Jump to content
IGNORED

Tree Removal at Classic Courses


Note: This thread is 2055 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

This is just a personal preference and not how I think all courses should be. I like a lot of trees or least enough to make an errant shot costly (not necessarily a lost ball). I also find courses with a lot of trees aesthetically pleasing and more enjoyable to play than those with fewer trees.

I don't disagree with keeping the original design or any of the other benefits for removing trees.

Jon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
16 hours ago, JonMA1 said:

I like a lot of trees or least enough to make an errant shot costly (not necessarily a lost ball).

What makes you think hitting a ball into the rough is not "costly" at many of these courses with less trees?

Often, a shot into the trees is less costly than a shot into the rough (or fescue) on a course with few trees. The grass is thinner under trees.

16 hours ago, JonMA1 said:

I also find courses with a lot of trees aesthetically pleasing and more enjoyable to play than those with fewer trees.

Yeah, nobody likes sweeping vistas where you can see seven, eight, nine holes all from one location. 😛

Teasing a bit, but… not entirely. I just think maybe you haven't played the right courses.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, iacas said:

What makes you think hitting a ball into the rough is not "costly" at many of these courses with less trees?

Often, a shot into the trees is less costly than a shot into the rough (or fescue) on a course with few trees. The grass is thinner under trees.

The courses I play have both trees and fescue/heather and rough.;-)

Never said or meant to imply courses with less trees were without hazards or less difficult. Two different kinds of trouble.

1 hour ago, iacas said:

Yeah, nobody likes sweeping vistas where you can see seven, eight, nine holes all from one location. 😛

 Teasing a bit, but… not entirely.

:beer:

In all fairness, I was clear it was a personal preference.

1 hour ago, iacas said:

I just think maybe you haven't played the right courses.

You are probably correct, but we will likely never know.

I have played this course which is considered one of the more beautiful courses in the country. And yes, it was beautiful to look at... so long as I wasn't playing golf. After the first few holes it became underwhelming. Well-maintained and as challenging as other courses, but to me, boring to play.

Jon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2055 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...