Jump to content
IGNORED

Official Tiger Car Crash/Infidelity Thread


groovezilla79
Note: This thread is 5053 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Which would make him not a good guy...

I don't agree. Cheating on your wife is never ok, but sex addiction (only speculating here given the number of infidelities) is a serious problem. I don't think that one vice, no matter the size or scope,

automatically makes you an entirely bad person. But the man clearly needs help. No doubt about that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Biologically every healthy male is a sex addict, the question is whether he deals with it in a culturally appropriate way. Tiger has essentially created his own world and therefore created his own cultural norms. I am sorry his wife was not on board with his norms, she should be, she agreed to live in his world.
I hope his staff bag has a huge TW on it and he never negotiates another endorsement, all he needs to advertise is his foundation.
(to the strain of the closing scene of SHANE)
Tiger, Tiger, come back Tiger.

Current Bag
Ogio Synchro cart
'07 Burner Driver, 3 Fairway, and Rescue 5
Early Titelist Cavities
200 56, Spin milled 60 , Rossa  Suzuka

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Biologically every healthy male is a sex addict, the question is whether he deals with it in a culturally appropriate way. Tiger has essentially created his own world and therefore created his own cultural norms. I am sorry his wife was not on board with his norms, she should be, she agreed to live in his world.

Ridiculous.

He has not created his norms. He's lied about them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Ridiculous.

concur. i would go further by asserting that even TW himself would find that ridiculous.:)

on his foundation,,,it is a shame that small kids have to learn life lessons from tiger this way. a real shame. his foundation is not about golf, mind you. it is about teaching kids to be better citizens, to take responsibility, to have integrity.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Absurd as it sounds (and I agree entirely with the above two posts), yes, there is a sense in which there is truth to the remark. There is indeed a "cultural norm" in some people's minds in this country that finds a 50% divorce rate - or whatever it is exactly - quite acceptable really (though they'll never admit to it), with the attendant effects on children and broader society. Someone remind me again of the median longevity of the american marriage? I could look it up but why bother - somewhere around 7 years IIRC. Behavior like that of TW is a very big part of the problem - let's not be coy about this, great ballplayer that he is.

Let's just say that there are some "cultural norms" (in the minds of many people) that need to be publicly criticized - this being one of them. What kind of a society do people wish inhabit anyway? [rhetorical]

TW made a fortune in part by pretending that he was an exemplar of our cultural norms. Now we know better. Go cry a river.

Driver: Cobra 460SZ 9.0, med.
3 Wood: Taylor stiff
3-hybrid: Nike 18 deg stiff
4-hybrid:
Taylor RBZ 22 deg regular
Irons:5-9, Mizuno MP30, steel
Wedges: PW, 52, 56, 60 Mizuno MP30
Putter: Odyssey 2-ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
TW made a fortune in part by pretending that he was an exemplar of our cultural norms.

Uh, no. He made a fortune because he was/is arguably the best athlete in the world.

If you assumed he was a great guy off the golf course that's your own dumb fault. He's not even a "great guy" ON the golf course. He's a great golfer and athlete.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Uh, no. He made a fortune because he was/is arguably the best athlete in the world.

the majority of his net worth has come from endorsements, not from golf earnings. prior to the car wreck saga and the revelation thereafter, tiger's image has been what advertisers would die for: multicultural/global appeal, competitive/talented, family value with kids and wife, role model for kids with foundation, etc. the wholesome package is made of those 4 items and now he is missing the latter 2, if not 3.

tiger owed the corporate world for getting where he has been despite his god like golf skills. the other side of the coin is that the corporate world does not owe anything to tiger. when the potato gets too hot, they simply drop you. he can return and continue to be the best golfer, but i suspect the corporate world, those aiming for broader appeals, will find this recent saga hard to forget. the rehab will take a long time, if not forever as far as getting the corporate world on his side again.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


he can return and continue to be the best golfer, but i suspect the corporate world, those aiming for broader appeals, will find this recent saga hard to forget. the rehab will take a long time, if not forever as far as getting the corporate world on his side again.

The primary reason for those sposors endorsing any athlete is to associate themselves with a winner/champion/great performance. That way, when you see their ads with that particular athlete, you subconciously think that company is great. When Tiger wins again, be it this year or next, or whatever, the sponsors will be back.

 
Follow me on Twitter - TST_Justin
 -  -  - 
 
This Week's Bag Drop - Miura Passing Point 9003 Forged Irons and Adams Idea Pro a12 Irons and Hybrids  - Sweet new forged cavity backs from Miura (do they make any irons that arent simply beautiful?) and irons/hybrids from Adams created with...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
the majority of his net worth has come from endorsements, not from golf earnings.

I never said he got most of his money from golf earnings. I said he got his endorsements because he's good at golf. Big difference.

prior to the car wreck saga and the revelation thereafter, tiger's image has been what advertisers would die for: multicultural/global appeal, competitive/talented, family value with kids and wife, role model for kids with foundation, etc. the wholesome package is made of those 4 items and now he is missing the latter 2, if not 3.

Have you ever been responsible for signing an athlete to a $10M deal? Suffice to say you're guessing at what they were paying for or what they expected.

I think they paid Tiger because he kicked ass at golf. He was understood to have tremendous focus, will-power, and ability on the golf course. Tiger signed huge contracts when he was unmarried. He signed huge contracts when he was effectively a college drop-out. He's continued to sign the contracts as he's gotten married, had kids, etc. In all these ads, his family has been featured in exactly zero so far as I can tell. He is shown alone - almost always portrayed as a golfer - in the advertisements. Also, the companies he's represented aren't exactly "family brands." They're male brands that utilize Tiger as a kick-ass golfer. The people who chose to endorse Tiger did so because he was a dominant athlete. That's it. Again, if you wanted to assume he was a great guy because he won a lot of golf tournaments, that's your mistake.
tiger owed the corporate world for getting where he has been despite his god like golf skills.

What? Tiger got to where he is - and became such a valuable guy to have in marketing campaigns - because of his golf skills. There's no "despite" here and there's no "owing" the "corporate world."

The primary reason for those sposors endorsing any athlete is to associate themselves with a winner/champion/great performance. That way, when you see their ads with that particular athlete, you subconciously think that company is great. When Tiger wins again, be it this year or next, or whatever, the sponsors will be back.

Yeah. Tiger = great athlete. The only reason a few companies have put a hold on their Tiger ads or dropped him is because, currently, people don't think "kick-ass golfer" when they see Tiger. They don't think "athlete."

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The primary reason for those sposors endorsing any athlete is to associate themselves with a winner/champion/great performance. That way, when you see their ads with that particular athlete, you subconciously think that company is great. When Tiger wins again, be it this year or next, or whatever, the sponsors will be back.

never say never. there is always a possibility. if i have 100 dollars to bet, i would put 99 dollars on "things won't be the same again" and donate the one dolla to kids lead astray by tiger

i define kids lead astray as those kid who think if you are good in sports, you can be all you can be. america loves underdogs and comeback stories. but tiger is no rocky. what he did has zero redeeming value. at least half of the world population, aka, the females, barring night club hostesses, find his actions disgusting. can good golf save the day? i don't think tiger is sure, but yes, yes, yes in the hearts of die hard golf fans!
Link to comment
Share on other sites


never say never. there is always a possibility. if i have 100 dollars to bet, i would put 99 dollars on "things won't be the same again" and donate the one dolla to kids lead astray by tiger

If you had a spare $100, you'd gamble $99 and give $1 to a non-existent charity. Neat.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


the majority of his net worth has come from endorsements, not from golf earnings. prior to the car wreck saga and the revelation thereafter, tiger's image has been what advertisers would die for: multicultural/global appeal, competitive/talented, family value with kids and wife, role model for kids with foundation, etc. the wholesome package is made of those 4 items and now he is missing the latter 2, if not 3.

Tigers image is what advertisers would die for because his image is that of a winner, a champion....because he kicks ass in his arena.

If you say it's based on his persona....of which was one of a very private person....then that makes no sense. Michael Jordan didn't get his endorsements based on anything other than being the best in basketball... Wayne Gretzky in hockey....Bo Jackson for a very short time in Football and now Peyton Manning. Once Jordan went to baseball.....he didn't retain all of his endorsement deals. Why? Because he wasn't the best at anything any longer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Tigers image is what advertisers would die for because his image is that of a winner, a champion....because he kicks ass in his arena.

i have no argument with your logic, except here is my question, to go further on this...

assuming tiger comes out playing soon and starts winning again, and, at the same time, he continues to develop more personal and embarassing issues that he cannot openly discuss, you still think, based on the reasoning that he kicks ass in his arena and have his ass kicked in his personal life, that advertisers would flock back?
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
at least half of the world population, aka, the females, barring night club hostesses, find his actions disgusting.

