Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3185 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I searched for this topic and didn't see anything, so I apologize if it's been discussed before.  @iacas, I was reading LSW and have a question about the ratio of backswing to downswing.  For those who haven't read the book, there is a chapter on maximizing clubhead speed, and one of the sections discusses how fast your backswing is compared to your downswing.  Good players/fast swingers have a ratio of between 2.5:1 to 3:1.  Most amateurs and slower swingers have a ratio of 4:1 to 5:1.  To improve this ratio, the recommendation is to increase the speed of the backswing.

My question is, isn't it possible to improve the ratio without increasing clubhead speed?  If the backswing speed is faster, but the downswing stays the same, the ratio would be better, but the end result would be the same, would it not?  Or, if the backswing speed is increased, and the downswing speed is increased, wouldn't the ratio still not be very good, even though more swing speed is being generated?  Help straighten me out on this concept.

(BTW, I'm impressed with the book so far...it's a really different approach than anything else I've read and I'm on board with everything else, I just don't understand this part)

Bridgestone j40 445 w/ Graphite Design AD DJ-7
Callaway Steelhead Plus 3 wood w/ RCH Pro Series 3.2
Adams Idea Pro hybrids (3 & 4) w/ Aldila VS Proto 
Bridgestone j33 CB (5-PW) w/ original Rifle 5.5
Bridgestone West Coast 52*, j40 satin 56* & 60* w/ DG S-300
Odyssey White Hot XG #9
Bridgestone B330-RX

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
32 minutes ago, 1badbadger said:

My question is, isn't it possible to improve the ratio without increasing clubhead speed?  If the backswing speed is faster, but the downswing stays the same, the ratio would be better, but the end result would be the same, would it not?

The point is… increasing your backswing speed often leads to an increased downswing speed. A lot of amateurs, we've found, are just swinging slowly. They need to learn to "let it go" a little more. Making a faster backswing helps them do that.

And there are obviously exceptions, particularly on the LPGA Tour, of pros who have slow backswings. I'd be curious though if they too wouldn't swing a little faster with a faster backswing. :-)

32 minutes ago, 1badbadger said:

Or, if the backswing speed is increased, and the downswing speed is increased, wouldn't the ratio still not be very good, even though more swing speed is being generated?  Help straighten me out on this concept.

That would be true but only if they increased the same percentage.

4:1 might speed up to 3:0.95. Faster downswing, much different ratio.

32 minutes ago, 1badbadger said:

(BTW, I'm impressed with the book so far...it's a really different approach than anything else I've read and I'm on board with everything else, I just don't understand this part)

You're a more experienced player, too. And this advice isn't universal for everyone. It's just something to try that works for a lot of people.

  • Upvote 2

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

And I've noticed this with my own swing, following the "old" advice of a slow backswing. If I do that I tend to "jump" or "lunge" from the top! And the swing goes haywire!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3185 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.