Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4283 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Two workplace shootings in one week. Both seem to have been committed by terminated employees. Both were about ten miles from where I work. As a supervisor that has to terminate employees when necessary myself, I'm glad I live in a state that allows me to carry and protect myself. Believe it or not, there ARE bad people out there.

Derrek

Righty in the left trap


Posted

Two workplace shootings in one week. Both seem to have been committed by terminated employees. Both were about ten miles from where I work. As a supervisor that has to terminate employees when necessary myself, I'm glad I live in a state that allows me to carry and protect myself. Believe it or not, there ARE bad people out there.

I was pretty lucky that during the 18 years I was a supervisor I didn't have to fire anybody. There were times I had to figure out a way to motivate people to do better but always figured out something that would work.

There was one employee that blamed me for getting fired by the General Manager but I had nothing to do with the firing. I would have handled the situation short of firing the guy but my boss was more hardnosed about it when he got word of it.

That employee told people for quite a few years that when he saw me he was going to whip my ass. When those people would tell me that I would just shake my head and say he knows where I am.

In regards to carrying: I'm not sure how safe that makes any of us if somebody truly wants to shoot us. If some nut-case wants to sit across a parking lot and shoot us having a gun is not going to stop it.


Posted

I was pretty lucky that during the 18 years I was a supervisor I didn't have to fire anybody. There were times I had to figure out a way to motivate people to do better but always figured out something that would work.

There was one employee that blamed me for getting fired by the General Manager but I had nothing to do with the firing. I would have handled the situation short of firing the guy but my boss was more hardnosed about it when he got word of it.

That employee told people for quite a few years that when he saw me he was going to whip my ass. When those people would tell me that I would just shake my head and say he knows where I am.

In regards to carrying: I'm not sure how safe that makes any of us if somebody truly wants to shoot us. If some nut-case wants to sit across a parking lot and shoot us having a gun is not going to stop it.

I have not been as lucky, I have had to fire numerous workers in the 6 years I have been a supervisor. And you are right, if someone really wants to get at you they can. But I will at least have a chance to protect myself....................... A better one than if I was unarmed.

I may go down, but I will go down returning fire.

Derrek

Righty in the left trap


Posted

Two workplace shootings in one week. Both seem to have been committed by terminated employees. Both were about ten miles from where I work. As a supervisor that has to terminate employees when necessary myself, I'm glad I live in a state that allows me to carry and protect myself. Believe it or not, there ARE bad people out there.

If I were you, I'd wish I lived in a state where those lunatics weren't allowed to carry to "protect themselves."

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If I were you, I'd wish I lived in a state where those lunatics weren't allowed to carry to "protect themselves."

What states don't allow a concealed weapons permit?

Brian   

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If I were you, I'd wish I lived in a state where those lunatics weren't allowed to carry to "protect themselves."

If I'm not mistaken, Thanks to the bill of rights, you can carry in every state, just not concealed.  Glad your not me.

Derrek

Righty in the left trap


Posted

Where I live, Maryland, and where I work, DC, you need a permit and can only get one upon a showing of good cause.  In DC, that's the new law passed because the flat out ban was struck down.

I actually support the right to bear arms, but for completely different reasons.  I just think these "protect myself" from the lunatic arguments are bunk.  If a guy walked into your office to kill you, you likely would never have a chance.  Maybe in the context of a mass shooting, but I don't think we've ever seen a private carrying citizen stop one of those, either.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If I'm not mistaken, Thanks to the bill of rights, you can carry in every state, just not concealed.  Glad your not me.

In Maryland, it depends on the gun.  You can't carry a handgun without a permit, concealed or not, unless you have a permit.  And the permits, like I said, are basically impossible to get.  You could carry a rifle, I suppose.

DC's long standing ban on open/concealed carry was struck down this summer.  I'm pretty sure the city council just passed a law last week that is the same as MD, requiring "good cause" to get a permit.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Illinois

Surprisingly, no longer. Every state now allows for some form of concealed carry. The vast majority, something like 42 off the top of my head, are "shall issue" states, meaning the state must issue a permit to anyone who meets the basic eligibility requirements. The remaining handful are "may issue", where you may or may not be issued a permit depending on the somewhat subjective determination of perceived need....

