• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
G22inSC

Ping Eye2 questions

5 posts in this topic

I have decided to try and pick up the game again (at the age of 36) after not swinging a club in over 20 years.  I never really was any good years ago and more or less played for fun with family and on vacations.  My grandfather was an avid golfer and I remember when I was very young going out with him while he played.  He recently passed away and I was given his clubs (that I secretly wanted but never mentioned).  All I remembered about them were that they were Ping Eye2s.

I found the serial number on the matching irons and sent that to Ping for their specs.  The following is what I received back:

Serial Number:xxx76
Model:EYE2
Club(s):1-9PWSW
Color Code:BLACK
Swing Weight:B9
Shaft:NZ+
Length:STD
Grip:D-B/W
Status:STAMPED
Manufacturing Date:2/23/1985

I was able to determine by looking at the actual clubs that they are black dots with a "red color banded" EZ Lite shaft.  I have not been able to find any information online about that shaft.  Apparently they should have come with a NZ+ shaft.  The head does have the Patent Pending mark with KARSTEN PHOENIX AZ 85068 U.S.A. right-side-up on back of top rail.

Can anyone provide specifics on exactly what these clubs are (V groove, U groove, Lite version, etc.) and what the shafts are?  I have no idea what the swing weight and grip is referring to.

The set is also missing the 1 Iron and the SW.  Is it possible to order replacements from Ping as I have seen somewhere (can't find now) or are these clubs just too old?

Thanks so much for shining any light on what I have in my bag.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

As far as I know, you have the original Eye2 with U grooves. They should come with the ZZ lite shaft, which is a heavy, stiff shaft.

You probably can't get any replacement clubs from Ping, as the Eye2s are too old. Your best bet, if you need them, is to search the internet for the clubs. You could probably do without the 1 iron anyway.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ping eye 2 came out in 1982... These were a super game improvment club and real easy to hit... If black dot and you are standard and they fit you I would play them...

They have a MPF ( maltby playability factor of 724.. Means big sweet spot...)

Here is the info you want I belive..

1982-1984
Original. The first Eye2 iron. Made from 1982-1984. This patent pending design featured "V" grooves.


1984-1985
U Groove. The second Eye2 iron featuring "U" grooves. The result of the 1984 USGA ruling allowing square grooves. Made from the middle of 1984 to the fall of 1985. US Patent D276644. Other patents pending.


1984-1985
EZ Lite. A version of the "U Groove" featuring a lighter swingweight, the result of a slightly smaller head. The shaft featured an "EZ-Lite" band. Made from the middle of 1984 to the fall of 1985.


1985-1990
Square Groove Design is identical to the "U Groove" with the only change ocurring in the grooves. The change involed modifying the groove by creating a slight radius at the top of the groove. This new model is referred to as the "Square Groove". This change reduced the amount of surface area between the groove but did not change the distance between the inside edges of the grooves. Made from the fall of 1985 to the spring of 1990. US Patents D4512577 and D276644.


1986
Eye2 Beryllium Copper. Patent pending design identical to the stainless steel "Square Groove" but made from Beryllium Copper.


1987
Eye2 Beryllium Copper Patented design identical to the "Square Groove" design but made from Beryllium Copper. US Patents D4512577 and D276644.


1989-1990
Eye2+ No+ (Plus No Plus). New head design featuring a "scalloped" sole. The scalloped refered to the design process where metal was removed from the center of the sole and redistributed in the inside of the cavity near the toe. Additional design features included a more rediused sole, a modified bounce and grind, a slightly thinner topline, a slight increase in clubhead size, a little higher and more rounded toe, and slightly stronger lofts. The grooves were the same as the "Square Groove" model. Made from the fall of 1989 to the spring of 1990.


1990-present
Eye2 Dot. Same design as the "Square Groove" model but with increased groove width as a result of the agrrement reached between Ping and the USGA regarding grooves. Distinguished by the raise dot or drill mark within eye in cavity. Made from spring 1990 to present.


1990-present
Eye2+ Same design features as the "+ No +" model but with increased groove width. Available in stainless steel and copper. Made from spring of 1990 to present. Distinguished by the "+" in the cavity underneath the patent numbers. US Patents 4512577 and 4621813. Ping ceased production of the beryllium copper model in 1999 due to environmental regulations.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by lawrosa

1984-1985

U Groove. The second Eye2 iron featuring "U" grooves. The result of the 1984 USGA ruling allowing square grooves. Made from the middle of 1984 to the fall of 1985. US Patent D276644. Other patents pending.

