• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Valleygolfer

MP-33 loft alterations

9 posts in this topic

I am going to get my new to me MP-33s spec'd out for lie and loft. They come with the standard DGS300 shaft. I am wondering if I would benefit from stronger lofts, roughly adding 2° to PW thru 6 iron and 1° to the 5 thru 2 iron to match my current I10 setup. I would like to pay for this once so any personal experience with using clubs like this is welcomed.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Be aware that strengthening the lofts of the clubs will reduce the bounce by the same amount. The MP-33s have between 3 and 5 degrees of bounce according to the specs.

How much that will affect how the clubs interact with the ground will probably depend a bit on your swing.

Personally I'd want a pretty good reason before I'd go messing with the way the clubs were designed. If it's just that you don't want to hit your 5 irons shorter than you used to, well I'd say you'll quickly adjust.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know about the bounce change. I know it it would be a loss of more than what I normally hit. I don't know if it would affect my shots. Supposedly the "digger" style swing is affected adversely with the loss of bounce. I would say that I do like to take a solid divot so it could affect me. I know that the blades have a lower launch so the distance may not be affected much however I normally hit a high ball. That may also exaggerated with my current CB irons and flimsy for me shafts. I will probably get them checked and brought to stock specs if needed and go from there unless info is proven otherwise.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Mordan

Personally I'd want a pretty good reason before I'd go messing with the way the clubs were designed. If it's just that you don't want to hit your 5 irons shorter than you used to, well I'd say you'll quickly adjust.

I just wanted to create less of a learning curve on club distance but I am planning going out on my home course late evening and hit five balls, each marked differently to know which were hit "flush" to get my distances.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

go get custom fitted first and see how you do on the launch monitor. i keep the standard lofts and just lag my swing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Valleygolfer

I just wanted to create less of a learning curve on club distance but I am planning going out on my home course late evening and hit five balls, each marked differently to know which were hit "flush" to get my distances.

The lengths are different too. And you didn't mention if you have the same shafts in your i10s but even if they're the same there's every chance that you'll still launch them a little differently anyway.

Just take them out on the course and you'll pretty quickly realise if you hit them a little shorter or longer than your i10s.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Mordan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valleygolfer

I just wanted to create less of a learning curve on club distance but I am planning going out on my home course late evening and hit five balls, each marked differently to know which were hit "flush" to get my distances.

The lengths are different too. And you didn't mention if you have the same shafts in your i10s but even if they're the same there's every chance that you'll still launch them a little differently anyway.

Just take them out on the course and you'll pretty quickly realise if you hit them a little shorter or longer than your i10s.

Length wise the PW is the only difference by .25", with the MP-33 shorter. The shafts are different but I was planning on switching the shafts on these anyway. I have very high launching AWT shafts in the pings and S300 in the MP-33s. I was told I needed X100s but I will wait and see how the ball flight goes. If I am happy with blades I may go to a MP-69 or the 713's late summer.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Valleygolfer

Length wise the PW is the only difference by .25", with the MP-33 shorter. The shafts are different but I was planning on switching the shafts on these anyway. I have very high launching AWT shafts in the pings and S300 in the MP-33s. I was told I needed X100s but I will wait and see how the ball flight goes. If I am happy with blades I may go to a MP-69 or the 713's late summer.

Ha, I only checked the PW and assumed there would be a difference through the set.

If you're ballooning shots with the i10s then you'll probably find you gain back any distance lost due to loft and maybe some more as well with the MP-33s.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Mordan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valleygolfer

Length wise the PW is the only difference by .25", with the MP-33 shorter. The shafts are different but I was planning on switching the shafts on these anyway. I have very high launching AWT shafts in the pings and S300 in the MP-33s. I was told I needed X100s but I will wait and see how the ball flight goes. If I am happy with blades I may go to a MP-69 or the 713's late summer.

Ha, I only checked the PW and assumed there would be a difference through the set.

If you're ballooning shots with the i10s then you'll probably find you gain back any distance lost due to loft and maybe some more as well with the MP-33s.


That is what I was hoping for. I am excited to find out.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Yep! I have both a FJ jacket and pants in rainwear that I bought years ago. I don't use them very often so they've lasted a long time. But, they're heavy and hot! They were made before GoreTex and other waterproof, breathable fabrics. My advice? Get the absolute best you can afford! They will last you a long time, they will keep you comfortable, they will be light, and they won't impede your swing very much.
    • Thanks for all the responses. I think this boils down to the context of the situation. I had two of the foursome busting chops about hitting out of order on previous holes. Then the first time it was mildly inconvenient for them to wait, the holed out just as i hit the green. Mind you.  This wasnt an "adventure" hole.. I hit the green on stroke 5 because of a flub shot that went about 10 ft. And an errant approach that left me about 10 yards short of the green. In any other case I agree that its perfectly fine to hit when ready, but not if you complain about hitting out of order. I guess to paint the picture, one whipped a club on the 3rd hole due to sculling a shout out of the bunker.. on another hole had one of them walking towards green right in front of my approach.. he nicely moved about 3 yards to the right as i asked him to move. As karma would have it, i hit the shot straight at him and nearly hit him.. these were friends of mine.. so a lesson learned to play golf with different friends..
    • Picked one up and checked it out in a store the other day. First thing I noticed about it was how heavy it was. Reminded me of when I went out for the HS golf team, and the coach had a Driver with a solid steel head on it. He advised us that we were NOT to hit drives with it! It was for warm up only. Being as heavy as it is, I think the main benefit to it might be that it slows your transition from backswing to downswing. There's a whole lot of guys who could use that!
    • OK, this kind of clears things up for me. I thought you might have been trying to take close ups of clubheads impacting golf balls. In that case you'd need something numbering in the several thousands of fps! If all you need is to look at swings I'd say anything the budget allows should suffice. Consider the 960fps system mentioned. If a golf swing takes about I second, at a playback rate of 30fps, that gives you a swing video of 32 seconds in length. Plenty long enough to see the golfer's bodily motions. Considering how small the clubhead will appear when videoing the entire golfer, I don't know that fps is the main consideration. It could be pixel count and the quality of the lenses. This reminds me of my "audiophile" days when cassette tapes were all the rage. I had a BIC deck that could record at 7 1/2 ips (inches per second), and an Audiovox car player that could play back at that speed. The sound quality was amazing! You were putting the same amount of info into twice as much space! There was so much more room!
    • Wondered how and where achievements came from. I've broken par,  ( handicap is +3) 2 eagles on par 5's so far this year Hole in one 2 years ago on vacation in Arizona at Karsten ASU course.  My first one.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Just trying
      Just trying
      (33 years old)
    2. Peter_b
      Peter_b
      (45 years old)
    3. SACgolf
      SACgolf
      (51 years old)
    4. Weluvgolf
      Weluvgolf
      (53 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon