Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2854 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

i have a set of Mizuno MP 33 that have DG R300 shafts, I'm thinking of reshafting them with Nippon 950 GH.   Should I spend the money to reshaft them ? 

 

 


Posted

You would have lighter clubs with a slightly lower bend point and, presumably, a higher launch.  If that's what you are looking for...why not?  

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thanks Piz, what I'm wondering , are MP 33 worth putting the cost of reshafting. They are a good looking blade..


Posted

I'm of the mind that if you really like a particular club there is no reason to abandon it entirely.  Why toss away all the years spent together, in triumph and tragedy, for what is, at best, a suspicion?  Re-shafting isn't difficult and doesn't require a boat load of expensive tools.  Why not try one out a see how you like it?  I'm guessing, from your avatar, that you are no stranger to a wrench.  Anyone who can keep a ride like that going is not going to be flummoxed by something as simple as swapping out a shaft in a golf club.

  • Thumbs Up 1

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 hours ago, Piz said:

I'm of the mind that if you really like a particular club there is no reason to abandon it entirely.  Why toss away all the years spent together, in triumph and tragedy, for what is, at best, a suspicion?  Re-shafting isn't difficult and doesn't require a boat load of expensive tools.  Why not try one out a see how you like it?  I'm guessing, from your avatar, that you are no stranger to a wrench.  Anyone who can keep a ride like that going is not going to be flummoxed by something as simple as swapping out a shaft in a golf club.

Yes to this and yes to re-shafting. I re-shafted one set of Mizunos with the Nippon shafts. Great! Hard to beat the Nippon shafts for consistency, I'm told. Have a great week all! -Marv

DRIVER: Cleveland 588 Altitude ( Matrix Radix Sv Graphite, A) IRONS: Mizuno JPX-800 HD Irons & 3,4,5 JPX Fli-Hi (Grafalloy Prolaunch Blue Graphite, R); WEDGES: (Carried as needed) Artisan Golf 46, 50, 53, 56 low bounce, 56 high bounce; PUTTER: Mizuno TP Mills 9

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thanks for the opinions guys, reshaft it is. The MP33 are the clubs I played with up until I had to quit playing 6 years ago due to a spinal cord injury I am now just getting back to chunking balls. The DG300 are just to heavy for me now, I'm 66 plus the injury just spells SLOW !!  I'm going to reshaft and regrip the 33's , I have a new set of AP1 with the steelfiber i80 to fall back on (don't really like that big O'l head)...

THANKS AGAIN GUYS !!


Posted

I got a set of basically new set Callaway X20 Tours from C-PreOwned in 2011. They came with PX 5.0 shafts, which someone told me were R-flex. Well, in Project X reality these were the firmest R-flex shafts in the universe.

Except on really good days I had trouble getting through the ball. I reshafted with NS Pro 8950GH in R.flex - 17 grams lighter and a half-flex softer comparatively.

The NS Pro 950 is similar to the 8950, but the 950 launches a bit lower.

The NS Pros really helped out my swing. I'm 67, and have rotation problems due to an arthritic right hip. The lighter shafts put less strain on the body.

I might suggest you try the Recoil shafts. A Recoil 95 in R-flex are a solid graphite shaft which might put less overall strain on your body. Our oldest club pro uses the Recoil 95 in S-flex. If you get a chance, try a Recoil 95 side-by-side with the Steelfiber i80 just for comparison purposes.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

WUTiger thanks for that info. I had my 5 iron reshafted in the 950 and felt great, hit the ball HIGH , don't feel like I need it any higher. I live in part of the country that is boondocs USA.  There are no club fitters so testing the Recoil shaft is about impossible . I do thank you for your feedback ...


Posted
2 hours ago, Gunsmoke said:

I live in part of the country that is boondocs USA.  There are no club fitters so testing the Recoil shaft is about impossible .

I'm embarrassed I didn't notice your Guymon, OK locator at first!

Back in 1982 I lived in Enid, and played in a scramble at Oakwood CC with a club pro from Guymon (his name escapes me). I also lived in Guthrie, and twice in Lawton before coming back to St. Louis area.

  • Upvote 1

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, Gunsmoke said:

Thanks for the opinions guys, reshaft it is. The MP33 are the clubs I played with up until I had to quit playing 6 years ago due to a spinal cord injury I am now just getting back to chunking balls. The DG300 are just to heavy for me now, I'm 66 plus the injury just spells SLOW !!  I'm going to reshaft and regrip the 33's , I have a new set of AP1 with the steelfiber i80 to fall back on (don't really like that big O'l head)...

THANKS AGAIN GUYS !!

Ask the clubmaker to tipweight them/use tungsten power in the adhesive, or just use lead tape on the back of the blade for balance/feel the clubhead. I played them in their day and it was an easier blade with a longer heel to toe.

The Recoil 95's are a good shaft. I do suggest graphite for the more mature player - saves the body. Depends on how much launch you need or want. The 950's are fairly soft to flex, or once were when I was younger. I now use 78g graphite and they are easier to launch. The Recoil also come in lighter weights - I'd look at the lighter weights with blades, and find someone to balance the clubs. The Recoils have more feel than Aerotechs. I still have a set wtih Aerotech i80s.

Edited by Mr. Desmond

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thanks for the reply Mr Desmond, I will try the tape , if I ever get the clubs back. They are sure taking their time. T have a new set of AP1 with the Aerotech i80 shaft which I really like the feel of , I'm not real fond of the AP1 Just to much metal to look at..

 


Posted
20 hours ago, Gunsmoke said:

Thanks for the reply Mr Desmond, I will try the tape , if I ever get the clubs back. They are sure taking their time. T have a new set of AP1 with the Aerotech i80 shaft which I really like the feel of , I'm not real fond of the AP1 Just to much metal to look at..

 

Agree on the original and second version of AP1s - the new ones might be better, but I haven't purchased Titleist Irons since the 962 (?) - late 90's small cavity.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2854 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.