Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4092 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Wait, Holland and The Netherlands ARE the same thing, no? I've been to both and it was at the same moment in time. What am I missing?

Holland doesn't exist as a nation state, in the same way Hawaii doesn't. Unlike Hawaii though, Holland is the influential region of the Netherlands and has a degree of proud independence. It's really a question of how people identify themselves.

I'm not sure what the American equivalent would be. The nearest I can come up with would be someone from Dallas identifying themselves as a Texan before they admitted to being American. You can bet your life though that if you went to Europe and spoke to someone, you'd pick the wrong the side. Europe is riddled with these

American Presidents still use the country name England to refer to the UK (albeit the present incumbent isn't the worst offender - that was Reagan)

Catalans, Basques and Castillion Spanish is another one

Walloons and Flems in Belgium

Italy has a north south split compounded by a history city states (Venice recently held a referendum to annex itself from Italy)

Come to think of it Scotland, is voting in the next few weeks for independence (well they're voting against independence as it happens - but we'll see)


Posted

I don't agree with you FF. Yes, Holland in the Netherlands is like Texas or Hawaii (or any other state) in USA. But no-one in the province of Holland will feel themselves more like 'Hollandish' then from the Netherlands. It's just a language-mistake that got very common. Noord Holland and Zuid Holland, like every province, have their own flag for ceremonial purposes, but really not 1 person living there will use it over the Dutch flag. It really is just a translation or usuage of language matter that people say Holland instead of the Netherlands, and has absolutely nothing to do with people identifying themselves like for example Scottish, Walloons, Catalans etc do......

~Jorrit

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Holland is to The Netherlands as say The South or New England are to the USA. One a region, the other a nation. Never knew this until about 6 weeks ago, but all nonetheless true! Proof that even a goofball like me can learn things from time to time.Ha!


Posted
Interesting, not sure why I never knew this. Thanks for the education all!

In my Bag: Driver: Titelist 913 D3 9.5 deg. 3W: TaylorMade RBZ 14.5 3H: TaylorMade RBZ 18.5 4I - SW: TaylorMade R7 TP LW: Titelist Vokey 60 Putter: Odyssey 2-Ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

But no-one in the province of Holland will feel themselves more like 'Hollandish' then from the Netherlands.

It's those outside the provence who don't enjoy being described as Hollanders (in my experience) albeit they could be acting a bit

The New England Confederation is of course the better example

It takes on an economic dimension as a city like London (Holland) is surrounded by places that aren't really part of it (The Netherlands) the people who live in these satelittes often get narked when you ask them where they come from, and they say "Watford" when you then turn round and say "Oh London then"

Watford ain't London, but it falls under London's influence to such an extent that outsiders bracket it as having been consumed thus. Those outside of it though prefer to have their separation from the dominant entity


Posted
Well, I live in Utrecht (so outside the province Holland), but as you can see earlier this thread I also used the word Holland instead of the Netherlands. Also the Dutch national team is often cheered with a song 'Hup Holland hup'. Anyway, we are getting a bit carried away in this offtopic issue I guess :-)

~Jorrit

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
...er, back to the Europen team? The Westwood who played on Sunday in the WGC would be a cert for a Captain's pick. The Westwood impersonator who played in the Open and the US Open, not so much. We'll have to wait and see which one turns up at the PGA.

The more I practise, the luckier I hope to get.


Posted
I'm surprised more people haven't heard of Luiten.... European Locks: -Rory McIlroy -Sergio Garcia -Victor Dubuisson -Henrik Stenson -Justin Rose -Martin Kaymer Probably getting in -Thomas Bjorn -Graeme McDowell -Jamie Donaldson Captains Pick Options -Ian Poulter -Luke Donald -Stephen Gallacher -Joost Luiten -Miguel Angel Jimenez -Lee Westwood Outside The Box Options -Jonas Blixt -Francesco Molinari I think Ian Poulter pretty much is a must-have. He's been playing pretty poorly but his game really comes out for the Ryder Cup. My gut feeling is that the other two will be the Englishmen. I would love to see Jimenez get a nod, but I don't think he will. Luiten and Gallacher have decent shots, but I don't think they will get in. If the captains picks are Poulter, Westwood, and Donald the team would look like this -Rory McIlroy -Sergio Garcia -Victor Dubuisson -Henrik Stenson -Justin Rose -Martin Kaymer -Thomas Bjorn -Graeme McDowell -Jamie Donaldson -Ian Poulter -Luke Donald -Lee Westwood. Yikes! That team is absolutely stacked. It will be tough sledding for the US