So what? Women weren't the targets of any of his advertisements.

Tiger was highly paid as an endorser because he was a great athlete. That's it.
and now Peyton Manning.

That's a good example. There are rumors that he's quite a man about town and is into hookers and things too, but he's paid as an endorser because people think "good football player" when they see him.

Jordan, Bo Jackson, also good examples. Look, golfdad and Chas can do everything within their power to pretend it's fact that the advertisers or Tiger were pushing some "family man" type image, but neither history nor common sense support that argument at all.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So what? Women weren't the targets of any of his advertisements.

since i have never signed any athletes to any dollar amt, you would have excuse me for not being able to validate the assertion that only men are the targets of tiger's ads (cars, phone service, beverage, etc)

and, i don't underestand how can manning be compared with tiger, to use the manning template to try to contain the issues confronting tiger. different scales, people.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


i have no argument with your logic, except here is my question, to go further on this...

I made no mention of his advertisers flocking back. Do I think every single one of them will? No. Do I care? Nope.

I saw your post, the quoted portion made no sense to me so I commented on it. Simple as that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
you would have excuse me for not being able to validate the assertion that only men are the targets of tiger's ads (cars, phone service, beverage, etc)

Strikes me as common sense. Men are the targets for golf clubs, razor blades, business consulting, athletic beverages...

Women are in the target market for "AT&T;" and Tag Heuer, but that's company-wide. They're not in the target market for the advertisements/endorsements which featured Tiger. Look at the time slots when Tiger ads ran. Almost all during times when men would be watching. Has there ever been a Tiger ad on Lifetime or Oxygen? Tiger's ads targeted men and played on the fact that he's a dominant athlete.
and, i don't underestand how can manning be compared with tiger, to use the manning template to try to contain the issues confronting tiger. different scales, people.

Peyton is a great example of a guy being paid as an athlete and nothing more. He's one of the highest paid athletes off-the-field today, making the scales rather comparable, despite your proclamations of the opposite.

And here's another variation of what I've been saying :

Source: URL Above Bamberger: Tiger is the best human interest story that golf's ever had. The guy who can explain Tiger's dominance will make you forget all about the Little Red Book. He did his best to make himself look uninteresting, but his scorecards proved otherwise. People keep saying, "Oh, he made all this money in endorsements trading on his reputation as a family man." It's almost funny. He made his money, all of it, on his greatness. As an athlete.

Again, Tiger's been paid because he's a good athlete. I for one hope he gets back to being an "athlete" sooner rather than later. I still don't care about his personal life. I don't care if he's divorced or married. I don't care what products he endorses. I just like to see him play good golf and, perhaps, to witness history when/if he breaks records.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

since i have never signed any athletes to any dollar amt, you would have excuse me for not being able to validate the assertion that only men are the targets of tiger's ads (cars, phone service, beverage, etc)

The comparison is that their endorsement deals are only because of what they do as an athelete...not what they do outside of their profession. Their lives outside of their profession can obviously effect these deals but you'd made the assertion that these deals that Tiger had were based on more than what he has done as an athelete....and you continue to put spin on it.

A lot of his deals came well before the family....so in reality, if your equation is true (multicultural/global appeal + competitive/talented + family value with kids and wife + role model for kids with foundation = endorsement contracts)....his deals were based off of 3 of your 4 components and is now missing....one?
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5053 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I kind of figured that might be part of the problem. I’m still guilty of it myself at times and you’re a better ballstriker than I am. I imagine the temptation to go for the flag grows as you get more control over your wedges. Might want to think about shot selection, too. I don’t know how you typically play short game shots but I see a lot of people default to hitting high pitch shots from basically everywhere, to every hole location, without regard for how the green is contoured and how the ball might release depending on where it lands. I know my short game has been steadily improving from expanding my shot selection, overall. Though to be honest, part of that is from necessity because I was really struggling with pitch shots so I started hitting more chips from everywhere, but it taught me a lot more about how to play short game shots in general. NP man. We’re all learning and improving together. It is a really good tool.
    • 2 rounds this weekend, one at my home course and another course that I know well.   Played well for 3 of the 4 nines.    Ended up with an 80 and an 88.  Breaking it down by 9, it was 38, 42, 41, and a tough 47 where I somehow ended up with chipping/pitching shanks where I dropped at least 6 strokes on the last 6 holes.
    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It is almost six years old, though perhaps modified since then. It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice. As long as I frequently hit balls on the range or course, I'll get feedback on any changes there.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...