Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3920 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

My local course has recently undergone some re-designs as well as switching the nines. This got me thinking about how the changes would affect the GPS devices being used for the course and how and if the major brands would update their GPS data. I asked at the pro shop who advised me that major brands of GPS devices could be re-mapped by the user. Of course, that's not quite what I wanted to hear ... for one thing, if I use my GPS at a course I've never played before, I normally wouldn't know of any re-designs and would simply rely on the information provided by my device.

So, does anybody know how the major brands revise or update their GPS data? Do they rely on users or the golf course,


  • Administrator
Posted

I imagine that even if the hole number was wrong, the GPS would know which hole you were on. It wouldn't assume you were on the third hole (a par three) when you're really playing the twelfth (a par five) for example.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I imagine that even if the hole number was wrong, the GPS would know which hole you were on. It wouldn't assume you were on the third hole (a par three) when you're really playing the twelfth (a par five) for example.

This would be my line of thinking as well. I would guess you'll still get the correct mapping/yardages but the hole number would be wrong.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My local course in New Braunfels Texas was reopened last October after  13 month renovation.  The renovation included several holes changing number (old 9 became new 18) and all holes had physical design changes to the fairways and greens. It took about three months after reopening before Sky Caddie was updated with new information. The club pro or staff must contact the device company (e.g. Sky Caddie) for them to schedule their staff to remap the course.

In the interim, you can use the existing software mapping for holes if the greens did not change location. If tees changed, then you will get the correct distance. As was mentioned above, if the hole number changed, then you use the old number hole info, on the new hole. For example, I could use old number 9 info while playing the new 18th hole. Obviously, the physical changes did not show up on the device, so I made some  notes for the holes. I used the new sprinkler head yardages against what the sky caddie showed for that location to compare old to new.

Hope this helps.


Posted

Yes, that does help and thanks. Now I know the process for Sky Caddie.

Since I wrote the original post, I've contacted Bushnell (I use their hybrid rangefinder). They've informed me that either the golf course or a member can contact them, then they will send out a form detailing any changes. They say that they will have the changes available within three business days of receiving the completed form.

What remains unclear (at least for Bushnell) is that I'm still unclear as to how they receive the GPS data since there's no place on the form for GPS coordinates. I've replied to them asking that particular question.

For clarification, I know that most GPS rangefinders can be modified by the user (if the user is aware of the changes) but I'm more interested to know of the general process for changes for the major manufacturers. I'm surprised (and impressed) to know that Sky Caddie would do the actual mapping rather than rely on a user to submit data. This seems to give their data some credibility. And under these circumstances, I feel that taking 6 months to post changes is reasonable.


Posted
I had an issue with a course in the Poconos last year while using the Golf Logix app. They reconfigured three holes and it hadn't been updated when I played it. After the 6th or 7th hole, all the tee boxes and greens were off kilter. I contacted them the next day through email. In a couple of exchanges with captures of Google Earth showing the old and new positions of tees and greens, it was fixed and roughly updated within a week. A full course update would happen a bit later. Next time around (a few moths later), all seemed good.

Note: This thread is 3920 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.