Riley


Posted

I'm not convinced Donaldson isn't going to get overtaken yet

Bjorn's place looks nailed down though

Luiten and Jiminez would be more left field thinking than Mollinari or Blixt I reckon. It's just possible of course that Blixt could be picked with an eye on pairing him with Stenson?

Funnily enough, as we blather away about the nations of Europe and how we identify ourselves, it always strikes me as unusual that Europe (a non country) manages to come together, whereas the genuinely sovereign US struggles (without invoking non golf stimuli).

I know that Europe's got round this periodically by setting up mini nation teams, and none had been more successful than the Spanish pairings which go at about 70%, so it's always possible that he could be looking at a Swede to pair with Stenson, albeit logic might make Kaymer the partner of choice there as another player that's the odd one out. Stenson and Kaymer look remarkably similar types though, with similar temperaments. They look like a decent pairing for a foursome I'd say

Incidentally, the pairings that have poorest performance (by some distance - its actually a losing record) are the Irish


Posted

Maybe, but the Ryder Cup is a stage, and sometimes we're looking for those with a bit of X factor to announce their arrival. It can go carnival and it can go bear pit.

I'm thinking that America will probably send Bubba out first and with his ropey temperament, plus a tendancy to say things which won't go down well in Scotland, Europe needs to think about how they can strike an early blow against him by bringing the crowd into play. We know he gets rattled away from home, and that's leading to me thinking what would happen if a pairing like Poulter and Gallacher were lay one on Bubba first up? It would be a little bit like watching the self styled invincible pairing of Mickelson and Woods getting gubbed twice on the first day and American hopes sank from there on in.


Posted
In my opinion Westwood doesn't deserve to be in the team this year at all. In (co) European Tour events in 2014 he only got 2 top 10 places, and since August 2013 a total of 3. I don't know if he besides that had top performances in PGA Tour only events, but this is not impressive at all. Luiten for example had 4 top tens (3 of them were top 5 actually) and two more top 15 in 2014 alone. Since august 2013 three more top 5 places (1 win).

~Jorrit

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Haha, I wish (in terms of having his quality in golf) :-D

~Jorrit

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Haha, I wish (in terms of having his quality in golf) :-D

Definitely Joost Luiten's brother. Why don't you pine for RJD? I might have to do some investigative journalism on your ass

Riley


Posted
the team would look like this

-Rory McIlroy

-Sergio Garcia

-Victor Dubuisson

-Henrik Stenson

-Justin Rose

-Martin Kaymer

-Thomas Bjorn

-Graeme McDowell

-Jamie Donaldson

-Ian Poulter

-Luke Donald

-Lee Westwood.

Yikes! That team is absolutely stacked. It will be tough sledding for the US

Gmac, Poulter, Bjorn, Dubuison, Donald, Westwood have been largely underachieving this year (at least on the PGA tour - none of them are setting the world on fire over here)  ... just not seeing this contest as a blowout, my eloquent European friend !

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Gmac, Poulter, Bjorn, Donald, Westwood have been largely underachieving this year (at least on the PGA tour) ... not seeing this contest as a blowout, my eloquent European friend !

Nah, more like a cynical American.

Riley


Posted
Definitely Joost Luiten's brother. Why don't you pine for RJD? I might have to do some investigative journalism on your ass

~Jorrit

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4092 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* ⬛⬛🟦⬛🟧 ⬛🟧🟧⬛🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 Awesome, @WillieT! Go get another!
    • Wordle 1,631 2/6* ⬛🟩🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.