Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

MatchPlay would be better for The Fed Ex Cup


Note: This thread is 3916 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Match play is my favorite format in golf. I watched the entire match on tv for the US amature, and I never heard of either player.

Beware of old dudes with old clubs and new grips.

 

 


Posted
Stenson vs. Ogilvy didn't turn out much for viewship and they were reasonably good players. Both were in the top 10.

One way to incorporate match play is to have the first week (the one between the PGA and FedEx cup be #80-144 and only the top whatever get into the FedEx Cup.

Or, you could have the set up the way it is, and then have the Championship be a 32 guy match play tourney. Same scenario though if Tiger and Phil lose early, then you have a final where it could be a couple guys like Slocum and Clark for the $10M. It would be exciting for them, but no Tiger and Phil on Sunday is bad for TV ratings.

Driver: 9.5 905R 757 Speeder X stiff
3 Wood: 13.0 Sonartec GS Tour Red Ice 70X
Hybrid: 17.0 Sonartec MD Stiff UST IROD
Irons: 690cb 4-PW w/Rifle 6.0
Wedges: Cleveland 900 Series Gunmetal 50, 54, 60Putter: Scotty Cameron Studio Newport 370g head


Posted
Greetings ....

As mentioned in an earlier post within this thread , I have conjured up my own version of a one event match-play playoff.

You can check out the latest results for 2007 here »» 2007 Fantasy Playoffs Results

The results are based mostly on play in the actual ongoing Tour Championship - however, there are a few "upsets".

Thanx-A-Lot, Frank-0-Sport

Disclaimer -- The "2007 Fantasy Playoffs Results" link is to a web-page authored by me. This is not intended to be a promotion of my site, but rather a means of providing information and insight relevant to this particular SandTrap.com discussion.

Posted
OK... while Tim Clark vs Heath Slocum would be a really boring final, I can't imagine anything being more dull than this years Tour Championship and FedEx Cup "finals". Yawn. I'm glad football was on.

Driver: 09 Launcher 10.5
4 Wood: 09 Launcher Steel 17
Hybrid: Baffler DWS 20 Aldila Reg
Irons: AP1 4-GW Steel
Wedges: 588 Gunmetal 56 & 60Putter: Studio Style Newport 2Ball: NXT Tour


  • 7 years later...
Posted
Thought I would bump this thread to ask why we still don't have more matchplay competitions, especially for the top, say 16-32 players? Personally, I love watching the one v one battles ala Ryder Cup and believe more top level matchplay would break up the monotony of the stroke play schedule Everyone loves an underdog so I can't see what the problem would be if the top 10 players were not contesting a final.
  • Upvote 1

Matt

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thought I would bump this thread to ask why we still don't have more matchplay competitions, especially for the top, say 16-32 players? Personally, I love watching the one v one battles ala Ryder Cup and believe more top level matchplay would break up the monotony of the stroke play schedule Everyone loves an underdog so I can't see what the problem would be if the top 10 players were not contesting a final.

I think match play on Tour is interesting, and I always thought it was a good fit in February / March because of the connection to March Madness. A problem with doing it bracket-style is that it doesn't make for great TV at the end when it's for all the marbles. I mean, it can, like with Day / Dubuisson. But having two guys playing for the most part alone (they address this with a consolation bracket match the same time), there's a lot of dead air and watching dudes walking for 5 hours. You don't have the "let's cut to 16" or whatever you have with a full field and you're only stuck with the dead air when the tension is highest with the last groups or a playoff. Ryder Cup has a ton of matches going simultaneously.

I think match play is awesome, but it has to be in small doses or the right setup.

  • Upvote 1

Dom's Sticks:

Callaway X-24 10.5° Driver, Callaway Big Bertha 15° wood, Callaway XR 19° hybrid, Callaway X-24 24° hybrid, Callaway X-24 5i-9i, PING Glide PW 47°/12°, Cleveland REG 588 52°/08°, Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 56°/13°, 60°/10°, Odyssey Versa Jailbird putter w/SuperStroke Slim 3.0 grip, Callaway Chev Stand Bag, Titleist Pro-V1x ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I think match play is awesome, but it has to be in small doses or the right setup.

I agree, the right setup is essential, both for the TV companies and also the viewers.  I think it would need to be played over 3-4 days and have the semi's and final on the last day but as you said, there would be still be a lot of dead air.  Maybe it's a wish of diehard fans and not the masses?  I really hope that someone far more imaginative than me and who has an influence on how Golf is run, can come up with a way to get more match play on our screens.

Matt

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Two factors:

1) The PGA tour and golf season is too long and too important to treat minimally in the Fed Ex Cup format.

2) Individual golf events are too random and too short to overweight for a season long award.

In conclusion:

It was a great idea, but the Fed Ex Cup is unworkable as a satisfactory athletic competition.  It stinks.

"Witty golf quote."


Posted

As a caveat, I will say that many of the match play suggestions in this thread are the best solutions I've heard yet.  But TV won't let it happen.

"Witty golf quote."


Posted

I'd have thought that FedEx would have something to say about it. 4 weeks intense coverage becomes...........a few days. Not sure the Marketing Director would like the idea.


Note: This thread is 3916 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.