Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

FINALLY got a birdie.


Note: This thread is 4838 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Seems like it took absolutely forever, I've par'd more holes that I can count, two chip in's from 10ft or so off the green to save par, but never really had a shot at birdie that didn't have just a brutal putt needed. Today I was playing 18 at Southern Hills and the 5th is a par 3 139 yard down hill shot with trouble on the back if you overshoot it. I took an 8i, gave her a nice smooth swing and came up on the fringe, bounced twice and stopped 8' from the flag. I have absolutely no idea how I just cleared my head, aimed a bit right on the putt, gave her a gentle stroked and watched the ball bang off the back of the cup and fall in (green slopes towards the trouble as well).

I just kinda stood there in silence grinning like an idiot, picked up my ball and went back to trying to play legitimate bogey golf for 13 more holes. Still wasn't a great round, just joined this club, only played there a few times and there is a LOT of water and OB but it makes you more careful and in the end I think it will make me a better golfer.

 910 D2 10.5  910F 3w  910H 19*

 712 AP1 4-GW  Vokey SM4 54* and 58*

  Select Golo  E5


Posted

Are you trying to say that you average a 92 for 18 holes (and presumably not infrequently break 90) but you've never had a birdie before?  How long have you been playing?  How many rounds per year since you first picked up the game?

In my bag: - Ping G20 driver, 10.5 deg. S flex - Ping G20 3W, 15 deg., S flex - Nickent 4dx 3H, 4H - Nike Slingshot 4-PW - Adams Tom Watson 52 deg. GW - Vokey 58 deg. SW -Ping Half Wack-E putter


Posted
Yep, exactly what I'm saying. On my home course I played at all summer I typically score 88-90, I venture out to other courses I'm unfamiliar with and it varies from there. The club I just joined plays a lot longer and is rated at 73.5 and my average score there is low 90's but I've never birdied a hole before today. I play 10+ times a month, started playing seriously/regularly in may. I've had several opportunities to birdie before but I've always choked. Today it just went well for me even though I shot a 92 on the round. Let water get in my head and took 4 penalty strokes.

 910 D2 10.5  910F 3w  910H 19*

 712 AP1 4-GW  Vokey SM4 54* and 58*

  Select Golo  E5


Posted

Well, congratulations.

You're doing remarkably well for someone who has only played one season.  You're shooting better by 3-5 strokes per round than I do and I've been playing 19 years (albeit with 5 seasons of <3 rounds/year after becoming a father).  You've played nearly 5x as much golf this season as I have (I've been out maybe 12 rounds) but I've had 5 birdies this year (1 chip-in, 2 lucky longer putts, 2 approach shots within 4 feet).  That's a lot for me, as I typically averaged 1-3 birdies per season back when I played more, but I've spent a lot of time practicing my short game this season.  I could see taking 50 rounds before getting your first birdie -  I got mine after about 6 rounds when I had a lucky 5-iron from 155 yds to 8 inches, the closest I've come to an ace and didn't have another for over a year - except that someone with less than a 20 handicap should be hitting close enough to the pin every 50 or 70 holes to get a birdie, I would think.  If everything you've said is true, it sounds to me like you need to work a lot more on your short game, particularly your putting.  Some of those putts should be falling - it shouldn't take another 900 holes until you get your next birdie.

I'll give you one of the best tips on putting I've ever heard:  watch how you are doing on sloped greens and I bet you are hitting most of your missed putts well below the hole (i.e. you're underestimating the break).  Years ago I read in a golf magazine that nearly all amateur golfers chronically underestimate the break and the solution was to scout out both sides of the hole, estimate the break, then add another 50% more break to your initial estimate.

In my bag: - Ping G20 driver, 10.5 deg. S flex - Ping G20 3W, 15 deg., S flex - Nickent 4dx 3H, 4H - Nike Slingshot 4-PW - Adams Tom Watson 52 deg. GW - Vokey 58 deg. SW -Ping Half Wack-E putter


Posted

Congratulations.

May your next birdie come quicker than the last one.

Save the Scorecard.

DD

In the Bag

Driver - Taylormade R1 Black

FW - Taylormade Burner Superfast 2.0 15* 3-Metal

FW - Taylormade Burner Superfast 2.0 18* 5-Metal

Irons - Ping G15 4i-UW

Wedge - Ping Anser 54* SW

Wedge - Ping Tour-S 60* LW

Putter - Ping Anser 4

Ball - Top Flight D2+ Feel

Rangefinder - Callaway/Nikon LR550


Posted

Thanks guys. Wiseguy it's not my short game as much as my approach shots that suck. Over all these holes I have averaged less than 2 putts per hole. I'll 3 putt with the best of them on occasion but typically I'll have 3-4 1 putts and the remainder will be 2fer's.

I just rarely green in reg a hole so it ruins my chances. I drive the ball well enough that it's usually in play and 220-240 off the tee (trying to maintain control and avoid penalty strokes). What comes next is what gets me, if I have to swing a 3/4h or a 4/5 iron for the next shot, I'll botch it. Something in my head, not everytime but occasionally. I'm practicing several times a week though and focusing on the shots that kill my score right now so it's coming along. Yesterday I stuck 3 greens from 115-120 out, not dead on where I wanted them but close enough to make one good long putt and have an easy second for par.

It'll come around, I recently sold my bass boat and will focus on golf solely for the next two years instead of dividing my attention. I'd really like to see a single digit handicap one day.

 910 D2 10.5  910F 3w  910H 19*

 712 AP1 4-GW  Vokey SM4 54* and 58*

  Select Golo  E5


Posted

We're alike in that we both miss a lot of approach shots and I also gave up fishing to concentrate more on golf, lol.  Congrats on the first birdie, may there be many more to follow.  I've been lucky to make a handful this season - all with lucky approach shots that landed to maybe 8 feet - my putting has been awful this year - doubt I dropped a single long putt this year.


Posted

AW I think they may start to come with a bit more regularity after today. I bought a set of AP1 712's from the classifieds here and picked them up this morning. Went and played a quick nine at my local muni since my club was closed today because of a hellacious storm overnight. Well all I can say is WOW, I fear the long iron no more. I've had TM Burner 2.0's, Callaway X18's, Adams CB2's which were fitted etc and this box stock set of AP1's is longer by a mile and straighter than any other club I've ever hit. My normal swing with a 4-5 iron wouldn't get a ball off the ground and were typically all toe strikes. Today I hit a 4i 190 gps off the tee box to layup before a creek and followed it up with a 5i 177 to GIR a par 3. My typical 5i is 155 off the tee on a pure shot with any club I've ever had and I've never understood why. On the track man I have a mid 80mph swing with a 7i yet never got more than 130 in the real world typically. Today I GIR'd the 4th hole with a 9i from 132 and after each shot I'd clean the club so I could see where the next strike was. All of them were right around dead center. This is the first time I've actually hit "average" distances with my irons, I've always been 20 yards short per club from every one else I play with. I had to hit the 4i from the fairway twice on par 5s and was amazed at the distances I got and the height of the ball flight.

Shafts I've used on my other two sets are TM stock stiff on the 2.0's and KBS90 stiff on the CB2's. Don't know why the AP1 head and S300 shaft made such a difference but I am in love completely. End of round score was still my average for 9 on that place but that will change as soon as I get used to my club selection now for distances. Maybe there is hope to actually play legitimate bogey golf for me yet.

 910 D2 10.5  910F 3w  910H 19*

 712 AP1 4-GW  Vokey SM4 54* and 58*

  Select Golo  E5


Note: This thread is 4838 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.