Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

PGA vs. LPGA short game


Note: This thread is 2862 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I recall reading that PGA tour professionals' short games are far better than that of LPGA players.  This came up again in a discussion with a friend of mine who asserted that the LPGA players' short game was just as good or better than PGA players'.  Does anyone know for sure and, if so, can you point me to definitive statistics on the point? 

It would seem the players would be able to practice equally, so if PGA players are better, what is the explanation?  Maybe strength contributes to short game prowess more than seems obvious? 

Did a search on the forum and it didn't pop up already, so my apologies if this has been discussed ad nauseum in the past. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I don't have a real answer, but my guess would be the guys are stronger and can get closer to the pin out trouble shots than the girls can. Closer equals fewer putts. 

Now, I would probably pay to watch the best of the best from both leagues, take on each other in a short game tournament. 

I was a regular for a while watching the girls play the boys in their 3 tour tournament.  The girls actually won some of those matches. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

LPGA Tour players are not as good as PGA Tour players. Not at the top end, not in the middle, and definitely not anywhere at the bottom.

Why? Three things…

  • There's more money involved for guys, and thus a lot more competition. They get better coaching, they are a smaller percentage of the top players who play, and you're not truly comparing equals: the men are the top 0.0001% of male golfers, the women are the top 0.01% (I'm making the numbers up but you should get the point).
  • Men are capable of using speed more than women are capable (or willing) to use speed with the short game. Pitches require speed. Bunker shots require speed. Spinners require speed.
  • Men compete against other guys from early on, playing putting and chipping games on the putting green. They learn to experiment a little more, and they build a better feel and library of shots.

The first and the third are relevant to both putting and the short game. The middle is mostly the short game.

https://www.golfdigest.com/story/putting-matthew-rudy (Though, be wary of "putts per round" type numbers: the distances from the hole may be different, the green speeds are different, the # of GIR may be different, etc.)

  • Like 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Interesting Golf Digest article on ladies’ putting.  I enjoy watching some of the LPGA events and have always wondered why their putting is noticeably not as sharp as the guys on the PGA.  

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2862 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
    • Wordle 1,630 4/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟨🟨⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟨🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Good job!  I struggled with this for some reason. Wordle 1,630 5/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟩⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩⬜🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟨🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,630 3/6* ⬛🟨⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟨🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.