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Where I live, Maryland, and where I work, DC, you need a permit and can only get one upon a showing of good cause.  In DC, that's the new law passed because the flat out ban was struck down.

I actually support the right to bear arms, but for completely different reasons.  I just think these "protect myself" from the lunatic arguments are bunk.  If a guy walked into your office to kill you, you likely would never have a chance.  Maybe in the context of a mass shooting, but I don't think we've ever seen a private carrying citizen stop one of those, either.

Not to sound harsh, but I think your argument is bunk. One thing for sure, if no private citizen IS carrying, you will never see one of these stopped. If someone walks into my office with a gun, the only way I have NO chance is if I am unarmed. Protection is the #1 reason for carrying. Like I said, if someone chooses to stick their head in the sand and not admit there are bad people in this world, that is your choice. I choose differently.

  • Upvote 1

Derrek

Righty in the left trap


Posted

Yay!!!  Another 2nd amendment debate.  Certainly this one is going to be productive and civil and somebody is going to change somebody else's mind.  I just know it!!

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Yay!!!  Another 2nd amendment debate.  Certainly this one is going to be productive and civil and somebody is going to change somebody else's mind.  I just know it!!

Or we could just start checking with you for approval for thread subjects. You can support the right to do drugs, I'll support the right to carry.

Derrek

Righty in the left trap


Posted
[QUOTE name="Golfingdad" url="/t/77361/shootings-in-alabama#post_1059249"]   Yay!!!  Another 2nd amendment debate.  Certainly this one is going to be productive and civil and somebody is going to change somebody else's mind.  I just know it!! [/QUOTE] I am just waiting patiently for my buddy to show up. I am excited for the incite.
  • Upvote 1

Nate

:tmade:(10.5) :pxg:(4W & 7W) MIURA(3-PW) :mizuno:(50/54/60) 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Not to sound harsh, but I think your argument is bunk. One thing for sure, if no private citizen IS carrying, you will never see one of these stopped. If someone walks into my office with a gun, the only way I have NO chance is if I am unarmed. Protection is the #1 reason for carrying. Like I said, if someone chooses to stick their head in the sand and not admit there are bad people in this world, that is your choice. I choose differently.

I agree.  Because nobody would have a gun, including the lunatic.  Nothing to stop. :-P

I'm the tin foil hat wearing weirdo who thinks that we need guns to protect us from the government, not the crazy guy next door.  If we restrict guns, the crazy guy doesn't have them either.  But the government still does.  So it really only gives you a comparative disadvantage vis a vis the government, while likely protecting you from the crazy person.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Yay!!!  Another 2nd amendment debate.  Certainly this one is going to be productive and civil and somebody is going to change somebody else's mind.  I just know it!!

Interestingly, given the rather dramatic national change in carry rights over the past few years, it appears that minds are changing. Certainly not all, but a lot, even in states where you might not have anticipated such a dramatic movement. Baby steps..... :-)

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I agree.  Because nobody would have a gun, including the lunatic.  Nothing to stop.

I'm the tin foil hat wearing weirdo who thinks that we need guns to protect us from the government, not the crazy guy next door.  If we restrict guns, the crazy guy doesn't have them either.  But the government still does.  So it really only gives you a comparative disadvantage vis a vis the government, while likely protecting you from the crazy person.

If guns were made illegal today you think no one would have a gun ? Criminals don't obey laws. It would only take guns away from honest people.

I see your tin foil hat and raise you my bullet proof vest. ;-)

Derrek

Righty in the left trap


Posted

I am just waiting patiently for my buddy to show up. I am excited for the incite.

LOL, that is clever!!!

Or we could just start checking with you for approval for thread subjects. You can support the right to do drugs, I'll support the right to carry.

