Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6372 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. what's your preference

    • I have GPS
      29
    • I have a rangefinder
      28
    • I use course markings, but want GPS
      39
    • I use course markings, but want a rangefinder
      39
    • I use course markings and that's fine by me
      86
    • I have GPS and a rangefinder
      5


Recommended Posts

Posted
GPS, rangefinder, course markings? What would you prefer?

I just purchased an i-golf caddieII...
My Clubs: Callaway FT-i Tour LCG 9.5° w/ Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 stiff; Sonartec GS Tour 14° w/ Graphite Design Red Ice 70 stiff; Adams Idea Pro 2h(18°) & 3h(20°) w/ Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff; Adams Idea Pro Forged 4-PW w/ TT Black Gold stiff; Cleveland CG12 DSG RTG 52°-10° & 58°-10°; Odyssey...

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
i prefer course markings - makes the game fair for everyone.

what are the rulings on using rangefinders and/or GPS? i've read variations on this site and in a UK magazine it said that rangefinders were allowed.

WEAPONS:
Taylormade R9 10.5 L Grafalloy Prolaunch Platinum stiff 65g
Taylormade R9 15 NU YS+6 stiff 65g
Taylormade R9 19 NU YS+6 stiff 65g
Taylormade Tour Preferred 4-PW KBS Tour X-Stiff Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 51Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 55Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 59Yes! Tracy II putterTitleist...


Posted
GPS, rangefinder, course markings? What would you prefer?

i like the ideal of everyone using course markings.

but for practice and for better judging distances by site > therefore playing naturally (in comps for example) > i like the thought of range finders.
Driver: Callaway Diablo Edge Tour 10.5* (UST Proforce v2 77g X Flex) 3 Wood: Callaway Diablo 15* (UST Proforce v2 86g S Flex). 2 Hybrid: Adams A4 Tech 17* (UST Proforce v2 105g S Flex). 3 and 4 Hybrid: Adams Idea Pro 20* and 23* (UST Proforce v2 105g S Flex)
Irons: Tour Edge Exotics...

Posted
I prefer to use course marking simply because I feel they are more accurate.

I have played with people that use rangefinders and I have seen them get the distance wrong by over 30 yds.

Maybe they have newer, better ones now though. I have never tried one personally.

What do the new rules say about rangefinders? Anyone know?
In My Grom Stand Bag:

Driver:
Big Bertha 460 Graphite 10°
Woods: Big Bertha 3&5 Graphite
Hybrid: r7 Rescue 19° Irons: 06 Big Bertha #4-SWPutter: 35 in. Rossie Mallet *Soon to be Bettinardi C03H 34"Ball: ProV1x

Posted

I use course markings, especially now that I play a course with accurate markings. One of my buddies has a rangefinder, and it's nice when he gives me yardages sometimes while we play, especially if it's at a course I haven't played before.

I used to play a course that typically had inaccurate markings. I was once at the 100 yard markers and someone with a rangefinder measured 130 yards to a pin in the center of the green. One of many reasons I don't play that course anymore.
I like using the non-technological way of measuring things... and then I hit it with my cavity-back irons and hybrids, so I'm not sure if that's a fair description

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I use a Bushnell Rangefinder during practice rounds, but only to measure bunker carries and things of that nature. Im much more confident with using a pin sheet and walking it off as opposed to a rangefinder.

Monster Tour 10.5* w/ Redboard 63
FP400f 14.5* w/ GD YSQ
Idea Pro 18* w/ VS Proto 80s
MP FLi-Hi 21 w/ S300
CG1 BP w/ PX 6.0 SM 54.11 SM 60.08 Sophia 33"


Posted
i prefer course markings - makes the game fair for everyone.

Rangefinders are allowed in tournament play as long as they're not ones that give slope. That's why Bushnell has the slope version and tournament version. The tournament is allowed in competition, the slope is not, as far as I understand it.

Ping G 410 10.5 ˚ Driver Ping Tour Stiff Shaft
Ping G 410 14.5˚ 3 Ping Tour Stiff Shaft
Ping G 410 19˚ Ping Tour Stiff Shaft
i 500 irons 4-UW 1/2 inch over, blue dot, NS Pro Modus 105 Stiff Shafts
Ping Stealth Wedges Wedges  54˚ 58˚

Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 34" 


Posted
what are the rulings on using rangefinders and/or GPS? i've read variations on this site and in a UK magazine it said that rangefinders were allowed.

the above post is correct regarding rangefinders...

as to GPS... USGA allows per a local rule... not on PGA though.
My Clubs: Callaway FT-i Tour LCG 9.5° w/ Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 stiff; Sonartec GS Tour 14° w/ Graphite Design Red Ice 70 stiff; Adams Idea Pro 2h(18°) & 3h(20°) w/ Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff; Adams Idea Pro Forged 4-PW w/ TT Black Gold stiff; Cleveland CG12 DSG RTG 52°-10° & 58°-10°; Odyssey...

Posted
I have a Sky Caddie SG3 GPS. I find it interesting how many people are against them as "unfair" or some kind of technological advantage. They are really nothing more than an electronic yardage book as they don't measure anything -- they tell you where you are standing and how far to front/center/back of the green and other points of interest on the hole (doglegs, bunkers, creeks, lakes, etc.). Same as having a caddy with a good yardage book and pin sheet. Since most courses I play don't have caddies or yardage books I don't see a problem with using a GPS that has that same information. I also don't play the same course all the time (some I may only play one time) so making a yardage book for myself is not a possibility. I like that I can download an accurate course map quickly and easily and don't mind paying a small subscription fee to do so. I look at is as the same thing as buying a yardage book at courses that actually still have them.

Are you guys that think you should just go by course markers also opposed to caddies, yardage books and pin sheets?

I could kind of see being opposed to rangefinders as they measure the actual distance to an object (very accurately I might add). Still, a good yardage book and pin sheet will get you within a yard or two as well and they've been used in the game for decades.

One other thing, my GPS has improved my speed of play considerably. No more trying to find some kind of marker and pacing off distance -- I simply look at the GPS as I have arrived at my ball, take any prevaling course conditions into account, pick my club and hit the shot. This can save a good amount of time over a typical 18 hole round. It saves even more time when off the beaten path of the fairway.

What's in my bag (most of the time)

Exotics 12°, Aldila VS Proto 65S
Exotics CB1 4W, 16.5°, Fujikura Stiff
3DX DC Ironwood 20°, 23°, 26º Hybrids, Proforce V2 Stiff Acer XP905 Pro 6-PW, Dynalite Gold S300Inazone CNC Spin Satin GW 50°/8°, SW 54°/14°, LW 58°/4°Boccieri...


Posted
I use the Sky Caddie SG2, and the reaction of other players has been mixed. Some make snide comments like, "does it hit the ball too?", but later on in the round they end up checking with me out of curiousity to see it it matches the yardage they calculated. Others say, "My wife has to get me one of those!"

It is an advantage especially calculating distance to the pin with deep greens, but tournaments allow it to be used, it's similar to using a caddie but not nearly as helpful.

Big assist is that it saves a lot of time, helps older people not feel so rushed to pace off yardages, and greatly helps when you're far away from any yardage markers. No one complains about carts with GPS.

BTW it doesn't hit the ball for you . . . not yet anyway!

2009 Burner R
FT-I Fusion Squareway 3W 15* Fujikura Speeder Fit-On R
5W R7 R
FT Fusion Hybrids Draw 3/21*, 4/24*
G5 5-PW X-forged Vintage: 52.12, 56.14MDScotty Cameron: Newport 2 ProV1


Posted
I have a Sky Caddie SG3 GPS. I find it interesting how many people are against them as "unfair" or some kind of technological advantage. They are really nothing more than an electronic yardage book as they don't measure anything -- they tell you where you are standing and how far to front/center/back of the green and other points of interest on the hole (doglegs, bunkers, creeks, lakes, etc.). Same as having a caddy with a good yardage book and pin sheet. Since most courses I play don't have caddies or yardage books I don't see a problem with using a GPS that has that same information. I also don't play the same course all the time (some I may only play one time) so making a yardage book for myself is not a possibility. I like that I can download an accurate course map quickly and easily and don't mind paying a small subscription fee to do so. I look at is as the same thing as buying a yardage book at courses that actually still have them.

absolutely 100% agree... don't understand people who say they are unfair or otherwise. They definately DO speed up play too. And, as you said, makes playing a new course 1,000 times more enjoyable.

I can't wait to make an extremely accurate yardage book on how far I hit my new clubs.
My Clubs: Callaway FT-i Tour LCG 9.5° w/ Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 stiff; Sonartec GS Tour 14° w/ Graphite Design Red Ice 70 stiff; Adams Idea Pro 2h(18°) & 3h(20°) w/ Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff; Adams Idea Pro Forged 4-PW w/ TT Black Gold stiff; Cleveland CG12 DSG RTG 52°-10° & 58°-10°; Odyssey...

Posted

anyone know the R&A; ruling on these devices?

just googled it - interesting article: http://www.golftoday.co.uk/news/year...ight_lies.html
What keeps the USGA from pushing harder for rangefinders is its harmonious relationship with the Royal & Ancient Golf Club, which sets the rules everywhere else in the world. The next time the rules can be changed is 2008, but the R&A; is in no hurry to adopt an electronic yardage book. "I think many people in the UK are opposed to these devices," R&A; secretary Peter Dawson said. "These items are much more prevalent in the U.S., despite the fact they are against the Rules of Golf. It's remarkable they are allowed for handicapping purposes." Told that the Tight Lies Tour was going to use the SkyGolf GPS rangefinder next year, Dawson replied, "That staggers me. I suppose they're not going to have stroke-and-distance for going out of bounds?"

WEAPONS:
Taylormade R9 10.5 L Grafalloy Prolaunch Platinum stiff 65g
Taylormade R9 15 NU YS+6 stiff 65g
Taylormade R9 19 NU YS+6 stiff 65g
Taylormade Tour Preferred 4-PW KBS Tour X-Stiff Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 51Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 55Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 59Yes! Tracy II putterTitleist...


Posted
I say each to his/her own and if you enjoy playing with one, then that's great, but i still prefer the good old fashioned way of pacing out from markers etc :)

Posted
The other side of the coin is this... as mentioned in the article...

"But the USGA is hardly frowning on the use of rangefinders."

"I don't think it's any secret that the USGA favors allowing them to be used under the rules," USGA executive director David Fay said. "My personal view is that it enables guys like me to get the type of yardage assistance that (caddie) Steve Williams is providing Tiger Woods."



Why shouldn't the average player be able to KNOW the distances to trouble spots, just as a tour player would.
Back in the day caddies paced off the entire course pre-round... now they just pick up really detailed yardage books. If I had a great yardage book given to me I wouldn't want to carry my GPS, but since many courses are poorly marked, and very few have any sort of yardage guide that gives me distance to bunkers, creeks, etc., I 'll use my GPS and it'll save me a few shots.

Nothing pisses me off worse than playing a new course that has no yardage to different spots given, and I end up driving my ball into the water, or through the fairway. Also hate when I'm playing a long par 5 and I'm 250 out or so, and have to walk all the way up to the 200 (first marking the course has), then back to my ball, jujst to get a yardage.

The R&A; has this one wrong... and the USGA is headed in the better direction... just my 2 cents
My Clubs: Callaway FT-i Tour LCG 9.5° w/ Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 stiff; Sonartec GS Tour 14° w/ Graphite Design Red Ice 70 stiff; Adams Idea Pro 2h(18°) & 3h(20°) w/ Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff; Adams Idea Pro Forged 4-PW w/ TT Black Gold stiff; Cleveland CG12 DSG RTG 52°-10° & 58°-10°; Odyssey...

Posted
I use the Bushnell Pinseeker. They are approved by the USGA but the USGA defers to local rule sheets and in some amateur tournaments they may not be allowed per local rules. At least that is what I have found here in Arkansas. I personally grew up stepping off from yardage markers, but have found them to be very accurate. Not only do they seek the pin distance, but can give you distances to water hazards, sand traps, front of green distance, etc. The best thing is they speed up play. I compared my Bushnell laser to my golf buddy's SkyCaddie and the distances are very, very close if not dead on. At times it has saved me a couple of strokes on pin distances per round. Nice tool to have.

Ping hoofer bag Ping G15 10.5* Driver, stock reg shaft Ping G15 3 metal, Aldila 75g Stiff shaft Ping G15 5 metal, Aldila 75g Stiff shaft Mizuno MP 69 3-PW irons, DG S300 shafts Mizuno MP R12 black nickel 52* and 56* gap and sand wedges, DG spinner W+ shafts Mizuno 20* FLiHi Clk hybrids, Project X 5.5 shaft 25 year old Bulls Eye putter, 33" or Ping Anser 2 Scottsdale 34" First round of golf was in 1963 at age 10. Best round -1. 2 Holes-In-One.


Posted
anyone know the R&A; ruling on these devices?

Quote: What keeps the USGA from pushing harder for rangefinders is its harmonious relationship with the Royal & Ancient Golf Club, which sets the rules everywhere else in the world. The next time the rules can be changed is 2008, but the R&A; is in no hurry to adopt an electronic yardage book. "I think many people in the UK are opposed to these devices," R&A; secretary Peter Dawson said. "These items are much more prevalent in the U.S., despite the fact they are against the Rules of Golf. It's remarkable they are allowed for handicapping purposes." Told that the Tight Lies Tour was going to use the SkyGolf GPS rangefinder next year, Dawson replied, "That staggers me. I suppose they're not going to have stroke-and-distance for going out of bounds?"

Peter Dawson should drag his butt over to the U.S. and play a course he's never played before with no caddy or yardage book and see what he thinks then. I think one of the reasons the R&A; is so against them is that it's much much more common for courses in the UK to have caddies with lots of local knowledge. You can hardly find a caddy anymore here in the US, let alone one with local knowledge.

What's in my bag (most of the time)

Exotics 12°, Aldila VS Proto 65S
Exotics CB1 4W, 16.5°, Fujikura Stiff
3DX DC Ironwood 20°, 23°, 26º Hybrids, Proforce V2 Stiff Acer XP905 Pro 6-PW, Dynalite Gold S300Inazone CNC Spin Satin GW 50°/8°, SW 54°/14°, LW 58°/4°Boccieri...


Posted
Peter Dawson should drag his butt over to the U.S. and play a course he's never played before with no caddy or yardage book and see what he thinks then. I think one of the reasons the R&A; is so against them is that it's much much more common for courses in the UK to have caddies with lots of local knowledge. You can hardly find a caddy anymore here in the US, let alone one with local knowledge.

Couldn't agree more... Dawson should try some of our courses w/o a caddie or any knowledge of distance to hazards. I just can't understand why he has a problem with people having a YARDAGE. His comments make me mad just thinking about them...

"not going to have stroke and distance" ... what a jackass!
My Clubs: Callaway FT-i Tour LCG 9.5° w/ Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 stiff; Sonartec GS Tour 14° w/ Graphite Design Red Ice 70 stiff; Adams Idea Pro 2h(18°) & 3h(20°) w/ Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff; Adams Idea Pro Forged 4-PW w/ TT Black Gold stiff; Cleveland CG12 DSG RTG 52°-10° & 58°-10°; Odyssey...

Note: This thread is 6372 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.