1984-1985

EZ Lite. A version of the "U Groove" featuring a lighter swingweight, the result of a slightly smaller head. The shaft featured an "EZ-Lite" band. Made from the middle of 1984 to the fall of 1985.

Any way to figure out which one of these I have?  The band is badly worn but I can make out "EZ-Lite" on a few of them.  I was told the factory original shaft was a NZ+.  Would the swing weight code (B9) give any indication?  Does the first group above show the US Patent D276644 on the club or just "Patent Pending"?

Sorry for all the questions.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have this from what your post says... U grroves and easy lite... Lighter swing weight, smaller head... Its all written in black and white....

1984-1985
EZ Lite. A version of the "U Groove" featuring a lighter swingweight, the result of a slightly smaller head. The shaft featured an "EZ-Lite" band. Made from the middle of 1984 to the fall of 1985.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • I went through the same experimentation phase with my "standard" clubs when I first began thinking about single length clubs a couple years ago, and as @inthecup mentioned, the results were not good -- the gaps were not good, the swing weights were different (because the head weights were different), lies were wrong, etc. But, I saw enough of an improvement in ball striking (i.e. not hitting fat as often on the long irons) that I tried the Pinhawks (ValueGolf). Aaron @ Value Golf has been selling Pinhawks for a couple years, but increasing demand for single length irons seems to outstrip supply occasionally (resulting in stock-outs). So if you're serious about trying it, sooner would be better than later -- I recently had to wait 30 days to send a contest winner their iron heads because they were completely out and were waiting for their next manufacturing run to be delivered.  
    • That sounds less like a slow play issue and more like a no play issue. I'd imagine your guys plopped down somewhere for a late afternoon picnic. They probably engaged in a few ball-hunting expeditions and may have taken a swim in a water hazard.  
    • Have been using one for a few months now and love it.  Has taken about 3 putts off my normal putts per round average.  Where I see the biggest difference is with my lag putting.  Has not made any difference with short putts, but I tend to miss the center of the face on longer putts and I have noticed a pretty significant difference.  The ball gets closer to the hole whereas my old Scotty would spray it further left, right, or short.   I am very confident it is giving me a chance at less 3 putts which was the biggest reason I bought one.   Its a very legit putter.  Worth trying out, but absolutely make sure to go to someone who knows how to fit for a putter.
    • I usually play munis. I try to have no time expectations (or for that matter, game expectations lol) when playing golf. I leave my house 45 minutes before a round, and usually get home 5 hours and thirty minutes later. 18 holes is anywhere from 4 to 4.5 hours. If I have later appointments I book golf earlier.  Over the past month I have invited a new person to golf on two separate occasions. (we are not trying to grow the game, just have an enjoyable outing with family or friend) We planned only 9 holes. Walking 9 holes and flailing at a little white ball tires a new comer. They have no idea of what pace of play means. We explained it and played pick up the f-----g ball if we started losing contact with those in front. We have a local 9 hole muni. It is often populated by occasional golfers. It is rated as intermediate difficulty. It is often slower on weekends and holidays. If I want to play there I either pick a different time or smell the roses.  If its two non golfing couples playing in front of us, I smell the roses. They have no clue what pace of play means, nor do they care. To me "golf is too slow" sounds like road rage. Golf is not instant gratification. Never has been. Need will be.
    • I started playing with them a few months ago and it took me about a month to get used to them seeing that I was coming off of players irons (Mizuno).  Getting much longer distances and can still work the ball well.  I needed more forgiveness which they provide.    Mizuno 7 iron distance was around 160-165.  Getting average 175 with the AP1's and if I really crank it (with the right weather conditions) have gotten the ball into the 185-190 range.  So, would say I am getting about a 10-15 yard added distance with these irons.   Its pretty remarkable how hot clubs are getting now.  Its allowing everyone to have a chance to play good golf as they age.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Cwmgr
      Cwmgr
      (40 years old)
    2. Gfleck067
      Gfleck067
      (28 years old)
    3. golf82
      golf82
      (58 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon