Jump to content
IGNORED

Back Surgery!


LTHardy
Note: This thread is 3305 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Inversions are an important part of the yoga world. Inversions range from mild to more difficult.  All inversions imply that the heart is above the head, unlike normal  where the head is above the heart.  For most adults,  inversions also may tax the respiratory functions as the chest can be compressed or the airways flexed in unusual ways but these become minimized with time and technique.  You will need to learn and employ correct breathing to sustain good inversions.  All of us breathe, but not all of us do so correctly.

I can tell you that standing on your head for some time, let's start with one minute but one hour not rare,  with certainly strengthen your abdomen and back as your body is totally unprepared to keep your heavy legs in that position.  Advise you to seek a yoga instructor for best headstand  technique as the cervical spine can be damaged through improper practice.  Don't get hurt.   Neither the internet, or me, is  responsible for self induced paralysis.

I cannot recommend any inversion table coz, IMO, they lead to a dependency, are costly, bring minimum benefit, take up space in the house, have no resale value, and mostly deprive YOU of the deep satisfaction of accomplishment which a good inversion will bring. However, the table may bring you some relief, and that's good so give it a try.  I've used the foam roller and it can offer benefit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Full depth back squats + deadlifts.  Sit ups, cruches, and all other manner of "core" exercises are no comparison to these exercises when it comes to developing core strength and stability.  No contest.  After chronic back pain originating from bulging discs at L4 and L5 suffered from rowing in college in 1986, I did not have a pain free day until 2010.  As a result, in 2006 I sold my club membership and stopped playing golf.  In 2009 I started back squatting and deadlifting, with a linear progression, gradually increasing weight each session.  It was a rough first year, but within 18 month, I was a completely different person.   I started squatting with 95# (the bar plus 25# weights) and added 10# per session with squats. I can play all I want now, no pain whatsoever, to the extent that I just joined another club.  I try to scream this from the roof tops, but either folks don't want to believe me, or are afraid of hard work. If you low bar back squat to full depth, by the way, you get an excellent dynamic hamstring stretch with every rep.  No need for further stretching. If you go past parallel, you also shift the load from the quads to the hamstrings, taking strain off the knee, while developing musculature to protect the knee.  If you stop at or above parallel, you create shearing forces on the knee.  Anyone who tells you to squat at or above parallel is foolish.  Good luck. Just make sure to find someone to coach you on these lifts who knows what the heck he/she is talking about.  The average globo gym trainer is clueless and will try to get you squatting with a ***** pad on a smith machine. Run.

An interesting, and VERY dangerous suggestion for someone with lumbar radiculopathy. I'm curious.....exactly what are your qualifications? MD? PT? Or is this just a...it worked for me so you need to do this???

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Inversions are an important part of the yoga world. Inversions range from mild to more difficult.  All inversions imply that the heart is above the head, unlike normal  where the head is above the heart.  For most adults,  inversions also may tax the respiratory functions as the chest can be compressed or the airways flexed in unusual ways but these become minimized with time and technique.  You will need to learn and employ correct breathing to sustain good inversions.  All of us breathe, but not all of us do so correctly.

I can tell you that standing on your head for some time, let's start with one minute but one hour not rare,  with certainly strengthen your abdomen and back as your body is totally unprepared to keep your heavy legs in that position.  Advise you to seek a yoga instructor for best headstand  technique as the cervical spine can be damaged through improper practice.  Don't get hurt.   Neither the internet, or me, is  responsible for self induced paralysis.

I cannot recommend any inversion table coz, IMO, they lead to a dependency, are costly, bring minimum benefit, take up space in the house, have no resale value, and mostly deprive YOU of the deep satisfaction of accomplishment which a good inversion will bring. However, the table may bring you some relief, and that's good so give it a try.  I've used the foam roller and it can offer benefit.

The inversion table came yesterday, its quite good because you can choose what angle you want to be at, you dont have to be 180 degrees, ive started off doing just around 120 degrees or so just to work my way into a routine. I understand your point however, that a natural handstand with proper technique would be more beneficial than using a machine, but i think i will stick with this for the time being as i imagine getting into the position of a handstand might be quite a challenge and i dont want to make my discs any worse. You mention proper breathing, what is the correct procedure for correct breathing? I have read that with inversion therapy, if you are not completely relaxed then it can be detrimental because having a tense core can cause compression instead of decompression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


An interesting, and VERY dangerous suggestion for someone with lumbar radiculopathy. I'm curious.....exactly what are your qualifications? MD? PT? Or is this just a...it worked for me so you need to do this???


Fair question.  No "formal qualifications".  And squatting could be dangerous for someone with stenosis.  Yes, it did work for me.  Beyond that, I've studied the topic extensively as I had a great deal of skepticism before undertaking such a regime.

