Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3163 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm heading to a conference in June about an hour away from Torrey Pines.  Conference ends Wednesday at 1pm, and hope to be able to get to Torrey Pines by 3pm, twilight starts at 330pm.  Anyone have any advice to get on as a single.  I prefer to play the South, but not opposed to the playing the north.  TIA


  • Administrator
Posted

Paging @mvmac, @Golfingdad, @tristanhilton85, and a bunch of others who can help you out…

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, zamzam23 said:

I'm heading to a conference in June about an hour away from Torrey Pines.  Conference ends Wednesday at 1pm, and hope to be able to get to Torrey Pines by 3pm, twilight starts at 330pm.  Anyone have any advice to get on as a single.  I prefer to play the South, but not opposed to the playing the north.  TIA

I would imagine that as a single on a mid-week afternoon that late in the day, you'd be able to get on without too much issue.  But I really have no idea, as I haven't played at Torrey in couple of years and I've never tried to walk-on there.  

BTW, according to this website, the twilight rates start at 3pm.

In addition to @mvmac, I believe @Hacker James and @No Mulligans are the other San Diego locals around here.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

The North, due to the remodel and extra related maintenance, is currently only offering tee times to about 2 pm.  The North is less expensive, about 2 or 3 strokes easier, and 80% of the San Diego resident rounds are on the North.

The South is the U.S. open course.  (Both courses are played when the PGA plays the regular yearly tournament at Torrey, North and South on Thursday, Friday; South only on Saturday and Sunday after the cut)  Right now this is what is available today on the South as of 4 PM.  I'm guessing they drop the times from this list that are within an hour, there are most likely spots available for a walk on for the 4 - 5 PM slots.  Note that only locals with a resident card can use that online system.  Also note, those are the resident rates.

 As a single on a weekday you have a good chance in the afternoon as a walk on.  If you don't want to risk not getting on you can pay extra and use the advanced reservation system: https://www.sandiego.gov/park-and-recreation/golf/torreypines/reservations

 

Torrey South.PNG

Here is all that is currently available on both courses for tomorrow; only Torrey South afternoon/evening times are not taken.

Torrey 2.PNG

Edit, I was wrong there are currently some times on the North available this Saturday.  That is encouraging to see times available on a Saturday.  It's starting to become less impacted after the novelty of the remodel is wearing off.  Granted it's only 4 times with room for a single only, but believe it or not, this is the best I've seen in the last 7 months.

 

Edited by No Mulligans
  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thanks so much, I will have to check to see if the openings line up with my free time after the conference.  


Posted

Would you choose to play the north or south course?  I'm not sure if/when I will get the opportunity to play there again, so trying to fill the a bucket list.  Thanks!


Posted
3 hours ago, zamzam23 said:

Would you choose to play the north or south course?  I'm not sure if/when I will get the opportunity to play there again, so trying to fill the a bucket list.  Thanks!

I think it's a toss up.  They both have holes bordering the ocean, I'd put the North at just a tiny bit more scenic.  But the south, that's a U.S. open course.  It's nice to have the experience of playing an Open course (but more expensive).

Right now you wouldn't have a choice as the North is not open for any tee times after 2 PM, maybe that will change soon.

As a walk on you might want to just request first available and let fate decide.

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 minutes ago, No Mulligans said:

As a walk on you might want to just request first available and let fate decide.

Agree 100%.:beer:

Both courses are beautiful.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3163 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.