• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
1484

Driver that plays like the RBZ 3W

4 posts in this topic

I have the RBZ 3W HL and the RBZ driver (the first model, not the newest one).  I have had really great results with the 3W both off the deck and off the tee.  So much so that for several months I stopped hitting the driver altogether because I was better off in the fairway with less distance than vice versa.  In any case, I'm not super knowledgeable about club design and specs and am wondering how to translate what I like about the 3W into the search for a new driver.  In other words, what is about the 3W (COG, weighting, etc) that makes it so sweet.  Both my teaching pro and some of the forum posts I've read seem to confirm that the RBZ 3W is a better club than the driver from that line.  How do I find those same characteristics in a driver and get back that lost distance!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

If you hit the 3W really well, a stronger 3W you use just off the tee might work for you.

Some have developed a driver-length 3W, which has been called a thriver, and Hireko golf actually makes one.

Or, you might stay in the RBZ family. The original RBZ Tour and Tour TP models came with a TS 13* and a 14.5* 3W. Same with the RBZ Stage 2 Tour (Rocket Fuel S shaft at 70 grams) and Tour TP (Matrix RUL 80 S shaft at 80 grams). All these come at 43.5" length shaft as standard.

Not sure what shaft flex you use, but you might get a stronger head and pair it with the shaft you need. A strong 3W you play mainly off the tee might really work well, if you generally hit good FWs.

This would be similar to the Callaway XHot Pro 3Deep that Phil Mickelson plays off the tee. (3Deep has deeper face then the RBZ Stage 2 line, which has a lower profile than the original RBZ). 3Deep comes with lofts of 13* and 14.5*.)

TM might be able to give you a slightly longer shaft, if they could rebalance the swingweight at the factory.

If you now have the standard RBZ with the stock 45-gram shaft, the RBZ Stage 2 may feel heavier when you swing them.

-------------------------------------

Note: I used the standard RBZ 3WHL last season, but for every good shot I got a hook miss (often disastrous). The 45-gram shaft was just too light. Switched to Tour Edge Exotics XRail 4W with a heavier shaft - works much better for me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I have a related question- are their club design limitations (rules) that may work to limit the distance of Drivers more than they would limit the distance of a 3W?  i.e. is it possible to design a 3W with more of a trampoline effect than a legal driver?

This could explain why 'hot" 3Ws are becoming the new driver for some??

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by MEfree

I have a related question- are their club design limitations (rules) that may work to limit the distance of Drivers more than they would limit the distance of a 3W?  i.e. is it possible to design a 3W with more of a trampoline effect than a legal driver?

This could explain why 'hot" 3Ws are becoming the new driver for some??

Don't know the answer to your first question.

As far as 3Ws go, the extra heat has to do with the synergistic positioning of multiple materials in the heads. Examples from Callaway and Tour Edge:

