Followers 0

# Reconciling moving tee markers with handicap scoring

## 13 posts in this topic

I am a relative newbie to the game so apologies if this is a basic question/s. I searched for clues on it but could not find much info.

When entering your score into a handicap system, you need to also specify the tees that were used (back, middle, or front). The slope/rating for each is different and therefore has an impact. As an example,  a par-3 hole distance for the middle-tees is listed on the scorecard as 207. The distance for the back tees on that same hole is listed as 233. I believe that these distances are measured from the ‘plates’ in the tee area ground to the ‘center’ of the green (generally speaking)?

So when the tee markers are moved around and not aligned with the ‘plates’, is that so they will derive the same expected distance (for the given tees) based on flag/hole location movement? So in other words using the example above, would the distance between the middle tees and the flag be 207 and the back tees and the flag be 233? Yesterday I played a course where on several holes the middle and back tee markers were together. That would seem to contradict the above assumption. Also, if the middle/back are teeing off from same spot, then how is this reflected when entering the score (per above). The total distance difference between middle and back tees (according to the score card) is supposed to be ~600 yards…?

Thanks in advance for feedback on this..

0

##### Share on other sites

I am a relative newbie to the game so apologies if this is a basic question/s. I searched for clues on it but could not find much info.

When entering your score into a handicap system, you need to also specify the tees that were used (back, middle, or front). The slope/rating for each is different and therefore has an impact. As an example,  a par-3 hole distance for the middle-tees is listed on the scorecard as 207. The distance for the back tees on that same hole is listed as 233. I believe that these distances are measured from the ‘plates’ in the tee area ground to the ‘center’ of the green (generally speaking)?

So when the tee markers are moved around and not aligned with the ‘plates’, is that so they will derive the same expected distance (for the given tees) based on flag/hole location movement? So in other words using the example above, would the distance between the middle tees and the flag be 207 and the back tees and the flag be 233? Yesterday I played a course where on several holes the middle and back tee markers were together. That would seem to contradict the above assumption. Also, if the middle/back are teeing off from same spot, then how is this reflected when entering the score (per above). The total distance difference between middle and back tees (according to the score card) is supposed to be ~600 yards…?

Thanks in advance for feedback on this..

A "properly" set up course keeps approximately the same total yardage as stated on the card for each set.  Sometimes that means lengthening one hole to compensate for shortening another one.  My home course does it as recommended - that is, they move the tee up in the box when the hole is cut toward the back of the green, and the move the tee back when the hole is front.

Some variability is irrelevant, since 100 or so yards plus or minus from the card yardage won't change the rating.

0

##### Share on other sites

Yeah usually close to card yardage and typically staggered. Pretty much a necessity to keep the boxes in decent condition. However I have seen a few courses that were really far off. A popular course here usually plays quite a bit shorter than card yardage and I have no doubt it's and deliberate attempt to speed up the pace of play.

0

##### Share on other sites

Yeah usually close to card yardage and typically staggered. Pretty much a necessity to keep the boxes in decent condition. However I have seen a few courses that were really far off. A popular course here usually plays quite a bit shorter than card yardage and I have no doubt it's and deliberate attempt to speed up the pace of play.

Not only to speed play, but also to fool the players into thinking that they are playing the full length rather than being honest and publicizing what they are doing.  I've known a few courses which don't seem to care what the card says, they just set the course up with no plan.

0

##### Share on other sites

Not only to speed play, but also to fool the players into thinking that they are playing the full length rather than being honest and publicizing what they are doing.  I've known a few courses which don't seem to care what the card says, they just set the course up with no plan.

Riverdale was honest about it when I asked. They had the gold tee markers pulled with "tee closed" signs on the boxes. Both the whites and blues were significantly shorter than card yardage. Slow play can be a problem there. It's the closest course to me and I rarely go. Shame because it's a cool course.

0

##### Share on other sites

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fourputt

Not only to speed play, but also to fool the players into thinking that they are playing the full length rather than being honest and publicizing what they are doing.  I've known a few courses which don't seem to care what the card says, they just set the course up with no plan.

Riverdale was honest about it when I asked. They had the gold tee markers pulled with "tee closed" signs on the boxes. Both the whites and blues were significantly shorter than card yardage. Slow play can be a problem there. It's the closest course to me and I rarely go. Shame because it's a cool course.

Yes it's a nice one.  I played it at least once almost every year from the year it opened.  I have a good friend who designed and made the sign for the Dunes course, and part of the deal he worked for payment was a break on green fees for several years.  We generally went together once a year - from unincorporated south Jeffco to the Adams County Fairgrounds is an hour drive on a good day, so I didn't do it often.

0

##### Share on other sites

A "properly" set up course keeps approximately the same total yardage as stated on the card for each set.  Sometimes that means lengthening one hole to compensate for shortening another one.  My home course does it as recommended - that is, they move the tee up in the box when the hole is cut toward the back of the green, and the move the tee back when the hole is front.

Some variability is irrelevant, since 100 or so yards plus or minus from the card yardage won't change the rating.

Thanks for your response. If I am following correctly, the "total" yardage when it is all said and done should be fairly close to the total on the scorecard (for those tees). Regardless if on several holes there is no distance difference between middle and back tees (tee markers together for those holes).

It sounds like my other assumption that the "207" distance or "233" distance are maintained may not be necessarily true though. In other words the distance number on the scorecard does not equate to the distance between the tee-marker and the flag?

0

##### Share on other sites

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fourputt

A "properly" set up course keeps approximately the same total yardage as stated on the card for each set.  Sometimes that means lengthening one hole to compensate for shortening another one.  My home course does it as recommended - that is, they move the tee up in the box when the hole is cut toward the back of the green, and the move the tee back when the hole is front.

Some variability is irrelevant, since 100 or so yards plus or minus from the card yardage won't change the rating.

Thanks for your response. If I am following correctly, the "total" yardage when it is all said and done should be fairly close to the total on the scorecard (for those tees). Regardless if on several holes there is no distance difference between middle and back tees (tee markers together for those holes).

It sounds like my other assumption that the "207" distance or "233" distance are maintained may not be necessarily true though. In other words the distance number on the scorecard does not equate to the distance between the tee-marker and the flag?

There is certainly no Rule that would make such a thing necessary, but that would be a course I wouldn't play again if I didn't like how they were setting it up.  If they are truly messing with the course to the extent that the rating is going to invalid and your handicap will be adversely affected, then then I'd ask if there was an unpublished rating for way the course was set up.  If not then I wouldn't return a score if I thought that it would impact my handicap.

I can't imagine having to play a course which set up a par 3 hole at 233 yards when I planned my round based on the card telling me that the longest par 3 was 207.  For me, 207 would be the longest I'd consider, and I'd be more than a bit upset to find that they had gotten that free with the setup.

0

##### Share on other sites

My home course does it as recommended - that is, they move the tee up in the box when the hole is cut toward the back of the green, and the move the tee back when the hole is front.

Hmmm, I think if I played one course often, I'd hope they would go against this recommendation and be more creative.  I get that they have to keep the overall yardage the same, but I'd prefer more variation in the individual holes.  It would be OK if they occasionally made that Par 3 play 250, and other days 175.  On those respective days the following par 5 that says 520 on the card can be 470 and then 560.

0

##### Share on other sites

The course he's talking about is older without enough room to accommodate a 75 yard change. At least that is the way it was when I was there years ago. Here some of the new courses have as many 5-6 tees with combo ratings for those wanting to mix it up. But they typically don't vary hole lengths that much. The span at our course is 10-15 yards of the plaques at the most. But they don't move the markers up if the hole is cut back and vice versa, it appears random with regard to length and just an effort to allow tee boxes to heal. The markers are always on the same box.

0

##### Share on other sites

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fourputt

My home course does it as recommended - that is, they move the tee up in the box when the hole is cut toward the back of the green, and the move the tee back when the hole is front.

Hmmm, I think if I played one course often, I'd hope they would go against this recommendation and be more creative.  I get that they have to keep the overall yardage the same, but I'd prefer more variation in the individual holes.  It would be OK if they occasionally made that Par 3 play 250, and other days 175.  On those respective days the following par 5 that says 520 on the card can be 470 and then 560.

If I ever saw a 250 yard par 3 I'd never play that course again. That said, I'm also not interested in a 250 yard par 4.  For me, a course has a lot more than just length to make it fun to play.

I played the same course as my home course (not exclusively) for nearly 30 years, but I never played 2 rounds that I could identify as being very similar.  I watched the course grow from a muni built on a tight budget in 1972 (I first played there in 1975) to a really pleasant parkland course that gives players good variety with reasonable playability.  The greens offer a decent challenge without being convoluted.  Bunkers are well placed but also aren't a dominant feature on the course.  Trees are situated where they will confound the errant shot but the course is not cut out of the primeval forest (this was once just high prairie).  Water is in play on 8 holes, but it won't bring on an attack of hydrophobia.  Holes play to just about every point on the compass, so you get wind from all directions during a round.  This is the layout from Google Earth.

0

##### Share on other sites

As others have indicated, the reality is that the total course length needs to be close to the rated length - the length of individual holes can and should be varied to create a course at the rated length.  Most courses have a front, center and back rotation of hole locations on greens - the average of front, center, back is center, so the hole locations for the day is irrelevant for the yardage, the difference can only originate from the tee locations versus the "plates", the starting measuring point.  The course should be set up so that the distance from tee markers to plates is close to zero.  This means that you can be shorter ( a minus number) on several holes but would need to longer (a positive number) on several holes to make the total of plus and minus close to zero.

0

##### Share on other sites

As others have indicated, the reality is that the total course length needs to be close to the rated length - the length of individual holes can and should be varied to create a course at the rated length.  Most courses have a front, center and back rotation of hole locations on greens - the average of front, center, back is center, so the hole locations for the day is irrelevant for the yardage, the difference can only originate from the tee locations versus the "plates", the starting measuring point.  The course should be set up so that the distance from tee markers to plates is close to zero.  This means that you can be shorter ( a minus number) on several holes but would need to longer (a positive number) on several holes to make the total of plus and minus close to zero.

Thanks again for clarifying this. I guess one of may takeaways from this is not to pay TOO much attention to the listed scorecard distance for individual holes. It's only a starting reference point. I played at a course today that had special signs on many of the tees with exact tee-to-flag distances listed for each tee (as they were set up today). Have not seen that before. Since I don't use a range finder, this was helpful to know..

0

## Create an account

Register a new account

Followers 0

• ### Topics Being Discussed Right Now on The Sand Trap

By mvmac, in Golf Talk

• 244 replies
• 8,750 views
• #### What would a PGA Tour player shoot at your home course?

By dove694, in Golf Talk

• 125 replies
• 2,118 views
• #### Standing on Tee Marker for Aiding a Swing

By sirhacksalot, in Rules of Golf

• 31 replies
• 369 views
• #### Your worst golf bargain

By bkuehn1952, in Golf Talk

• 8 replies
• 121 views
• #### My Swing (PumaAttack)

By pumaAttack, in Member Swings

• 107 replies
• 2,980 views

• Want to join this community?

We'd love to have you!

• ## 2016 TST Partners

• ### Posts

Handicap card completed - Off a 23 which is a bit higher than I'd like, Going to play in my first comp next month hopefully. Still working on those blow up holes. Shot an 86 yesterday which is my best round in a long time!
• What would a PGA Tour player shoot at your home course?
@iacas Not sure why you feel the need to try and make people feel stupid? What's the attitude all about?

Because you seem to think that nobody else has any valid arguments, I felt compelled to contact a friend of mine and ask him about the subject. He has won twice on the MacKenzie Tour, 4 times on the Gateway Tour and played in the US Open in 2010 at Pebble Beach. I Facebooked him a few days ago and heard back from him today. He said that his Tour buddies of that calibre typically shoot in the mid 60's (or lower) if they play an "average" course for a Pro-Am or a sponsor's event or for a casual round. He added that he played a municipal course in Phoenix last week (he didn't say which one) and shot -8 without ever having seen the course before. And he was never able to make it through the final stage of Q-School so he self-admittedly doesn't have the skillset of the PGA guys. I still say the average Tour player would shoot in the low 60's at my course. Here's the scorecard of it, and Nick Taylor's scores from the 2006 Provincial Tournament. He was only a junior at the time and hadn't played for the University of Washington yet. Safe to say his handicap has improved a little bit since then  and he still shot 68 twice and under difficult tournament conditions! No way he'd shoot that now.
Nick Taylor   Round: 4 Position: 1 Score: -11 Strokes: 277 Tip: Click on a hole number to compare Nick’s score to the field. Hole 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Out 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 In Total Yards 363 381 374 191 496 406 524 197 401 3333 530 197 424 487 559 166 393 428 286 3470 6803 Handicap 16 4 14 18 10 2 12 8 6   11 15 3 1 7 13 9 5 17     Par 4 4 4 3 5 4 5 3 4 36 5 3 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 36 72 Round 1 5 3 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 34 4 3 4 4 5 3 3 3 5 34 68 Round 2 4 3 4 3 4 3 6 3 5 35 5 3 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 36 71 Round 3 4 4 3 2 5 4 4 3 4 33 4 3 3 4 6 3 4 4 4 35 68 Round 4 4 3 4 3 5 3 5 3 4 34 5 3 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 36 70 Key:   Eagle   Birdie   Bogey   Dbl Bogey
• Standing on Tee Marker for Aiding a Swing
However, the ruling given by the RBs that, when Preferred Lies are in operation, a player may place his ball on a stray tee already in the ground, may suggest that he make take advantage of the tee marker.  A tee being defined as a device. But a tee is designed for the specific purpose of raising the ball off the ground. The tee marker is not designed to provide a footstand.
Golf can be an obsession in terms of equipment, so my worse bargain this past offseason was stock piling several boxes of Golf Balls.  I over did it ten fold...duh.
• My Swing (PumaAttack)