Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2948 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I started this topic on another forum site, but didn't get a lot of responses. I recently switched back to a 12 year old set of fairway woods. I'm playing the 2004 Callaway Big Bertha 3 and 5 woods. I've been struggling with graphite shafted fairways for some time. At 67 my distance off the tee is diminishing and I need to be able to consistently play fairways on the longer par fours and the par fives. It got so bad that I was actually laying up with irons to avoid cold topping the ball or hitting it so poorly my third shots were  unplayable. I cannot explain this because I know almost everyone finds graphite easier to play and longer than steel.. Maybe it's a swing weight issue or an overall weight issue. Is anyone else experiencing this?


Posted

I have steel shafts in every club up to, and including, my 22* hybrid but my longer clubs (19* hybrid to driver) are stiff graphite.  I like to think of my 22* as another iron so maybe the steel shaft tricks my brain a little, who knows, either way i hit it great.

I think a lot of it is personal preference and what feels better for a particular person. Didnt Tiger play steel shaft in his driver in his early pro years?

Russ, from "sunny" Yorkshire = :-( 

In the bag: Driver: Ping G5 , Woods:Dunlop NZ9, 4 Hybrid: Tayormade Burner, 4-SW: Hippo Beast Bi-Metal , Wedges: Wilson 1200, Putter: Cleveland Smartsquare Blade, Ball: AD333

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think you're right about Tiger. My guess is it may be a confidence issue as well. I probably played my best golf ten to fifteen years ago when these steel shafted 2004 Big Bertha fairways were in the bag. Frankly, I cannot remember why I went to graphite in the first place. It's probably because everyone else did and steel shafted fairways were hard to find. Also, I've been playing for over fifty years and I have always been a sweeper (rather than a digger) when playing fairway wood or long iron shots. Now days I see guys on the tour taking divots with their fairway woods. One would have never done that back in the persimmon days. 


  • 2 months later...
Posted

Update: Well, I've gone back to my graphite shafted GBB fairways. I finally figured out my swing flaw and my index is dropping. It's a shame Winter is coming. Although we play year round here in Charlotte we still have some wet, cold days (like today!)


Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Hoganman1 said:

Well, I've gone back to my graphite shafted GBB fairways.

A couple of years ago, I stumbled across a set of Callaway Hawkeye titanium-headed FWs: 3, 5, 7, and 9, with graphite shafts. I haven't put them in my main bag, but the clubs feel solid when I hit them. (But my current 815As fly a bit longer).

One thing about your graphites: these were the old 0.350" shafts, a tad thicker than the current 0.335" long-club shafts. The older FWs, it you can hit them, may be slightly more stable than the newer ones.

It turns out that TM went back to 0.350" shafts on a couple of variations of its SLDR drivers and FWs, seeking a bit more stability. 

Edited by WUTiger

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, WUTiger said:

A couple of years ago, I stumbled across a set of Callaway Hawkeye titanium-headed FWs: 3, 5, 7, and 9, with graphite shafts. I haven't put them in my main bag, but the clubs feel solid when I hit them. (But my current 815As fly a bit longer).

One thing about your graphites: these were the old 0.350" shafts, a tad thicker than the current 0.335" long-club shafts. The older FWs, it you can hit them, may be slightly more stable than the newer ones.

It turns out that TM went back to 0.350" shafts on a couple of variations of its SLDR drivers and FWs, seeking a bit more stability. 

I did not know that many golfers who enjoyed .350 shafts because they lacked feel. OEMs used them because they did not want to deal with warranty issues and .335 shafts cracking. I don't think the issue was performance related as to stability - but economics.

As to steel v graphite and poor performance, it can be a club issue as to weight, but it's probably a swing issue and even a ball position and address position or weight transfer issue. Or a LOFT issue - 43 inch and 15 degrees is not easy to launch at a certain age - either the loft must increase and/or the shaft length must decrease.

Edited by Mr. Desmond
  • Informative 1

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
7 hours ago, Mr. Desmond said:

I did not know that many golfers who enjoyed .350 shafts because they lacked feel. OEMs used them because they did not want to deal with warranty issues and .335 shafts cracking. I don't think the issue was performance related as to stability - but economics

Interesting view of things. A TM rep has said the SLDR variants resurrected .350 tips to increase stability. I guess it's a trade-off thing.

Mr. D, I wasn't aware of the .335 shafts cracking. Is this a persistent problem, or just one with the early versions?

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
33 minutes ago, WUTiger said:

Interesting view of things. A TM rep has said the SLDR variants resurrected .350 tips to increase stability. I guess it's a trade-off thing.

Mr. D, I wasn't aware of the .335 shafts cracking. Is this a persistent problem, or just one with the early versions?

You must remember the flimsy shafts that OEMs brought out in the late '90's-00's. The quality was not there and for most of the first decade, if memory is somewhat right, several major OEMs used .350 for warranty purposes - at least that's what we read and that's what people posted. But everyone preferred the feel of .335 shafts - Was it around 2009 or maybe before, the trend was back to .335 shafts - of course, people were making better stock shafts by that time and golfers were complaining that they wanted .335 shafts, like the big boys used on Tour.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
54 minutes ago, Mr. Desmond said:

You must remember the flimsy shafts that OEMs brought out in the late '90's-00's.

That hits a dead zone for me. I played with the same set of Ping Eye 2 clone irons from 1994 to 2008. I had a component driver and steel-shafted metalwoods fitted at the same time. I swapped to an Air Zevo driver from about 2000 until 2008. I picked up some Tour Edge Bazooka FWs with the .350 Grafalloy Ultralight graphite stiff shafts (green heads and shafts); played them from about 2001 to 2009, but they proved too stiff for me as I got older.

So, I guess I missed out on the play by play of the early .335 shaft problems.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, WUTiger said:

That hits a dead zone for me. I played with the same set of Ping Eye 2 clone irons from 1994 to 2008. I had a component driver and steel-shafted metalwoods fitted at the same time. I swapped to an Air Zevo driver from about 2000 until 2008. I picked up some Tour Edge Bazooka FWs with the .350 Grafalloy Ultralight graphite stiff shafts (green heads and shafts); played them from about 2001 to 2009, but they proved too stiff for me as I got older.

So, I guess I missed out on the play by play of the early .335 shaft problems.

I don't know if a real problem ever existed -- sounded like an excuse to assure themselves the problem would not exist - maybe an accountant suggested it. D#mn beancounters screwing with the quality and feel of a shaft... lol.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2948 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.