Jump to content
IGNORED

Hybrids and driver for high handicapper


Note: This thread is 3306 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I'm fairly new to golf and have a pretty high handicap. I have heard that hybrids are a good idea for us lesser skilled golfers. I hit my long irons alright in comparison to my short irons, but there is little difference between 3, 4, and 5 in terms of average distance. Also it can be a bit of a crapshoot for the each of them. For example I might hit my 3 iron 190 yards one time and 170 the next (yes I'm a pretty high and short hitter) . I'm not talking about obvious mishits. Both can feel pretty similar to me but with different results. I can take out my 5 iron on one hole for a 170 yard shot and hit it 10 yards off the back of the green, and on the next hole take out my 3 iron for a 190 yards shot and hit it 20 yards from the front with neither of them feeling like an obvious mishit to me. Are hybrids a good option for solving this problem or is it more likely my swing speed varying or something like that? In other words is this a common problem for high handicappers with long irons or is this my own special problem. Do hybrids in general give more consistent distances for high handicappers? Also are there "more forgiving" vs "more control" hybrids like there are with irons? Maybe those two questions are contradictory? I really don't know anything about this but am trying to eliminate clubs that are causing me strokes and find something new.

On the flip side my 3 iron off the tee is one of my favorite shots. I leave my driver and 3 wood at home because I can't hit either of them worth a darn. Ironically I have an ancient 7 wood given to me by my grandfather that is one of my best clubs of the ground. Go figure.

So TL;DR

1. Are hybrids better than long irons in general for high handicappers?

2. Are there hybrids/woods/drivers that are better for high handicappers or is it more you pay for what you get and the "better" hybrids and drivers are better across the board instead of some being good for scratch golfers and some being good for high handicappers?

I hope I have posted this in the correct forum. I am new here and the best I could tell, this was the place to ask this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm fairly new to golf and have a pretty high handicap. I have heard that hybrids are a good idea for us lesser skilled golfers. I hit my long irons alright in comparison to my short irons, but there is little difference between 3, 4, and 5 in terms of average distance. Also it can be a bit of a crapshoot for the each of them. For example I might hit my 3 iron 190 yards one time and 170 the next (yes I'm a pretty high and short hitter) . I'm not talking about obvious mishits. Both can feel pretty similar to me but with different results. I can take out my 5 iron on one hole for a 170 yard shot and hit it 10 yards off the back of the green, and on the next hole take out my 3 iron for a 190 yards shot and hit it 20 yards from the front with neither of them feeling like an obvious mishit to me. Are hybrids a good option for solving this problem or is it more likely my swing speed varying or something like that? In other words is this a common problem for high handicappers with long irons or is this my own special problem. Do hybrids in general give more consistent distances for high handicappers? Also are there "more forgiving" vs "more control" hybrids like there are with irons? Maybe those two questions are contradictory? I really don't know anything about this but am trying to eliminate clubs that are causing me strokes and find something new.

On the flip side my 3 iron off the tee is one of my favorite shots. I leave my driver and 3 wood at home because I can't hit either of them worth a darn. Ironically I have an ancient 7 wood given to me by my grandfather that is one of my best clubs of the ground. Go figure.

So TL;DR

1. Are hybrids better than long irons in general for high handicappers?

2. Are there hybrids/woods/drivers that are better for high handicappers or is it more you pay for what you get and the "better" hybrids and drivers are better across the board instead of some being good for scratch golfers and some being good for high handicappers?

I hope I have posted this in the correct forum. I am new here and the best I could tell, this was the place to ask this.

I wouldn't call results like that all right in terms of your long irons, haha. I think what you described is pretty normal for higher handicap players. If you're not making good strikes, the lack of loft makes it hard to get the ball up in the air and you get very erratic shots long and short.

You say you're a 32 HC, and (very generally; lots of caveats to this) the general rule of thumb is that most double digit handicappers really don't need any iron longer than a 5. One you're into the 4 and longer, it's tough to get the ball up in the air. Hybrids help to solve that problem because they by their design launch the ball up high and, with the hot faces, longer graphite shafts, etc, tend to allow for an easier swing at the ball to achieve the same distance. So you don't have to feel you need to kills the ball with the 4 hybrid to get it out there like you would with a 4 iron.

I'll give you two answers to your second question. The first is the better answers, but you'll hate it. The first answer is you need to go and try a bunch of different hybrids with different combinations of shaft and loft and just see what you hit better. Anything I say in the second part of my answer won't trump what you find through your own experience. But to give you something to look at, I'd say that Callaway is pretty much the leader in hybrids right now. You can probably get a deal on the X Hot hybrids (2013 models) that aren't a big difference from the X2 Hot or the current XR. Taylormade's Jetspeed hybrids (and woods and drivers) are going for nothing these days. They were a product line that was actually fine, but tanked commercially and there's a glut of them. Nike Covert hybrids are also cheap these days but good. There's plenty of others. As for the scratch vs. HC divide, you'll see some clubs marketed as Pro or Tour or TP that are generally designed for better players, but it depends on what you find you hit better. The club doesn't know who's hitting it. If you like an X2 Hot Pro hybrid, go for it. I play at Tour 3-wood and I love it. Has a sweet black face and is adjustable in loft and I prefer the shape of it. Wouldn't trade it for the regular model even if you gave me the trade for free. It's personal preference. Anyway, try some previous year's models and consider buying used. Taylormade and Callaway both have great Preowned websites.

As for your 7W, it makes sense. 7W has a lot of loft and it's easy to get up into the air off of the ground.

