Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4618 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

This might be a stupid question, but does anyone else get blisters on there hands where they grip the club, even though you focus hard at gripping lightly?  I've been trying to really concentrate lately on a very light grip, but I'm getting blisters on my left hand. Is there a way of gripping incorrectly that can cause this, or am I probably still gripping way too hard, even though I think I'm not?

I obviously don't wear a glove when I play.


  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by albatross

This might be a stupid question, but does anyone else get blisters on there hands where they grip the club, even though you focus hard at gripping lightly?

Stop gripping it lightly.

Virtually no PGA Tour players grip the club "lightly."

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I always think of it this way. How many golf balls does a pro player hit every day. Now how many golf balls do you hit ever day. Now think of that in terms of weight lifting. If your a professional weight lifter, your going to think 50 lbs is a light weight. If your a professional golfer, your going to think the golf club is light. Its the same things, the hands are controlled my muscles, and the more there used the stronger they are. The stronger they are the more weight they can perceive as considered "Light"

So, when a pro golfer says, hold the club lightly, think about it as a professional weight lifter saying, 50 lbs is a light weight to lift. You'll never think that holding a golf club lightly is apples to apples again.

  • Upvote 1

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

Stop gripping it lightly.

Virtually no PGA Tour players grip the club "lightly."

Ok, I had a feeling you would say that because I've read your posts before on grip pressure (they were helpful by the way, despite my post).  :)    So why am I getting blisters on my left hand when hitting a minimal amount of balls?


Posted

Two things I should add.  #1, I should be saying calluses and not blisters.  #2, I have a brand new set of irons, which obviously have brand new grips.  Could this be making a big difference?


  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by albatross

So why am I getting blisters on my left hand when hitting a minimal amount of balls?

Originally Posted by albatross

Two things I should add.  #1, I should be saying calluses and not blisters.  #2, I have a brand new set of irons, which obviously have brand new grips.  Could this be making a big difference?

Calluses are fine. I have them. Most golfers have minor calluses, just like guitar players have them, etc.

New grips contribute some. But it's mostly light grip pressure. A fast change of direction will move the grip in your hands. Impact causes a LOT of vibration in your hands.

As you've seen me post - firm grip , but soft wrists and elbows and shoulders).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Your calluses are really just a consequence of rubbing and friction between your hand and grip.  So it could be because of how you grip the club, or the texture of the new grips.  Or those could be just fine.  There's a reason why most golfers where a glove, and if you've ever noticed, many golfers will tape certain fingers when they play.  I don't get calluses, but I do tape my left thumb so half the tape is over the nail and half on the skin.  For some reason, even with a glove, the skin gets pulled away from the nail and gets sore and tender for a couple of days after a round of golf,  Using tape while I golf just eliminates that problem.


Posted
Originally Posted by albatross

Two things I should add.  #1, I should be saying calluses and not blisters.  #2, I have a brand new set of irons, which obviously have brand new grips.  Could this be making a big difference?

check if your grips are dirty. I recently cleaned my after playing about 5 rounds of golf, my hands were black from the grips before i cleaned them. Played Monday, my hands weren't dirty at all. Dirty grips can increase friction because it decreases friction. I mean in terms of the grip moving slightly in your hands it increases friction wear. But in actuality the grip is smoother because of the dirt on the grip.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4618 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.