The XCG6 further offers both lightweight AD40 and midweight Matrix Ozik shaft options.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • I like it. Especially compared to nearly all past US Ryder Cup kits. Actually before I dish out too much praise, do they have a huge Stars and Stripes flag emblazoned on the back?
    • I would say it depends on what club you're talking about. For drivers I would say that the best performing drivers of all time have been made within the last five years. Aerodynamics, material science, and the proliferation of launch monitors and data driven design have resulted in improvements across the board in distance and forgiveness as of late. I know that I personally saw a decent improvement on my G10 when I switched to a G30, in that I gained between 10 and 15 yards without sacrificing accuracy. This is on the high end of what aerodynamics can provide though, simply because higher swing speeds receive a greater benefit from decreased drag. Depending on the individual you may not see much difference so long as the driver itself was made within the last ten years or so. For irons I would be inclined to say that the main difference in the irons of yesteryear and the irons of today is forgiveness. The irons made today are much easier to hit than previous irons, simply because they aren't as drastically punishing on mis-hits as the old blades. The PING Eye2 irons seemed to be the first "widespread" GI iron that sparked the trend towards irons that were easier for the layman to hit. That being said, I found my s55 irons (their "blade" from several years ago) to be more forgiving than the Eye2's. Based on that and observations from other clubs I have hit I would say the average golfer would be best suited by irons made within the last 10 to 15 years that are in good condition with sharp grooves. If you play muscleback irons though, there's pretty much zero difference between modern "true" musclebacks and those of yore, though the current muscle-cavity irons (like the iBlade and MP-15) will likely be at least a bit easier to hit than the older blades while maintaining a similar style.  Wedges are the only thing that I would argue the "latest and greatest" provides a tangible benefit for. The reasoning for this is entirely different however, in that it's based solely off the condition of the grooves in older wedges. As wedges grow old, and get used, the grooves wear to the point that there becomes a noticeable performance difference - especially when playing out of the rough. For this reason alone do I say that the average golfer (assuming they golf at least once a week during the golfing season) is best suited by wedges no older than two or three years old.  Putters are the odd man out here. I don't think it matters in the slightest when your putter was manufactured, so long as you keep a reasonable grip on it so that it doesn't slip out of your hands. I personally am a fan of the newer milled putters for the feel they provide, but it doesn't mean I couldn't probably putt nearly as well with an original Anser putter in the same style. I think the average golfer is best suited by whatever putter style and features allow them to consistently roll the ball along their target line, with no age requirement. In summary, considering the advancement of technology, I would feel comfortable putting these "maximum age caps" on equipment for the average weekend golfer to get the most out of his/her game: Drivers: ~10 years old or newer Irons: ~15 years old or newer Wedges: ~3 years old or newer Putter: Whatever works best for you That being said, you may still enjoy the game with any kind of equipment out there. I just think that equipment that follows these guidelines will let the average weekend golfer get about as much as they can out of their game without necessarily breaking the bank. Like @iacas said, you may find incremental improvements by purchasing the R1 over an old G5 but the question then becomes whether or not this improvement is worth the price difference. This question can only be answered by the person buying the club. It can't be denied, however, that a driver from the 1960's will be severely outclassed by the G5 and the R1, making either of them a much better choice than the 1960's driver. Interestingly enough, I have had the desire to go the opposite way for a while now. I bought the s55's my last go around, and I'm thinking that my next set of irons will be a more "traditional" muscleback iron (since the s55 is mostly a CB), along the likes of the MP-4 irons by Mizuno. I hit the ball consistently enough that I don't care about the lack of forgiveness, and I believe that the wonderful look and feel of those irons, along with the little bit of extra vertical control (can thin it slightly to make punch shots even easier) would offset whatever I lose in forgiveness. I know that I would most certainly never go to an iron like the AP2, the G, or the M2. The chunky look of the club (along with the offset) gets into my head nowadays and makes me feel uncomfortable standing over the ball in a manner similar to how I used to be intimidated by the look of blades at address. I would gain forgiveness, but at the price of distance and trajectory control - an unacceptable trade for me considering I value distance and trajectory control much more highly than forgiveness.
    • My newest clubs are pretty old. Maybe 2006? I don't really remember. The other day, just for the heck of it,  I played using my old Bazooka Iron Woods. (2i-LW) Shot my normal score. Those Ironwoods are probably 15-16 years old. I don't think at this stage of my life, that a new set would make that much difference. 
    • My irons are from 1978, driver and woods from 2004 (same G5 as you)....at my current playing level, I don't feel like my clubs are holding my scores back. I will be updating my wedges to something designed this century in the near future but I'll probably regrip and keep playing my grandfather's old Eye irons a couple more years. There's something to be said about being familiar with your equipment too. The control you talk about with your driver comes from hitting a lot of balls with it and getting to know how it responds to different things. That's tough to give up considering that it could take weeks to develop that relationship with a new driver...at least that helps me cure the new toy bug and keep the wallet closed. :)
    • Hah, I was thinking the same thing when I saw that pic go up on the landing page.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. mahariji_slice
      mahariji_slice
      (35 years old)
  • Blog Entries