I can throw hundreds of links up, but I like this one a lot:  http://startingstrength.com/index.php/site/article/barbell_training_is_big_medicine#.VTeiXWbtNek

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Fair question.  No "formal qualifications".  And squatting could be dangerous for someone with stenosis.  Yes, it did work for me.  Beyond that, I've studied the topic extensively as I had a great deal of skepticism before undertaking such a regime.  I can throw hundreds of links up, but I like this one a lot:  [URL=http://startingstrength.com/index.php/site/article/barbell_training_is_big_medicine#.VTeiXWbtNek]http://startingstrength.com/index.php/site/article/barbell_training_is_big_medicine#.VTeiXWbtNek[/URL]

Decent read, lots of medical references, and all good information. Only thing is, he (and you) are suggesting barbell training for people with lumbar pain. NONE of his references specifically cite BARBELL training, and they certainly don't support loaded full squats, they cite resistance exercise. Barbell training, specifically putting a bar on your back(across you shoulders or chest) GREATLY increases both compressive and shear forces in your lumbar spine, and is VERY dangerous for someone with lumbar pathology. Now, as a "wise" man told me today, hopefully no one is actually implementing medical/rehab advice that they found on a golf forum. I truly hope that anyone experiencing back pain consults with their MD before starting an exercise program, and then they seek out professional therapy from a licensed Physical Therapist who will help them regain mobility and , most importantly, STABILITY in the area, and only then begin to strengthen. And now I think we may be officially "off topic". :~(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Decent read, lots of medical references, and all good information. Only thing is, he (and you) are suggesting barbell training for people with lumbar pain. NONE of his references specifically cite BARBELL training, and they certainly don't support loaded full squats, they cite resistance exercise. Barbell training, specifically putting a bar on your back(across you shoulders or chest) GREATLY increases both compressive and shear forces in your lumbar spine, and is VERY dangerous for someone with lumbar pathology.

Now, as a "wise" man told me today, hopefully no one is actually implementing medical/rehab advice that they found on a golf forum. I truly hope that anyone experiencing back pain consults with their MD before starting an exercise program, and then they seek out professional therapy from a licensed Physical Therapist who will help them regain mobility and , most importantly, STABILITY in the area, and only then begin to strengthen.

And now I think we may be officially "off topic".


You are ignoring the author's experience.  He is a MD that would be consulted, presumably, for a back injury.  And he would suggest exactly the program I outline for most patients.   He is a MD doc who has studied and written extensively on the benefits of barbell training and actually trains his own patients (having, himself, thoroughly researched and received detailed training in barbell training).  Many of his patients/training clients are are elderly and infirm.  He recommends barbell training for them and reports uniformly positive results.  The compressive and shear forces you cite are minimized by a program of progressive overload.  As I mentioned above, I said to start very, very light and progress slowly -- doing so helps you regain the mobility and "STABILITY" in the area and strengthens gradually.

And, if you use proper form -- which is easily taught -- there are no shear forces in your lumbar spine.  You stabilize with your lumbar musculature.  As for compressive force, sure, but, again you are bracing with the entire abdomonen, creating strength and stability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3305 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • https://static1.squarespace.com/static/603d222df4a6a57df7ef3e29/t/663cdba5d89e3a1848dab8d1/1715264422455/US_DIS_ILND_1_24cv3749_d34676497e293_COMPLAINT_filed_by_SuperSpeed_Golf_LLC_Jury_Demand.pdf The full complaint is there, but  basically, SuperSpeed (SS*) is claiming the Stack System (SS*) Stack System’s [sic] produces inflated metrics later used to, [sic] mislead and deceive consumers. Stack System’s marketing materials inflate apparent swing speed and distance gains through selective presentment of data without qualification that purported gains are not the result, in whole or part, of its training protocol and products. * Yes, I'm joking about abbreviating both "SS." SuperSpeed wants: A judgment that the Stack System has disseminated false and/or misleading information in violation of federal and Illinois law. The deletion of all false advertising distributed and recall of all packaging containing false advertising and a requirement that Stack System issue notices (written or otherwise) to that effect to all current distributors and retailers of its products and all distributors with whom Stack System has done business in the past eighteen months. Written confirmation within 30 days of an injunction detailing the manner and form in which Stack System has complied. An order that Stack System disseminate corrective advertising informing consumers, the trade, and the public of Stack System’s unlawful conduct. 3X all profits received by Stack System as a result of its unlawful actions. 3X all damages sustained by SuperSpeed (as a result of Stack System’s actions) The cost of the action All reasonable attorney fees All other relief to which SuperSpeed are entitled and such other or additional relief as just and proper. Oy.
    • I'm not doing this for the hundred and twentieth time. Sorry in advance, but you get the massively abridged version. Those guys also benefited from the weaker/shallower fields. Also, Watson's career doesn't overlap with Jack's like many think it did. Tom is nearly a decade younger. Jack won only like four majors only after Tom won his first. And Tom won more British Opens than he did all three of the other majors combined, as it was his specialty (not Jack's). Arnie's career similarly doesn't overlap Jack's as much as many think.   Jack would also tell you Tiger was the better golfer.
    • Weaker depth of fields for sure. Some of the top level guys with Jack were pretty awesome. Tom Watson had the lead on the 72nd hole of the 2009 British Open, an event where Tiger missed the cut. Old Tom was almost 60 years old. Jack himself at age 58 finished Top 10 at The 1998 Masters and scored better than Tiger, who won The Masters by 12 shots just a year before that.   The success of both Tom & Jack in older age gives some hope that maybe Tiger can find the magic again at some point. He’s still trying to figure out how to build the stamina for 72 holes after the leg injury. I would love to see him jump on the leaderboard in the coming years. I know a lot of people have given up on him at this point, but that was also true from 2014 to 2017 with the back injuries. He had a hell of a resurgence in 2018 & 2019. Would be fun to see it again. 
    • Perceptive rules question by caddie unlocks Tour pro’s ‘dead zone’ relief A perceptive rules question by Xander Schauffele’s caddie, Austin Kaiser, unlocked “dead zone” relief during the Wells Fargo Championship.
    • I ran across an interesting new clip, Johnson Wagner went into that spot with the Referee who allowed the relief.  Apparently there was a perfectly reasonable shot to be made, as Johnson clearly demonstrated, so relief from the TIO was perfectly appropriate.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...