The difference between a 200 gm clubhead and a 400gm would be about 10%.  Now the tricky part is that no one can tell you how the club head speed will differ between those clubs. Some guys can swing lighter clubs faster. Other guys struggle to swing confidently with them because they can't feel the clubhead.

Originally Posted by GaijinGolfer

Thats where you have to ask yourself what is better: higher clubhead speed or the added force that a heavier clubhead adds to the ball.  In the case of some drivers, the headweight is the same but the weight savings come in the shaft and grip.  I know that in the instance of Cleveland's 290 and 270 drivers, that is the case.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by x129

The basic equation is

m1v2 = ---------------- (1 + e) u1m1 + m 2

where m1 is mass of club, m2 is the ball, e is cofficient of restitution, and u1 is the velocity of the club. A golf ball is ~45 grams. The difference between a 200 gm clubhead and a 400gm would be about 10%.  Now the tricky part is that no one can tell you how the club head speed will differ between those clubs. Some guys can swing lighter clubs faster. Other guys struggle to swing confidently with them because they can't feel the clubhead.


Be careful when you start talking about feel though because for the most part, feel isnt real.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm dredging up this topic because I have a unique issue...

I have a Callaway Diablo 9.5 driver with a ProjX Stiff shaft.  I hit it well averaging about 230-240.

However, My fairway is a Titleist 909F3 13* w/ a Adila VooDoo Stiff that I can drive almost as far as the driver!  It has a heavier feel at the head and a better tempo - I perceive the timing with the heavier head coming through the ball with more force at release.

So I'm wondering if I'm leaving yardage off the driver because it is so light?  Can a driver be modded to a heavier head-weight or is this a function of the shaft?

TIA

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It could also be that your launch conditions are better with a bit more loft. I'd see a fitter if I were you.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thanks Erik - went to the fitter and he checked the clubs: Driver is a D5 and Fairway is a D0.  He said to demo a loftier driver as you suspected...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Erik - went to the fitter and he checked the clubs: Driver is a D5 and Fairway is a D0.  He said to demo a loftier driver as you suspected...

Sweet. Glad you were able to get some good information (from the fitter - my post was just a hunch).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • These are myths that I hear a lot. Some are just eye rolling trivia but some can hurt. 1. Tour pros continuously vary their shot shape based on hole demand. Not true. They have one predominant shot shape they play almost all the time. Only when in jail or extreme condition do they actually try anything out of their comfort zone - which is smaller than most folks think. 2. Tour pros are like swing doctors. They know everything there is to know about the golf swing. Nope - they are simply phenomenal listeners and executors. 3. You must understand the swing in it's entirety to learn and become better - Yeah, good luck on that path.   4. To have lag just hold the angle of the shaft to forearm until impact. - Lag is a result of good mechanics and club position and path. Can't force it. 5. You must have a superlight grip pressure (2-3 on a scale of 1 to 10) to hit good shots. - While white knuckling is just bad, you do need more grip pressure than you think.
    •   The problem is the twitter length version, get it as close to the hole as possible, is easy to read as, hit the longest club.  Really the argument in LSW (backed by stats), is around a multi-faceted risk assessment.  Simplifying less than the twitter version, hit it as far as possible without bringing "too much" risk into play.  The long version is basically a law of total probability argument, where you assess the probability of various outcomes with each current shot choice, and weight them by the average shots to hole out given each outcome, and choose the lowest. For example, you're sitting at 250 on a par 5.  You go through the potential outcomes of an 8i and 3i and estimate average shots to hole out from each: on target, slightly off target, chunk, blade, in jail, in hazard, open look but super penal rough, OB, whatever.  Then you think about the chances of these outcomes, and calculate the total expected score from each choice. The point in LSW is that you can't go through a bunch of equations for every shot, but if you're accurate about your average shot dispersions across clubs, then the typical bogey or better golfer is often overestimating the increase in risk from going for the longer shot, and underestimating the decrease in expected number of shots to hole out from getting it closer. The rule of thumb is that if there's not something in the layout that is a big risk at the longer distance but not at the short one – so in your case lateral hazard or big fairway thinning or big fairway bunker or much or penal rough or the like that starts at 75 yards out – then generally your lower expected total score is from hitting the longer club.  The strokes you lose when you do hit an errant long iron but wouldn't have hit an errant short iron are more than made up for by the strokes you gain from having an approach half as long when you don't hit an errant shot. Of course, it's always case by case and player by player.
    • I've been working on changing that for two years!
    • If this is true, then club fitting would be purely entertainment also and make no difference.  We could all use different clubs every time we played with no measurable effect on our score.  I'm not so sure all the time, money and effort that has gone towards studying the benefits of club fitting and developing custom club programs and fitting carts and training techs how to conduct a club fitting session would have been spent if it's all just "entertainment". Now, will there be a huge difference between the e6 and e7 for the average player?  No.  They are both 3 piece distance balls with the same type of cover, so the differences are not huge.  Noticeable, but not huge.  The difference between an e6 and a Pro V1 though will be dramatic.  And the number of players that played the Pro V that have been recommended the e6 are in the tens of thousands.  Not only is there a difference in the performance of those balls, but when you factor in the tendencies of the player the results can be substantial.  If a 10-15 yard gain won't have any affect on the average player's score, then you wouldn't mind if you had to give up 10-15 yards of distance off your drives and 5-7 off your irons, correct?  How would it affect your score if you had to tee off 25 yds  further back on every hole?  I'm guessing it would cost at least a couple of shots. Can @iacas shoot 75 with his wife's clubs?  Probably.  That doesn't mean that the equipment doesn't matter.  He would certainly need to make adjustments in his swing to hit them, which is hard to repeat precisely, so it would limit him from playing his best.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dragondrake
      Dragondrake
      (57 years old)
    2. Mistabigevil
      Mistabigevil
      (36 years old)
    3. Taylor56
      Taylor56
      (61 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon