Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2720 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Anyone else still playing this club?  Having recently upgraded from its counterpart driver and seeing appreciable improvement in both distance and forgiveness, it has me wondering about my 3 wood. have there been advances in 3 wood design that compare with driver changes?  I hit my 3 wood pretty well and can usually rely on it getting 200-220 yards, and a fairly reliable flightpath. It does have a stiff Graphalloy shaft that is probably not correct for my swing speed - not sure if that's a big deal?

Callaway Razr-Fit 8.5 Driver | Callaway GBB Warbird 3W | PingEye 2 Irons (2-PW) | McGregor Jack Nicklaus SW | Ping B61 Putter


  • Moderator
Posted

Short answer is yes, technology has improved in fairway woods as well. You should go demo some and compare with what you have. 

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

In my opinion, the advances in fairway wood technology don't compare to the advances in drivers.  Have fairway woods improved since the GBB was released in '95?  Of course.  But drivers are what get the lion's share of R&D money because it's one of the main clubs in just about everyone's bag...they hit the ball long, they are usually the most expensive single club, they are used on most holes and to a large percentage of players it's a sexy club.  Fairway woods not so much.

But, anyone who has played golf seriously for a significant amount of time knows a good 3 wood is the hardest club to find.  When you finally get a good one, lock it in.  My current 3 wood has been in the bag about 19 years.  I'll replace it if the head cracks or it gets stolen, but otherwise I have never considered getting a new one.

You mentioned in your post that you typically hit your 3 wood good most of the time, you have confidence in it, and it has a consistent trajectory.  Here is my rule-of-thumb...never jack with a club you are hitting well.  This applies to any club.  I have seen it too many times.  A guy has a club he hits good 90% of the time, and he'll want to reshaft it or trade it in on a different one to try to make it better.  I look at it like this...there is a 10% chance a new club or modifying the old one will be an improvement.  There is a 90% chance of making things worse.  Consider replacing a club or making changes to it are when you don't hit it well or can't hit it consistently.  I have nothing against getting new gear...there is nothing more fun than acquiring new clubs.  Many people do it for no reason...they just feel like it.  I don't have a problem with that.  But you are looking to make a change hoping for better performance.  Based on the information you provided, I would recommend hanging onto your current 3 wood.  Never mess with a club you hit good!

Bridgestone j40 445 w/ Graphite Design AD DJ-7
Callaway Steelhead Plus 3 wood w/ RCH Pro Series 3.2
Adams Idea Pro hybrids (3 & 4) w/ Aldila VS Proto 
Bridgestone j33 CB (5-PW) w/ original Rifle 5.5
Bridgestone West Coast 52*, j40 satin 56* & 60* w/ DG S-300
Odyssey White Hot XG #9
Bridgestone B330-RX

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On ‎6‎/‎24‎/‎2018 at 1:31 PM, 1badbadger said:

In my opinion, the advances in fairway wood technology don't compare to the advances in drivers.  Have fairway woods improved since the GBB was released in '95?  Of course.  But drivers are what get the lion's share of R&D money because it's one of the main clubs in just about everyone's bag...they hit the ball long, they are usually the most expensive single club, they are used on most holes and to a large percentage of players it's a sexy club.  Fairway woods not so much.

But, anyone who has played golf seriously for a significant amount of time knows a good 3 wood is the hardest club to find.  When you finally get a good one, lock it in.  My current 3 wood has been in the bag about 19 years.  I'll replace it if the head cracks or it gets stolen, but otherwise I have never considered getting a new one.

You mentioned in your post that you typically hit your 3 wood good most of the time, you have confidence in it, and it has a consistent trajectory.  Here is my rule-of-thumb...never jack with a club you are hitting well.  This applies to any club.  I have seen it too many times.  A guy has a club he hits good 90% of the time, and he'll want to reshaft it or trade it in on a different one to try to make it better.  I look at it like this...there is a 10% chance a new club or modifying the old one will be an improvement.  There is a 90% chance of making things worse.  Consider replacing a club or making changes to it are when you don't hit it well or can't hit it consistently.  I have nothing against getting new gear...there is nothing more fun than acquiring new clubs.  Many people do it for no reason...they just feel like it.  I don't have a problem with that.  But you are looking to make a change hoping for better performance.  Based on the information you provided, I would recommend hanging onto your current 3 wood.  Never mess with a club you hit good!

That sound you heard was the air leaving my balloon :-$. Good put, and that same thought has crossed my mind. The changes in driver technology are quite obvious - visually for starters.  I certainly wouldn't get rid of the current 3 wood until any switch has me never looking back but just wondering if, like my positive driver change results, I'm not taking advantage of technology. 

Callaway Razr-Fit 8.5 Driver | Callaway GBB Warbird 3W | PingEye 2 Irons (2-PW) | McGregor Jack Nicklaus SW | Ping B61 Putter


Posted
4 hours ago, fishgolf said:

That sound you heard was the air leaving my balloon :-$. Good put, and that same thought has crossed my mind. The changes in driver technology are quite obvious - visually for starters.  I certainly wouldn't get rid of the current 3 wood until any switch has me never looking back but just wondering if, like my positive driver change results, I'm not taking advantage of technology. 

Aw Dude...I'm sorry!  I didn't mean kill your buzz.  

Bridgestone j40 445 w/ Graphite Design AD DJ-7
Callaway Steelhead Plus 3 wood w/ RCH Pro Series 3.2
Adams Idea Pro hybrids (3 & 4) w/ Aldila VS Proto 
Bridgestone j33 CB (5-PW) w/ original Rifle 5.5
Bridgestone West Coast 52*, j40 satin 56* & 60* w/ DG S-300
Odyssey White Hot XG #9
Bridgestone B330-RX

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2720 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.