Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4823 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

In an attempt to lower my scores, I totally changed my game management approach at the end of last season.  Instead of worrying about how I'm going to get on a green in 2 or 3 shots on a Par 5 I worry about what shot I want going into the green.  I'm very accurate with my PW-SW but struggle with 50 yards and less chip and pitch shots, which I work on during practice but now avoid during rounds I count towards handicap.

For example, on a Par 5, 450 yard hole before the change to my game management I'd try to hit driver or 3w which would usually be 220 - 240 yards around of fairway or lost in the woods.  Best case my 2nd shot was 210 yards which was either a 3w or 3h and I'd usually best case end up short of the green with a awkward distance chip or pitch shot or in the bunker/rough/woods/water.  Typically, by the time I got on the green, I was putting 5 or 6 depending on the penalties and flubbed shots.

Now I play that same hole so that my shot into the green is always between 80-120 yards so I can use a full wedge shot.  Since I want about 100 yard shot to the green I now just have to worry about how I get to 350 in 2 shots, which for me is a 3h off the tee and 5i or 6i.  I rarely will miss the fairway with a hybrid or long iron off the tee, and my 5i or 6i is good enough to get me where I need to be off a decent fairway lie.  Using this approach, I will always be putting 4, which kills my chances at eagles and pretty much birdies but allows me to hit pars and bogeys more regularly.

Regardless of the distance you can hit, if you work backwards from the hole, you're likely going to score better unless you have a great short game.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I would definitely suggest kinda what you have been saying. Most armatures have a mindset that they need to get the ball as close to the green as possible at all times. For some this may work but for most it is better to set yourself up with an approach shot you are comfortable with. There is also less room for error when hitting a mid iron instead of a FW. Also this about the whole from the tee box. Say you are playing a par % hole that is 540 yards. Say you kit your 6 iron 180 yards. If you hit your 5 iron 3 times you end up on or around the green. It has been my experience that if you have a game plan before playing the hole your mind then knows what you are planning to do and there is less to think about. ...Just food for thought. Hope it helps


Posted
Originally Posted by gimpie

Hey bj,

Just curious what course youre playing at?

Hi gimpie.....I am a member at Montgomery Country Club in Laytonsville MD.  Thus that is the course that I play the most.  I play the white tees which are about 6350 yards, the rating is 70.6 and slope is 128.  The blue tees (which are the tips) are too long and tough for me right now.  They play about 6800 yards.

I am playing in Northern VA twice this upcoming weekend though.  On Saturday I am playing very early at Forest Greens and then later on Saturday I am playing in a scramble tournament at the Gauntlet.  Both are in northern VA.  I've never played either course, my good friend who I play with all the time at my club has played both and set up both rounds.  Looking forward to it!

Where do you usually play at?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

How often do you one-putt after an approach from 125-150 (birdie)?  I'd say I do that maybe 5-10% of the time.  I'd say 60% of the time I either hit the green and 2-putt or miss and get up and down for par.  30% of the time I either 3-putt or miss and don't get up and down and walk away with bogey.  Compare that to what you do from 250 yards out with a 3w.  Maybe you get on and 1-putt for eagle only 1% of the time, but you get on and 2-putt or miss but get up and down for birdie 20% of the time.  And maybe 60% of the time you miss, chip, and two-putt for par 60% of the time.  To get a bogey you either need a penalty or a bad 3W followed by a bad pitch or putt.

So the odds of getting an eagle are non-existent when you lay up, the odds of getting a birdie are down, and the odds of getting par are about the same.

Now, if you're 3W is going into the woods, or if there is water next to the green, that changes everything.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4823 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • So, Brendan Sorsby, Texas Tech transfer QB, was found guilty of sports betting by the NCAA. He admitted to it. He placed thousands of bets over multiple years while at Indiana and Cincinnati. This included betting on his own teams.  The NCAA rules ban athletes from betting on any sport (college or pro).  A retired visiting judge from Tarrant County, Texas has put an injunction on the NCAA ruling. He is a visiting judge because the first judge was a graduate and big fan of Texas Tech, and he recused himself. The judged ruled the following... "Under Curry's order, Sorsby is permitted to play for Texas Tech's 2026 season on the condition that he continues his treatment for a gambling and anxiety disorder and serves a two-game suspension (missing games against Abilene Christian and Oregon State)."  Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly care for the NCAA. That still doesn't mean that a college can choose when or where to say, "Yea we agree to these rules for all our sports, well except in this case." Here is a breakdown from S&W. The Hidden Weapon in Sorsby’s Injunction: How a Lubbock County Court Order Quietly Neutralized the NCAA’s Most Powerful Enforcement Tool - Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer By Ryan J. Regula On June 8, 2026, Lubbock County District Court Judge Ken Curry issued a temporary injunction in Brendan Sorsby v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, Cause No. DC-2026-CV-0791 (99th Judicial District... The main judgement made sense. Sorsby, I am going to have all this harm done to me if I don't get to play. The Judge, I agree. The penalty for gambling is too harsh, so here are all these things you must do, and I will grant this injunction against the NCAA. Basically, an analogy would be when a person goes into court for a DUI and they agree to all these other things to not end up in jail.  What sucks for the NCAA is the NCAA has appealed to Texas’ Seventh Court of Appeals, based in Amarillo. All four justices that preside over the court are graduates of Texas Tech University School of Law. It would be hilarious if all four of them had to recuse themselves 🤣. For those who like to read legal rulings...  
    • The chatter in my brain is when the distance is between clubs since I am pretty weak at shortened backswings, etc. I try to simply decide if being long or short is the better outcome and choose my club based on that and simply not even try for the “real” distance.  For me a full normal swing is what I strive for.
    • I saw this comment made in a golf article... "Most golfers stand over a 4- or 5-iron still negotiating with themselves. They think about how hard to swing, whether they have the right club, if they have the aim correct and more. It’s a lot to deal with and long irons punish the “half-in” golf swing." I am not sure the "most golfers" is correct regarding the bolded part. I can understand if there is a bunker, water, and/or OB that a lot of golfers would be fixated on that. I am not sure that leads to ending up more times there. Pending your level in golf, the variance is so large in outcomes, it could be just with in the expected outcomes. I can understand if have a big lake on the right side of the hole being one of the most terrifying shots for right-handed amateur golfers.  I am not sure many golfers are standing over the ball talking to themselves, "Ok, maybe I should step back and pull the 4-iron. Am I lined up right? Oh, the wind came up, should I swing harder? What am I going to have for dinner tonight, maybe steak. (Joking, somewhat 😛)" A question is that how much chatter do you get while standing over the ball. Are you questioning the everything about your golf shot?   
    • Wordle 1,816 5/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,816 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.