• Announcements

    • iacas

      Introducing TST "Clubs!"   08/28/2017

      No, we're not getting into the equipment business, but we do have "clubs" here on TST now. Groups. Check them out here:
Sign in to follow this  
Stuffs

Driver face height questions

Recommended Posts

Stuffs    3

Its amazing the changes I see (for the good) when every 3-4 years I look at or shop for a driver.  But one thing I never really understood is the face height.  The last time I shopped for one, it was all about the shallower face (ie SQ 5900, MX700) and before that, it was all about the deeper faces (Launcher 460 type heads).  Now it seems like its back to deeper faces.

I'm just trying to gain a better understanding as to why the back and forth.  I think I know the basic concept that deeper faces lower traj and shallower face higher traj.  From what it seems, most are going after a higher launch, lower spin results.  So wouldn't a shallower face achieve that a little easier?  I know I'm way off base somewhere that's why I'd to see if anyone can chime in on it.

Also, I've been told a lot of things from sales staffs that I'm not sure if its true or not.  I was told that deeper face tend to hit fades easier whereas shallower or slightly wider faces are easier to hit a draw. But a few years back when all the clubs out there had shallower faces, I was told the opposite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

iacas    4,173

I think at any given moment you can find plenty of both on the market. I don't see the same "trends" you've seen. For example, Titleist's two drivers have always been a shallower, wider face and a deeper, narrower face.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Stuffs    3
Originally Posted by iacas

I think at any given moment you can find plenty of both on the market. I don't see the same "trends" you've seen. For example, Titleist's two drivers have always been a shallower, wider face and a deeper, narrower face.

Well, the D2 isn't exactly shallow, its more shallow to the D3, but still fairly deep compared to what was out there a few years back.  I guess more accurately put, a few years or more back, the shallow ones out on market vs the deep was much more noticeable, whereas now, even the shallow ones are only marginally so than their deeper counterpart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

iacas    4,173
Originally Posted by Stuffs

Well, the D2 isn't exactly shallow, its more shallow to the D3, but still fairly deep compared to what was out there a few years back.  I guess more accurately put, a few years or more back, the shallow ones out on market vs the deep was much more noticeable, whereas now, even the shallow ones are only marginally so than their deeper counterpart.

The point remains that there's not a cycle IMO. The HiBore, for example, almost had to be that shape.

In other words, I think the shape of the face is governed by other things - how much weight they're trying to move around (and to where), what "stuff" they've got - adjustable hosels, odd crowns, moveable weights, etc. - and so on. The face shape is a result more than something they directly try to control. You're supposed to hit the center of the clubface, after all. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Stuffs    3
Originally Posted by iacas

You're supposed to hit the center of the clubface, after all. :)

Exactly.  That's what I was wondering if the face height or shape had any influence on ball flight even when struck in center.  But you draw a good point with the face shape being a result form other factors they're trying to control while maintaining max cc or so.

For me, I tend to hit deeper faces lower, sometimes with less spin than I'd like.  But I never knew whether it was the face height or just how the other factors played out in those head that caused it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave40    2

I remember there were two versions of the Titleist 905.  The 905T had a taller, narrower face and was supposed to be able to work the ball better than the 905R which had a wider and shallower face.  The 905R was supposed to be easier to hit for less skilled golfers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WUTiger    453

I have always preferred a deeper face driver. I play a lot of public courses, and the deeper face gives me a margin of error when teeing off from chopped-up tee boxes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • Thank you both for replying. Yes, I have tried to come in a bit steeper, but it does not seem to help, or perhaps I feel that I am a bit steeper but I am really not. I am now thinking that it may be related to distance to the ball at setup (i.e. arms more or less extended) vs. a slight loss of balance towards my heels. I played once more since my original post, and I only managed to hit a fairway wood properly twice, out of 6 or 7 tries (including two bad ones from a tee!). Perhaps there is progress, I don't know. I am paying a lot of attention to the setup, making sure I don't sway back, turn fully, give plenty of time for the backswing to finish, making sure I am not falling backwards in the downswing... Probably too many thoughts in my head at this point, so there I am, still totally confused... 
    • 9/23/17:  I've been working so hard on my wedges, my driver was shit on Thursday. So I worked for ten minutes on the same sort of feels with the driver, easier backswing, light grip pressure, etc.
    • I don't know what you mean. Added, congrats!
    • So much for distance trumping accuracy...  Played my first round of golf with the shortened driver and was very happy with control and distance. I hit my first drive of the day to the right on purpose to avoid water on the left. Unfortunately, it went beyond the out of bounds markers that I hadn't realized were there (first time playing this course). After that everything stayed in play until I topped one into a hazard (because I thought it would be a good idea to fix something that wasn't broken, ha ha). I averaged 227yds on 7 drives with a very easy swing... about 8 yards longer than what I'd been averaging. I'd be ok with less distance and this kind of control. All five of my 5w shots staying in play. As far as the round, I don't think I've ever hit so many solid iron shots and scored so poorly. The course, which was a bit longer than I'm used to, was very tight with a lot of water - but that's not why I scored so poorly. I was hitting irons just far enough offline to lose them in the dense woods - tons of penalties from what has been my strength. It's been a long time since I've scored over 60 in 9 holes of golf. I shot a 49 the first time through. Altogether, I averaged more distance but with less control and shot one of my highest scores in a while.
    • 81 - great round for me
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. grilljm
      grilljm
      (71 years old)
    2. Joe92385
      Joe92385
      (32 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon