Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Technology advancements making courses longer and longer !


Note: This thread is 4229 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

When does the sheer length of a course become the greatest obstacle?  Is that more important than creating holes that tax our abilities with the cut shot, drawing the ball with long irons,  Obstacles in the fairway, and increased use of water hazards ?   What is more important, length or complexity ?


Posted

Welcome to TST!

For me, length is probably the least creative way to protect par, but a course that is very demanding of your shotmaking can also get old fast if you're not looking for a drawn out battle. If it's really forcing a certain shot, or excessively penalizing a mistake or certain ball flight, complexity doesn't make the course better. But at least an overly long course has forward tees; playing a ridiculously hard one from the front can only help so much. Water hazards just suck, especially those which like to funnel balls from anywhere near the edge. It's one thing if it's spicing up a pro event on TV, but honestly I'd rather take the penalty and keep my ball, thank you very much.

A good course needs to be able to stage a good match against a variety of players IMO, with strokes and tees negotiated of course. My brother and I will sometimes compete and I do like the challenge of extra length, and especially if I can get into a rhythm hitting fairways and getting flat lies to big greens. He's trying to scramble every hole while I'm trying to get a GIR, so if I can accomplish that, even if I need to get aggressive off the tee, I will end up winning most of the time. The more holes I need to take an iron off the tee or lay up, the more ground he can make up around the greens. A good course can have a balance; for example 3 of the par 3s don't need to be over 200 yards and some of the par 4s and 5s should be good driving holes.

In My Bag:

Adams Super LS 9.5˚ driver, Aldila Phenom NL 65TX
Adams Super LS 15˚ fairway, Kusala black 72x
Adams Super LS 18˚ fairway, Aldila Rip'd NV 75TX
Adams Idea pro VST hybrid, 21˚, RIP Alpha 105x
Adams DHY 24˚, RIP Alpha 89x
5-PW Maltby TE irons, KBS C taper X, soft stepped once 130g
Mizuno T4, 54.9 KBS Wedge X
Mizuno R12 60.5, black nickel, KBS Wedge X
Odyssey Metal X #1 putter 
Bridgestone E5, Adidas samba bag, True Linkswear Stealth
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

although courses are becoming longer and the ball and clubs are allowing for some of that increase in distance, but  with this technolgy dispersion is also becoming tighter.

That said keep the course at their length but there needs to be a grass roots movement for the better of the game to play the correct tee boxes for maximize enjoyment. I'd like to see at least 5 tee boxes for example.


Posted

I have read/heard? that the hardest thing to overcome for the average golfer is length.  It certainly seems like that to me.

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
although courses are becoming longer and the ball and clubs are allowing for some of that increase in distance, but  with this technolgy dispersion is also becoming tighter.

That said keep the course at their length but there needs to be a grass roots movement for the better of the game to play the correct tee boxes for maximize enjoyment. I'd like to see at least 5 tee boxes for example.

100% agree on this. I think rangers need to be taking a more aggressive stance on making sure players are playing from the correct tee box. They know the course the best, and should have a good grasp on who's level plays where.

That or have a sign out that says, "Handicap Recommendations" then list the range versus the Tee Box.

Welcome to TST!

For me, length is probably the least creative way to protect par, but a course that is very demanding of your shotmaking can also get old fast if you're not looking for a drawn out battle. If it's really forcing a certain shot, or excessively penalizing a mistake or certain ball flight, complexity doesn't make the course better. But at least an overly long course has forward tees; playing a ridiculously hard one from the front can only help so much. Water hazards just suck, especially those which like to funnel balls from anywhere near the edge. It's one thing if it's spicing up a pro event on TV, but honestly I'd rather take the penalty and keep my ball, thank you very much.

I'd agree with that on length. I'd say keep courses shorter, but just up the toughness if you put yourself out of position. If you want to hit driver, fine. We'll put more bunkers where drivers could land. We'll grow the rough up. We'll tighten the fairways. Make it so it is a good risk reward scenario.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think pin placements makes the courses tougher, and the average golfer can struggle with this.

As if golf isn't hard enough, they have to tuck pins close to bunkers, near the very front edge, near the back edge, etc. Oh how I hate difficult pin placements. Now in tournaments I can understand this, but on a normal Saturday afternoon when the course is packed, all this creates is backups and slows play down.

I also agree with the length and tee recommendations. The starter should be responsible for asking or telling everybody in the group which tee boxes they need to play. Way too many 30 handicaps out there playing the middle and back tees, see it all the time.

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha 10.5* 

3WD:  Callaway Big Bertha 15* / X2 Hot H4 Hybrid
Irons:  Callaway Apex 4-PW Project X 5.5 shafts

Wedges: Callaway MackDaddy 2  52/58
Putter: Odyessey Metal X Milled 1


Posted
I must be in a different are then you guys. I don't really ever see people playing the back tees. My group of friends and I always play there and almost every time we get paired with people they make some comments about it being to hard from back there. That being said I don't like when they put pins just on one side of a ridge. Most of us aren't good enough to leave approach shots in the right spot all the time.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I have read/heard? that the hardest thing to overcome for the average golfer is length.  It certainly seems like that to me.


it wouldn't be if they moved up to the tee that fits them.

100% agree on this. I think rangers need to be taking a more aggressive stance on making sure players are playing from the correct tee box. They know the course the best, and should have a good grasp on who's level plays where.

That or have a sign out that says, "Handicap Recommendations" then list the range versus the Tee Box.

I'd agree with that on length. I'd say keep courses shorter, but just up the toughness if you put yourself out of position. If you want to hit driver, fine. We'll put more bunkers where drivers could land. We'll grow the rough up. We'll tighten the fairways. Make it so it is a good risk reward scenario.

so true but in reality it doesn't work because many golfers are offended by this. Can't tell you how many times i have watched a player say I paid my money and will play the tees I want. The result usually is they shoot 120 and say the course stinks lol


Posted

Courses are getting longer from the tips, if you play the right tee box they aren't any longer than they were 10 years ago.  Ego's are a bigger problem than technology and longer courses.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

it wouldn't be if they moved up to the tee that fits them.

so true but in reality it doesn't work because many golfers are offended by this. Can't tell you how many times i have watched a player say I paid my money and will play the tees I want. The result usually is they shoot 120 and say the course stinks lol

A fool and his money are soon parted!!  I wish they would realize that they stink and should be playing forward.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4229 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.