Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Golfweek: LPGA - Family, Money, Leaving Golf, Life Choices


Note: This thread is 4007 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

http://golfweek.com/news/2014/dec/17/lpga-pros-hard-choice-when-walk-away/

Knowing when to walk away is a complex decision that can jell in an instant or drag on for years. LPGA players generally avoid the “R” word.

“Nobody retired from golf,” said Jane Geddes, a major champion who works in talent relations for World Wrestling Entertainment. “People just faded away.”

When Lorena Ochoa told Betsy King that she wanted to play on the LPGA for 10 years and then stop to have a family, King warned her that leaving wouldn’t be easy.

“No, no, I’m Mexican,” Ochoa said. “For Latins, it’s very important to stay home.”

Ochoa married in 2009 and abruptly quit the tour the next spring at age 28 after seven seasons, 27 victories and nearly $15 million in earnings.

Stacy Lewis thinks Ochoa’s example will be more model than one-off in the coming years.

“I know there are a lot of girls who can’t even imagine having kids out there and playing,” Lewis said.

Among the current players on tour, LPGA research shows only eight have competed for at least 20 years. Of the 30 players who earned exempt status at the 2004 LPGA Q-School, only medalist Paula Creamer and three others still compete on tour. Compare that with the 35 who earned PGA Tour cards through Q-School that year: 14 are still on Tour.

Players compete for more money than ever before, but the fact remains that most women who earn tour cards go on to pursue second careers.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

The LPGA also has a higher churn rate. They're simply not as good. Just because you make it through Q-School, doesn't mean you're likely to make it.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Money has to play a big role in all of this. I would imagine the LPGA players who are struggling just to make cuts every week can barely scrape together a living. That article says the 122nd ranked player on the money list only took home $23k. For comparison, the 122nd ranked player on the PGA money list took home just over $800k. I would imagine this wouldn't happen to the same extent if the 122nd LPGA player was even making half of what the 122nd ranked PGA player was making.

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Money has to play a big role in all of this. I would imagine the LPGA players who are struggling just to make cuts every week can barely scrape together a living. That article says the 122nd ranked player on the money list only took home $23k. For comparison, the 122nd ranked player on the PGA money list took home just over $800k. I would imagine this wouldn't happen to the same extent if the 122nd LPGA player was even making half of what the 122nd ranked PGA player was making.

I think this has a lot to do with why there are many LPGA players known more for their modeling than their playing. If it paid more, I bet they would focus more on their golf.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4007 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.