Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4534 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

Looking to upgrade from a stock TM 56* RAC and a 60* ATV, I get OK spin I guess, but I'm really looking for more. I see the new 588 RTX looks good, then I see mention of the DG spinner shafts, would going to those wedges and adding the shafts be pretty much the most spin you could get out of a conforming club?


Posted

Why would you like more spin?

All the tour pro's try to get the spin off the ball.

I personally think spin comes more from a ball than from a wedge.

I think if you have stop control it's fine. I can attack all pins and count

on it that the ball will stop within 2 feet of where it landed. I'm happy with that result.

Spin and amount off spin is just not to control

Dirver: Mizuno JPX 825 9,5 Fujikura Orochi Red Eye Stiff 65 g.
3 wood: Mizuno JPX 825 14 Fujikura Orochi Red Eye Stiff 75 g.
Hybrid: Mizuno JPX 825 18 Fujikura Orochi Red Eye Stiff 85 g. 
Irons: Mizuno MP 59 3 / PW KBS Tour stiff shaft ( Golf Pride Niion )
Wedges: Taylormade ATV Wedges 52 and 58 ( Golf Pride Niion )
putter: Taylormade ghost series 770 35 inch ( Super Stroke slim 3.0 )
Balls: Taylormade TP 5


Posted

well from the statement "you can attack all pins and stop the ball within 2ft from where it landed" is just completely impossible. I'm looking for more spin to get the ball closer to the pin for par saves usually, rather than taking a 10ft+ usually for a 2 putt bogey. I am a decent spin player already, but I would much rather have as much as possible and then be able to take it off when needed.


Posted

It's the wedge where you make the best contact with the ball and that means looking at the grind and bounce that fits you for the best club-turf interaction.

Look at shaft, sole grind, bounce, and then grooves - but they all try to be aggressive.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As tomvk said, spin is also related to the ball.

In choosing wedges, you need to match wedge bounce and sole grind to your swing, and the normal course conditions you play. A wedge fitting can help you choose bounce and grind.

And, you need to drop your chips and pitches on the proper landing spot, so they will release - or spin back - to where you want the ball to end up.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I don't think the OEM you get a wedge from matters. They are all good wedges. What matters is the shaft/ball combo you use. That will maximize spin.

With that said, I agree 100% with getting the right sole and grind for your swing and playing conditions. If you show up with 4 degrees of bounce on the course I regularly play in the summer (wet and soft), it will be a long day.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted

I do plan on playing with the bounce and hopefully a few shafts, but grind? Ideally, my question was, all things being equal, what is the spinniest wedge stock for stock?


Posted

Theyre all pretty comparable.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S


  • Moderator
Posted
Originally Posted by res0n0xg

I do plan on playing with the bounce and hopefully a few shafts, but grind? Ideally, my question was, all things being equal, what is the spinniest wedge stock for stock?

They major brands will all be very close because they maximize the grooves against the regulations.  I play Vokey Spin Milled, but have also had Cleveland.  I preferred the sole shape of the Vokey a bit better and have the highest bounce offered for both my 54 and 58.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Igree boggey, but i dont like going for the spin,the big brand balls will just spin naturaly once you hit then with the wegde correctly, rhe problem wirh the spin is once you miss the spin you are off the green.....those milled wedge are a rrue wonder they just spin the ball with out you even wanted to do it....i play 3layers and those wdges make my ball spin really good

Posted
If ya can find some try the Cleveland cg15 wedges, they're about 3 seasons old, can be picked up at half the price of the 588rtx, and are spinny as a spinning top on ice! I think they're soon to be illegal on tour, but still allowed in pro am, club comps etc.

Gaz Lee


Posted

Don't take this the wrong way, but if you're using a urethane coated ball already, the biggest thing that'll make a difference is your ball strike. Grinds/shafts etc might make some difference but they'll never make a great deal of difference if you're not hitting the ball as crisply as possible.

As for actual wedges, they're all pretty much of a muchness.

Home Course: Wollaton Park GC, Nottingham, U.K.

Ping G400, 9°, Alta CB 55S | Ping G400, 14°, Alta CB 65S | Adams Pro Dhy 18°, 21°, 24°, KBS Hybrid S | Ping S55 5-PW, TT DGS300 | Vokey 252-08, DGS200 | Vokey 256-10 (bent to 58°), DGS200 | Ping Sigma G Anser, 34" | Vice Pro Plus

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Picked up an assortment of used cg15 and one callaway x forged MD 56. Had one pure shot with it on a flat green and boy did it come back well. I'm excited to see this x forged into some back stop greens and maybe look to get it in a 60 as well. Need to do some more testing with cg15s still.... I mostly use urethane 3pc balls, hex chrome plus prov1x are my usual.

Posted

The correct sole grind helps you hit the ball more crisply - the ones that fit you offer forgiveness.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4534 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.