Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4604 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Hi, I'm new to golf, I'm 26, I played a little while in school but never seriously, and recently started playing properly I have the bug and have been putting serious time into the game I've joined a private course and been given a handicap of 20.0. I have friends who play single figure handicaps, I've been playing less than 3 months and my best score has been +15 I've scored this twice and I've had 3 birdies in a single round and 8 pars in a separate single round, I can par all the SI 1 holes on the courses I've played and I've set a goal of 15.0 by the end of the year and 5 or better by the end of next year. Are my goals realistic and how high can I set my goals at my age without any serious history in golf can I become a scratch golfer and maybe turn pro or is this a myth that most new players get carries away with? Replies appreciated.

Posted

Keep it up, you can easily go pro in a couple of months - maybe even force tiger to retire

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
What an idiot you are.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

You say you were "given a handicap of 20.0".  Was this an earned handicap based on posted scores, or something they sort of assigned when you joined the private course?  I ask because the two were stated together as one sequence.  If it is an assigned handicap, vs. an earned handicap, the answer to 15 may lie in what you earn when enough scores are posted.  If you are playing to an earned 20.0 today, I too think 15 in two months is a bit optimistic.  But you should be able to get it down to 15 and below in pretty short order if you practice right and keep your mind together on the course.

A 5 by the end of next year... well, again, if you work at it hard and smart, and get some good instruction, perhaps.  I have been finding that going from 20 to 15 wasn't too hard.  It took me a lot more work to get from 15 to my current 10.3 (gotta update my sig).   I think I should be able to get into the upper single digits next year, but 5 is perhaps optimistic for me.  But I'm way over 23 and sort of lazy so you may be able to make it.  The progression seems to be somewhat exponential though.

I think scratch (real scratch) golfers are a rare breed.

Driver: Titleist 913 D2 10.5*, Aldila RIP Phenom 50

Fairway 1: Titleist 913F, 17*, Titleist Bassara W55

Fairway 2: Titleist 913F, 21*, Titleist Bassara W55

Irons: Titleist AP1 714 5-PW, Aerotech Steelfiber i95

Wedges: SCOR 4161 48/52/56/60, Genius 9

Grips: GolfPride New Decade Red Mid-size on all of the above.

Putter: Scotty Cameron Newport 2 - Super Stroke Slim 3.0


Posted

At the end of 2012 I was sitting at a 24 handicap based on my league scores. With some help from a gentleman at the local practice facility over the winter and early spring I am now down to 17.7. As the previous poster stated the initial drop is the easiest as you are hitting woods and irons better. The real test as I am finding out is in the short game from 100 yds in. During the summer I was practicing chipping, pitching and putting a minimum 3 hours a week and still didn't get to where I wanted to be. The run down to 10 or even single digits will be the hardest part. If you can find a local muni that has an all-day rate like we have here where you pay $20 for unlimited golf that is where you can get full course practice and as long as you aren't holding anyone up get some wedge and putting practice on a real course instead of on astroturf mats. If you can find a course like that, head out on a Saturday or Sunday after 5 or 6 PM when everyone else is done for the day and take about 2 dozen balls to get your yardages dialed in on your wedges then practice putting from different lengths with emphasis on lag putting to within 1-2 feet. But remember one thing, the guy who has been helping me once told me I would hit at least 10,000 range balls and still only get it maybe half right.


Posted

You say you were "given a handicap of 20.0".  Was this an earned handicap based on posted scores, or something they sort of assigned when you joined the private course?  I ask because the two were stated together as one sequence.  If it is an assigned handicap, vs. an earned handicap, the answer to 15 may lie in what you earn when enough scores are posted.  If you are playing to an earned 20.0 today, I too think 15 in two months is a bit optimistic.  But you should be able to get it down to 15 and below in pretty short order if you practice right and keep your mind together on the course.

A 5 by the end of next year... well, again, if you work at it hard and smart, and get some good instruction, perhaps.  I have been finding that going from 20 to 15 wasn't too hard.  It took me a lot more work to get from 15 to my current 10.3 (gotta update my sig).   I think I should be able to get into the upper single digits next year, but 5 is perhaps optimistic for me.  But I'm way over 23 and sort of lazy so you may be able to make it.  The progression seems to be somewhat exponential though.

I think scratch (real scratch) golfers are a rare breed.

No i handed my first three cards that i played with my friend who is a member in and was given a handicap of 20.0 but I play better than the cards that I handed in now as I had only been playing properly for a few weeks at the time so im getting better pretty quick.

I agree and anticipate hitting a wall with my fast improvements and that around the 10-15 handicap mark I may hit a wall but I practice a lot and work shifts so get plenty of time to do so and ill keep trying to improve and see what happens.

I feel that if I can cut out my silly mistakes that will help a lot but im guessing that is everyone's problem and if we didn't make mistakes we would all have a really low handicap but time will tell.

cheers


Posted

Its possible. I'm living proof. I first picked up a golf club aged 30, played in a work outing and shot 134. I loved it from the first minute and practiced like hell for the next few weeks until the next game and shot 99. I then joined my local club a few months later and was given 18 as my first handicap and 18 months later was off 5. I've not had the time to put into golf the last 5 years but I've never been worse than 5 since and i can play to my handicap if i only play once or twice a month with no practice. I'm currently off 3. Anything is possible and everyone is different.