Why so defensive??  What makes you automatically assume that since I think it's silly to argue this topic again that I am on the opposite side of it?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4283 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have been debating getting a launch monitor of some sort, if only so I can re-figure my shot zones (I haven't actually mapped them in years) and also to practice distance wedges at home.  I have to see if this works with either my current setup, or what my setup would be if I move it to the garage.  
    • Day 48, June 23.  After work today, I took 25 minutes in my practice room;  6-iron, same everything as yesterday except the time and count. 
    • Well, this is interesting.  I think we discovered a few months ago that I haven't been following professional golf in a while (my confusion about Scotty's footwork confirmed that), so at least as I aim to follow a bit more I'll get something new to learn with all of you.  My very quick read of Erik's summary makes me think this new Challenger series fits somewhere between Korn Ferry and the Championship (not Champions, but I know I'm going to make that mistake a few times if I'm not careful!).   My recollection is that there were already second-tier events among the PGA Tour;  the Bob Hope didn't have the same quality of field as the event at Riviera (whose current name I forget, although now that I say that, I realize the Palm Springs event hasn't been called the Bob Hope in a few years either).   With the absence of the FedEx (if I'm reading that correctly), does that mean no more FedEx Cup at all? Hopefully I'll have time later in 2026 to sit down and see what we're in for in 2027, where one of my goals already is to follow more professional golf.
    • The highlights as I see them: Championship and Challenger Series The creation of the PGA Tour and the PGB Tour, in the words of Joel Dahmen a few years ago. They're calling them the Championship Series (23-24 events) and the Challenger Series (20+ events). Both run February to August. They feel this will achieve three things: increasing the consistency and quality of fields across the season creating a clear system for players to earn and retain status and delivering a more structured and competitive experience for fans and partners—all in an effort to strengthen meritocracy. Championship Series Structure and Eligibility The 23-24 events includes the Players, majors, season-ending events, and the Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup. These will be 72-hole events with a 36-hole cut to the top 65 and ties and purses of $20M+. 120 players without an alternate list. 90 players (roughly) from the previous year and 20 players promoted from the Challenger Series. Full eligibility will be finalized later this year. Sites (cities) to be finalized soon, but 10 of the 15 courses have already been determined. Postseason: includes retention and relegation and concludes with match play. The Tour Championship will also be played across a rotation of prestigious courses. Challenger Series Structure and Eligibility 20+ events. Running concurrently. Will feature players fighting their way back to the Championship Series or players graduating and on the upswing from the Korn Ferry Tour. Many of these events will be current PGA Tour courses. About 7 of the Challenger Series events will be during off weeks for the Championship Series with elevated purses and visibility. Purses of at least $4M, with cuts similar to the Champ series. 144 player fields. Competitive Fields for Both Series Players will be eligible for only one series at a time: Championship Series Players are not eligible for Challenger Series events. Championship Series members will have a known schedule with all events having the same eligibility. Players and Majors will have their own eligibility criteria. Championship Series players don't have to play all events. This begs the question about, say, the Canadian Open, and other "home-town" events that players might want to play, even if they're Challenger Series events. Will releases be granted? Promotion and Relegation At least 90 players will be retained in the Championship Series, and 20 players will be promoted from the Challenger Series each year. Battlefield promotion for two-time winners from the Challenger Series. Players relegated from the Championship Series will have a "last chance" opportunity to retain status, or will go to the Challenger Series. Criteria will be finalized before the start of the 2027 season. Points System New points system (not FedExCup points). Separate points systems for the Championship and Challenger Series. Elevated points in the Challenger Series for off-weeks on the Championship Series. More details tk. Elevated International Events in the Fall The fall schedule will include a limited series of elevated international events with top players from the Championship Series, with the intent to deliver in partnership with the DP World Tour as part of the Strategic Alliance. Last Chance Series The Tour will develop a “last chance” series of 4-6 events in the fall, with a limited number of spots on the Championship Series available for top finishers. Eligibility will include players relegated from the Championship Series, Challenger Series players, and other categories to be determined. Q-School continues, as do the Korn Ferry Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamerica. Also, Brian Rolapp is the new commissioner as of January 1, 2027.
    • You can download the PDF at this link or see the first page of it above.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.