Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3096 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm sure some of you have seen this, it may have already appeared here, but I didn't find it using search. The full PDF is 36 pages. You may disagree, so FWIW.

http://wishongolf.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/New-12Myths-PDF-2014.pdf

The 12 Myths

  1. Modern Golf Clubs Hit the Ball Farther
  2. The Lower the Loft on Your Driver, The Farther the Ball will Go
  3. You Can’t Go Wrong if you Stick with Well Known Brand Name Clubs
  4. Your New Driver has a Larger Sweet Spot
  5. When I Buy a Club with an S-Flex Shaft I Know I am Getting a Stiff Flex
  6. The Faster You Swing, The Stiffer Your Shaft Should Be
  7. The Longer the Length of the Driver, The Farther You’ll Hit the Ball
  8. My Clubs are Just Like the Ones the Pros Use
  9. Women’s Clubs are Designed for Women Golfers
  10. I am not a Good Enough Golfer for Custom Fit Clubs to Matter
  11. I’ll Just Cut Down Some Clubs for my Kid; That’s Good Enough
  12. I was Custom Fit at the Big Golf Store (or Pro Shop or Online)
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I just started to check this out and have to say I'm skeptical about this guy partway through Myth #1.  He doesn't take into account dynamic loft, redistributed weight and club forgiveness when he claims that today's 7 iron is the same as a 4 or 5 iron from 30-50 years ago.  Today's game improvement 7 irons certain do go farther - on a par with two clubs more from a couple of decades back, sure.  However, the flight apex, decent angle and spin rate of today's 7 iron is vastly different than the 5 iron from that era.  Given the author's obvious knowledge of the game and it's equipment, neglecting to mention those indicates a willful bias on his part to me.

That being said, he's spot on for Myth #2... except that he fails to mention how much driver spin affects carry and distance, which again is a major factor overall.

I'm going to read through the whole thing, but I'm definitely bringing along a lot of grains of salt for the read.

:tmade: R11 9* Blur Stiff --- R11 14* 3w Blur Stiff --- Rescue 11 21* Aldila RIP Stiff :tmade: Tour Preferred CB 3i-6i --- MC 7i --- MB 8i-PW - Project X Flighted 6.0, custom lie and lofts :vokey: Oil Can 52.08 --- Oil Can 56.11 --- Oil Can 60.07 :cameron: 1996 Catalina - Custom specs made @ :titleist:


Posted

I honestly appreciate the insight, on other threads too. Wishon sounded very factual to me, but that may be due to unfounded biases from my 15+ year absence from golf. What's changed has been surprising to me. Thanks...

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

There may be some bias in some of Tom's thinking, but only due to his years of experience and to some extent his preponderance to "fly in the face" of some of the big manufactures and some of their claims that have proven to be questionable. His articles on adjustable drivers back up fairly conclusively his reasonings. It is obvious that he favors bonded heads over the adjustables, but he also has produced them and from what he said, he was one of the pioneers in the technology. Bottom line,they are his opinions and he is convinced they are valid. His biggest thing is to Get Fitted.

"James"

:titleist: 913 D3 with Aldila RIP Phenom 60 4,2 Regular Shaft,  :touredge: Exotics XCG-7 Beta 3W with Matrix Red Tie Shaft:touredge: Exotics EX8 19 deg Hybrid w UST Mamiya Recoil F3 Shaft:touredge: Exotics EX9 28 deg Hybrid w UST Mamiya Recoil F3  shaft, / Bobby Jones Black 22 deg Hybrid:touredge: Exotics EXi 6 -PW  w UST Mamiya Recoil F2 Shaft, SW (56),GW (52),LW (60):touredge:  TGS),/ ODDYSEE Metal-X #7 customized putter (400G, cut down Mid Belly)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 hours ago, Midpack said:

I honestly appreciate the insight, on other threads too. Wishon sounded very factual to me, but that may be due to unfounded biases from my 15+ year absence from golf. What's changed has been surprising to me. Thanks...

Have you read Ralph Maltby on fitting topics?

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Shindig said:

Have you read Ralph Maltby on fitting topics?

No, but I'll look for it. I found a book, is that what you're referring to? Thanks!

Edited by Midpack
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 6/13/2017 at 3:25 PM, Midpack said:

No, but I'll look for it. I found a book, is that what you're referring to? Thanks!

There are books and also http://ralphmaltby.com/ has articles.  GolfWorks.com has some of his articles / MPF postings too.

  • Upvote 1

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Well, when you design an iron that is basically the same length and loft of an old, "back in the day" 5 iron, and stick a 7 on it what would you expect the marketing mavens to say? But of course it wasn't that sudden, it was incremental. First the 6 iron crept into 5 iron territory. Then, as lengths increased and loft decreased, along came the 7. The modern day 7 iron plays about what an old, "back in the day" 5 1/2 iron would.

The question Wishon asks that is thought provoking is why is it, with all the "game improvement" features built into clubs these days, why have handicaps indices not declined significantly?!

And why are there hybrids and gap wedges now? The hybrids came first because long irons became impossible to hit for most golfers. I finally dumped my 2 iron when it basically became a "Driving Iron" or a 0 iron! I don't carry an iron club lower in number than a 6 any more!

And gap wedges? Where did the gap come from? It came from the PW following the 9 iron in stronger loft. But, they couldn't do that with the SW or you couldn't get out of the sand with it! So, there was suddenly a 10 degree "gap" between the PW and SW! Thus, the gap wedge.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3096 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.