Posted

As already been mentioned, it's not that bad to get down to the 15. It's the road to low double, high single that is harder to achieve and especially to mantain... short game will be what makes the difference in the scoring. 32 or less putts per round, and up and downs is what makes the difference between a 5 and a 10 in my opinion

Francesco Driver: :titleist: 910 D2 8.5* PX Tour 7C3 6.0 - Wood: :titleist: 910 F.d 15* PX Tour 8C4 6.0 - Hybrid: :titleist: 910H 19* PX Tour HD2 6.0 - Irons: :titleist: ZB Forged 4-PW S300 - Wedges: :vokey: 52*.08, 56*.11, 60*.04 - Putter: :titleist: Studio Select Newport 2 35" - Ball: :titleist: ProV1x - Bag: :titleist: Midsize Staff - :bushnell: Tour V2


Posted
If you start off swinging correctly, and start striking the ball well from the start it can be done. I have never really seen this happen. Everyone I've seen has a serious swing flaw, one kind or another. If they are good, they usually tell me it took them two to three years with a good swing and decent ball striking. My son's handicap just dropped from 15 to single digits this last month. Something just clicked this last month. His swing has been pretty decent for the past year or so, and his coach has been refining things for him. I don't really know enough about ball striking to know what the last few lessons showed him that made everything seem to click. My own handicap is not dropping yet, but I just started to develop a decent swing this last month. My old "swing" was able to occasionally knock balls around into the hole in a decent number of strokes. My new swing is much faster and easier, and if I could aim correctly would put me on the green in regulation many times. I feel like it will be about half a year to a year before something good will happen, and this will put me on the same path as most of the people I talked to.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The main difference I notice between myself and someone off say 10 is that my long game is much more consistent. I play with lots of people who can putt and get it up and down fairly well but they are in trouble too much off the tee or putting far too much pressure on their short game too often. Eventually that pressure shows no matter who you are. I play with a guy off 9 who has a really solid short game but he has a huge slice generally with his long clubs and it kills him. I'd say he was scratch short game and 25 long game.

Posted
Quote:

Originally Posted by virtuaframax

As already been mentioned, it's not that bad to get down to the 15. It's the road to low double, high single that is harder to achieve and especially to mantain... short game will be what makes the difference in the scoring. 32 or less putts per round, and up and downs is what makes the difference between a 5 and a 10 in my opinion

The main difference I notice between myself and someone off say 10 is that my long game is much more consistent. I play with lots of people who can putt and get it up and down fairly well but they are in trouble too much off the tee or putting far too much pressure on their short game too often. Eventually that pressure shows no matter who you are. I play with a guy off 9 who has a really solid short game but he has a huge slice generally with his long clubs and it kills him. I'd say he was scratch short game and 25 long game.

Long game is what's killing me, and my longer long game is getting me into more trouble these days. Need to practice a lot more tee shots.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I learnt to play the game with some old Mizuno TP 9 blades that I bought on EBay for about £80. The pro at my first club said I was mad for using them but I honestly believe I am a better ball striker as a result because there's nowhere to hide with blades. The game is made so much easier these days with forgiving clubs that people don't get the feedback from the club to learn when they aren't hitting it correctly. IMHO one of the most disregarded factors of shot dispersion is where the ball contacts the face. Learn how to hit the ball consistently out of the middle and then straighten your flight if necessary. Look at a tour pro's clubs and they have a nice ball shaped mark which they wear out in the middle of clubs ( especially wedges) look at a 10 handicap and the club will have marks all over it and sky marks on the driver. I don't use blades now btw. I'm not completely mad :-D

Posted
Good luck. I am trying to get better too. It's all about clean contact to the ball and lessons. You need to cute your swing flaws before you get used to them. That's what I am doing

