Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3917 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

If i have the ball position (at address) in the middle of my stance, for mid and short irons, would that cause poor contact such as fat/thin etc ?

I was reading about placing the ball more forward in my stance, to get the club to the bottom of my swing arc.

Driver: Callaway ft5
Fairway Wood: Willson Ultra
Hybrid: Willson Ultra 4h
Irons: Nike Vrs X
Wedges: Nike Vrs X
Sand Wedge: Willson Harmonized 56
Putter: Top Flite Mallet
Balls: Titliest pro v 1, Nike Mojo, Callaway, Willson
Bag: Sun Mountain 7 dividers.  


Posted

No, you hit fat and thin shots from not getting your weight foward at impact and or your head is to far behind the ball.

5 Simple Keys® Associate

"Golf is not a game of great shots. It's a game of the most accurate misses.

The people who win make the smallest mistakes." - Gene Littler

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
If i have the ball position (at address) in the middle of my stance, for mid and short irons, would that cause poor contact such as fat/thin etc ? I was reading about placing the ball more forward in my stance, to get the club to the bottom of my swing arc.

When you swing without a ball down, and take a divot of some sort, the ball will be best hit at the flat untouched earth just before the divot starts. In every case save a sand trap that I can think of, the ball is to be struck first. The mid and short and wedge irons can often be played to the rear by an amazing amount, but whether you are comfortable or able to hit it there is dependant on your swing of course.

Tom R.

TM R1 on a USTv2, TM 3wHL on USTv2, TM Rescue 11 in 17,TM udi #3, Rocketbladez tour kbs reg, Mack Daddy 50.10,54.14,60.14, Cleveland putter


Posted
I found that in order to avoid these top or thin shots, I place something behind the ball, maybe an inch behind. Then I find I would hit downward, without hitting that object And more toward the ball. does that drill makes sense to anyone?

Driver: Callaway ft5
Fairway Wood: Willson Ultra
Hybrid: Willson Ultra 4h
Irons: Nike Vrs X
Wedges: Nike Vrs X
Sand Wedge: Willson Harmonized 56
Putter: Top Flite Mallet
Balls: Titliest pro v 1, Nike Mojo, Callaway, Willson
Bag: Sun Mountain 7 dividers.  


  • Moderator
Posted
I found that in order to avoid these top or thin shots, I place something behind the ball, maybe an inch behind. Then I find I would hit downward, without hitting that object And more toward the ball. does that drill makes sense to anyone?

Two-ball drill should be done with a ball or object a little bit farther away than that. By placing the object so close to the ball, I think you're training yourself to hit down pretty steeply and aggressively, and you'll end up with other swing issues.

Here is @iacas doing the two-ball drill. Notice the second ball is back and in slightly on an arc:

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3917 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.