  • Upvote 1

Dom's Sticks:

Callaway X-24 10.5° Driver, Callaway Big Bertha 15° wood, Callaway XR 19° hybrid, Callaway X-24 24° hybrid, Callaway X-24 5i-9i, PING Glide PW 47°/12°, Cleveland REG 588 52°/08°, Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 56°/13°, 60°/10°, Odyssey Versa Jailbird putter w/SuperStroke Slim 3.0 grip, Callaway Chev Stand Bag, Titleist Pro-V1x ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

1. Are hybrids better than long irons in general for high handicappers?

2. Are there hybrids/woods/drivers that are better for high handicappers or is it more you pay for what you get and the "better" hybrids and drivers are better across the board instead of some being good for scratch golfers and some being good for high handicappers?

1. Yes, easier to get up in the air and better on off-center hits.

2. Yes there are clubs that are designed for moderate to higher handicappers. PING SF Tec driver, Callaway XR, TaylorMade AeroBurner.

  • Upvote 1

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I wouldn't call results like that all right in terms of your long irons, haha. I think what you described is pretty normal for higher handicap players. If you're not making good strikes, the lack of loft makes it hard to get the ball up in the air and you get very erratic shots long and short.

You say you're a 32 HC, and (very generally; lots of caveats to this) the general rule of thumb is that most double digit handicappers really don't need any iron longer than a 5. One you're into the 4 and longer, it's tough to get the ball up in the air. Hybrids help to solve that problem because they by their design launch the ball up high and, with the hot faces, longer graphite shafts, etc, tend to allow for an easier swing at the ball to achieve the same distance. So you don't have to feel you need to kills the ball with the 4 hybrid to get it out there like you would with a 4 iron.

I'll give you two answers to your second question. The first is the better answers, but you'll hate it. The first answer is you need to go and try a bunch of different hybrids with different combinations of shaft and loft and just see what you hit better. Anything I say in the second part of my answer won't trump what you find through your own experience. But to give you something to look at, I'd say that Callaway is pretty much the leader in hybrids right now. You can probably get a deal on the X Hot hybrids (2013 models) that aren't a big difference from the X2 Hot or the current XR. Taylormade's Jetspeed hybrids (and woods and drivers) are going for nothing these days. They were a product line that was actually fine, but tanked commercially and there's a glut of them. Nike Covert hybrids are also cheap these days but good. There's plenty of others. As for the scratch vs. HC divide, you'll see some clubs marketed as Pro or Tour or TP that are generally designed for better players, but it depends on what you find you hit better. The club doesn't know who's hitting it. If you like an X2 Hot Pro hybrid, go for it. I play at Tour 3-wood and I love it. Has a sweet black face and is adjustable in loft and I prefer the shape of it. Wouldn't trade it for the regular model even if you gave me the trade for free. It's personal preference. Anyway, try some previous year's models and consider buying used. Taylormade and Callaway both have great Preowned websites.

As for your 7W, it makes sense. 7W has a lot of loft and it's easy to get up into the air off of the ground.

Thanks a lot for the advice! Yeah maybe "all right" wasn't really the best wording. I have pretty low standards right now, but even then it's probably not an adequate description. I guess what I meant to say is that I don't really have any problems that are specific to my long irons, other than the distance being a question.

I'll try to find a shop near me that will allow me to try out some different hybrids. Its going to be a stressful process because I hate hitting in front of people, but I would rather get the right clubs if I am going to spend the money then just guess at something and end up hating it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3306 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Here's the thing, the Rules are fine here, the problem is at the local Committee (or lack of Committee) level.  The basic Rule is appropriate for most Temporary Water in a Bunker situations.  Indeed, it offers a bit more flexibility than the Rule for Temporary Water in the General Area offers, in that you're allowed to find the Point of Maximum Available Relief, instead of requiring Complete Relief.  And for more unusual circumstances, the Rules offer an alternative in for form of a Model Local Rule.  They don't want every single player to have the authority to claim "I have no possible relief in this bunker, I'll just take it out for free", they want that authority to be at a higher level. I speak only for myself, but the more I learn about the Rules, the more I respect the way they've been put together, and the consistency of concepts throughout.  Its easy to single out one rule in isolation that you dislike, but when you see how the rules fit together as a whole things often make a lot more sense.  No doubt, Rules should be reviewed and improved, really smart people are continually doing just that, looking for cracks and loopholes.  But the changes that actually happen are really tested to see if they actually improve things, change for the sake of change just isn't going to happen.  
    • Wordle 1,052 6/6 ⬜⬜🟨🟨⬜ ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩     I hear y'all. Could easily have been a birdie or par at worst.
    • Are you on the app or on the website? On the website, if you go to the performance tab, you can navigate with the side menu to see more detailed information. On those pages, you can switch between strokes gained and standard stats. You can see things like strokes gained from 50-100, 100-150, etc., strokes gained on lengths of putts. You can switch to standard information and see make rates on putt lengths. There's a good amount there to shape your practice. I don't use the app for this, so I can't help with that.
    • Temporary grandstands are in the general area though, a bunker is not so your relief options are different.  I don't really understand what is so difficult about this.  You should be more upset with whoever organizes/runs your league for not implementing GUR, not the rule itself. Especially since this is a league and if it's at the same course every time it's likely that this isn't the first time the bunker has filled up completely with water.
    • Not sure if this is best to post here or start a new thread but I'm curious which stats you pay most attention to/how you utilize Shot Scope's data/charts to drive your improvement/practice?   I have 81 holes in Shot Scope now so starting to get a decent sample size of data about my game. I can obviously see the strokes gained numbers but I'm not quite sure where to go from there in terms of how to assess what specifically I need to work on.  Obviously it's approaches and short game for me, but when I go into those tabs on the left for those specific areas, I'm not quite sure how to use the information to make it actionable in my practice.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...