Note: This thread is 4604 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 41, June 14.  I spent 10 minutes, half hitting W half hitting 6-iron, practice shots (indoors, off a mat, into a net)
    • Day 620 - 2026-06-14 Got some work in before and after lessons. Definitely didn't adduct my arms 130° in doing so.
    • Day 79: played 18. Shot a +5 76. Iron play was much better - 11 GIR. Hit a drive 380. Normal day. 
    • Day 14 (14 Jun 26) - Continued work with irons (8i-Pw), hard foam balls and getting consistent impact - same as previous drills - using gates for 1/2 and “simulated” course conditions on the second half.  
    • I like discussing the golf swing. Whether you call it "swing theory" or what, I like to talk about things that can expand the potential for what I know and understand. As a scientist, I like being shown that I'm wrong, too, because as I've said a bunch of times… "you're wrong and here's why" is an instant opportunity to upgrade my knowledge. I also like to help golfers, and one of the things I'm most glad to have moved away from from 15 years ago was the "Hands In" idea from S&T. Jim Waldron is often credited (probably rightly so) with explaining why so many Tour players and good players talk about "keeping their hands in front of themselves" while it appears that they're moving their arms around their bodies. From over 30 years ago: I've also got videos like… this (Instagram link here😞 I'm happy to say that I've become friends with Shaun and Mike at Athletic Motion Golf (AMG), too. I tend to get along with other smart folks who measure things, who look critically at information, who don't assume that what they thought 20 years ago holds true today. I get along with folks who look for chances to instantly upgrade their knowledge. Andy Plummer remains one of the people who does not look for these opportunities. He didn't care in early 2013 when we had evidence that the information in their S&T 2.0 DVDs was bogus, and they seemingly don't care now. They've been attacking (it's their favorite pastime) AMG in particular for the better part of a year now. There have been a few shots back at them from AMG (like… this), no doubt. But as is typical of the AMG fellas, it's with measured data. Well, recently, Andy took yet another shot at AMG: https://www.instagram.com/p/DZfHe0DuPXC/. Andy demonstrates that true power in the golf swing comes from doing stuff like this: Andy claims that the idea that the arms mostly lift and lower, while the body turns, is bogus. What golfers should be doing is using "angular velocity" to abduct and adduct their shoulders to move the club fast like this (above). Then he makes a ridiculous example of what AMG supposedly teaches, but misses by a mile. Now, it doesn't take a biomechanist to know that you can't possibly swing as Andy demonstrates. His right arm is so far around and behind him that his left arm would have to grow several feet to reach the grip of the club (or alignment stick), and a follow-through with the right arm position like that would be absolutely silly. But, it's a demonstration, so let's not read too much into it. However, I find ideas like this dangerous. Again, I like to help golfers, and in my opinion, the idea that you should abduct and adduct your arms a lot is a dangerous one. There's some adduction and abduction going on, but… it's not much. Anyway, this statement was posted: 130 degrees of dynamic range of horizontal abduction and adduction is quite the claim! I posted some comments to Andy and others, and was issued a challenge: Well, okay then. Here's Bryson's lead shoulder adduction: This measures the angle between the "virtual spine," the left shoulder, and the elbow. Bryson has a 97.34° "adduction angle" at P1, a 62.53° angle at P4, and returns to an 89.21° angle at impact. Rounding, that's a change of 34° from address to the top, and then a change (back toward the angle at address) of about 26° from the top to impact. If we want to worry about only horizontal abduction and adduction (where D = adduction and B = abduction): Left shoulder: 8.33° D, 38.74° D, 14.67° D Right shoulder: 1.03° D, 55.75° B, 14.04° B If we call moving the arms farther around you as negative, those are changes of -30.41° from P1 to P4 for the left shoulder and +24.07° from P4 to P7 for the left shoulder and -56.78° and +41.71° for the right shoulder. I have no idea on earth where he gets 130°. From the last frame of Bryson's swing where he's at 126.98°? But the lowest that number gets is 62.53°, for a range of 64.45, or less than half of the 130° claimed (plus it includes part of the swing, post-impact, that has no bearing on what the ball does). For good measure, another pretty good player: Left: 22.55° D ➡️ 33.35° D (∆ 10.8°) ➡️ 17.36° D (∆ 15.99° from P4, 5.19° from P1) Right: 15.03° D ➡️ 24.29° B (∆ 39.32°) ➡️ 1.93° D (∆ 26.22° from P4, 13.1° from P1) Of the biomechanists and experienced 3D users (on any platform), none of them have seen anything like 130° of dynamic adduction/abduction from a good player P1 to P7. And, like my little joke above, even if you go to the end of the swing, you rarely get much more than a little over halfway there. Maybe Andy is adding them? He does say in the video "and then add it to that with the lead arm." (I think that's what he says, but this isn't an additive type system.) I regularly coach golfers out of positions with a lot of adduction and abduction. I regularly work golfers away from moving their arms around their bodies. Even my juniors (the ones who have paid attention anyway! 🤣) can recite "arms = up/down, body = around." Like this: So, I don't know where this leaves us. Andy claims to have seen something on GEARS that shows 130° of dynamic adduction/abduction. I'm open to being wrong, but… I don't think I am here on this one. And, until that comes to be, I will continue to stand up for what I think is the best information, and do my best to work with golfers toward simpler, easier moves that don't get them stuck. Simpler, easier moves like the moves Tour players and great players tend to make, not complicated, difficult moves. Shaun and Mike said it in a video once where they demonstrated that the average Tour player adducts their lead arm 20° across their chest from the top to impact (P4 to P7), while the amateur often tries to go 40°. They said something like "the amateur is trying to move their arm TWICE the distance in the same amount of time as the professional athlete." Yep. The swings of great players are often easier and simpler. They are not abducting and adducting their arms much in comparison to average golfers. As a smart man once said: "Why would you teach something (abduction in this case) that bad golfers already do?" On a related note… the S&T crowd continues to be… well, who they've been as long as I've known them. Take this comment for example: I mean… I would think that this is pretty self-explanatory, but then again… I didn't think it needed explaining to begin with. P.S. As I was finishing up this article, another biomechanist replied with something so simple I hadn't even thought of it as I had immediately jumped into looking at the actual measurements: "90 doesn’t even seem physically possible.“ No, sir. It doesn't.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.