Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4132 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello Friends.  New guy here looking for some help.  I a 10 hc shooting in the low 80's and want to bring my game into the 70's.

I have always taken a shallow divit [I'm more of a sweeper] but decided more compression at impact would help my game.  I have pretty well gotten it down except I can decide at what point in the swing you begin t cup the left wrist.

Perhaps some of you could give me some help in this area.

Thanks much for your help and best wishes.


Posted
You have come to the right place! I suggest posting a my swing thread and others will be able to give you advice accordingly! It is just tough to know how to help you otherwise, good luck!

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Hello Friends.  New guy here looking for some help.  I a 10 hc shooting in the low 80's and want to bring my game into the 70's.

I have always taken a shallow divit [I'm more of a sweeper] but decided more compression at impact would help my game.  I have pretty well gotten it down except I can decide at what point in the swing you begin t cup the left wrist.

Perhaps some of you could give me some help in this area.

Thanks much for your help and best wishes.

Cupping the wrist isn't something you need to think about. If you're a 10 handicap and a sweeper there is a very good chance your wrist already cups before impact. So if anything you want to work on pieces that'll help you achieve more of an inline impact condition (shaft lining up with the lead arm at impact). We call it Key #3

Don't most people keep their wrist flat these days? I know I always have

Not most ;-)

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thanks to all of you for your replies.  I will reply as best I can.

1.  No, there are a lot of golfers who have different wrist position at top of swing.  I am more specifically speaking of a cupped wrist at impact which allows more of a divot.  As I have been more of a sweeper of the ball, my wrist has had little cupping at impact.

2.  It will be a while before I can post a video of my swing as I have never done it and have no way yet of doing that.  I am looking into it.

3.  Thanks you for the photos, that is almost exactly the position I am attempting to reach at the bottom of my swing.  Until now, I have never thought about my wrist position at impact until seeing a video and trying it.  I am much encouraged by the result which allows a much more penetrating ball flight.

As I am very new to that process, I thought you folks might have some suggestions on how/when to cup the wrist in the downswing process.  I will be looking into your 5 swings process.

Thanks again for your help.


  • Moderator
Posted
I am more specifically speaking of a cupped wrist at impact which allows more of a divot.  As I have been more of a sweeper of the ball, my wrist has had little cupping at impact.

You might be mixed up on what cupping means when it comes to the left wrist. Cupping is dorsiflexion of the left wrist. Bowing or palmar flexing is the opposite, that would lead to more of a divot.

This is cupping or dorsiflexion

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

mvmac:  Thanks for the photo.  Apparently I was using the wrong terminology.  I will use the word bowing as it is easier to work with.  Yes, that is the subject of my question.  Perhaps I will learn more about proper terminology if I can stay at it long enough.

I assume the wrist is bowed on the downswing prior to impact.  Any suggestions as to when/how that might happen or is it just subject to the individual swing?

I am very pleased at the result of learning this move.

Thanks to all of you for your replies.  I will reply as best I can.

1.  No, there are a lot of golfers who have different wrist position at top of swing.  I am more specifically speaking of a cupped wrist at impact which allows more of a divot.  As I have been more of a sweeper of the ball, my wrist has had little cupping at impact.

2.  It will be a while before I can post a video of my swing as I have never done it and have no way yet of doing that.  I am looking into it.

3.  Thanks you for the photos, that is almost exactly the position I am attempting to reach at the bottom of my swing.  Until now, I have never thought about my wrist position at impact until seeing a video and trying it.  I am much encouraged by the result which allows a much more penetrating ball flight.

As I am very new to that process, I thought you folks might have some suggestions on how/when to cup the wrist in the downswing process.

Thanks again for your help.


  • Moderator
Posted

I assume the wrist is bowed on the downswing prior to impact.  Any suggestions as to when/how that might happen or is it just subject to the individual swing?

We like to say "lag happens", so a flat or bowed wrist is a result of good things happening before it. What you need to work on to improve your impact alignments depends on a few things. Can't really give you an answer without seeing your swing.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Thanks Mike, I will work on a video but it's going to be a while.

I'm not at all unhappy with my swing, ball contact hits the sweet spot and the ball goes where I want even better now as I work on that impact position. Pinching the ball really adds more for my ball flight.   I just thought there might be some opinions on when to  begin bowing that wrist as you reach impact.

Best wishes to you and thanks for your help.


Note: This thread is 4132 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.