• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
NJpatbee

One Ball

4 posts in this topic

I understand that a tournament can declare a one ball rule, requiring the same brand and type of ball be played for the entire round.  Doing some research, I can find nothing that would stop a golfer playing without the one ball rule declared, to voluntarily change brand and/or type of ball between holes.  We all know the example of hitting the Velocity on the 440 yard par 5 and then using a Prov1x for the 135 yard par 3.  I understand replacing a ball when the rules allow (e.g. ball in water hazard) but did not realize that you can switch between holes and have a valid score for hadicap purposes.

The groups I have played games with (Nassau's, Skins, etc.) never allowed someone to replace their ball on the tee depending upon the characteristics of the hole - you basically played the ball you played until it was beat up or lost. - which apparently is wrong.  Am I misunderstanding the rule?  .

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I understand that a tournament can declare a one ball rule, requiring the same brand and type of ball be played for the entire round.  Doing some research, I can find nothing that would stop a golfer playing without the one ball rule declared, to voluntarily change brand and/or type of ball between holes.  We all know the example of hitting the Velocity on the 440 yard par 5 and then using a Prov1x for the 135 yard par 3.  I understand replacing a ball when the rules allow (e.g. ball in water hazard) but did not realize that you can switch between holes and have a valid score for hadicap purposes.

The groups I have played games with (Nassau's, Skins, etc.) never allowed someone to replace their ball on the tee depending upon the characteristics of the hole - you basically played the ball you played until it was beat up or lost. - which apparently is wrong.  Am I misunderstanding the rule?  .

You are basically correct.  If the committee has not instituted the one ball condition then the player may do as he likes between holes as long as the chosen ball is a conforming ball.  In fact, if the player is proceding under a rule which allows him to substitute a ball (Rule 5-3 - ball unfit for play, Rule 26 - water hazards, or Rule 27 - Ball lost or out of bounds, or Rule 28 - Ball unplayable), then he may even change brands at that time.  There is no requirement that a provisional ball be the same as the original ball played.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the 'one ball' condition is not in force you may change to a different ball (type etc) on each hole.

I addition, if you lose a ball or is is damaged and unplayable, ie whenever the rules permit you to substitute a ball, again you may change to a different type/model.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the clarifications.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • How do I organize a charity tournament to be a raging success?
      26 and a stroke? Holy smokes. Very sorry to hear that.  I have no idea how to organize a tournament but I have played in my share. The best ones are scrambles where you can organize your own team. The outcome has rarely ever mattered to us as long as we were well fed. Find a local restaurant (usually a bbq place) that wants to help you out and give a discount for advertising and spend your money there. Everyone will love to come for a good meal. Some nice prizes and maybe a raffle with some local companies offering you something if you are able to convince them it is worth it to give something to the cause.  Another thing I have seen work well is a silent auction at the end with donated items. I donated airline miles of which I have tons and 100,000 miles went for $205. Free gift for me and the cause got $205. 
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Haha - I get a couple of reputation points for a post and then go and have a blow up hole. Good drive, left myself 145 in down hill (8i), aimed #deadcenter, pulled 2 shots 25 yards left out of bounds, made 9 (+5) in a 9 hole round of (+11). A better way to avoid blow up holes - play stableford!
    • Donald Trump for president?
      Come on now, that's a bit uncalled for in Bernies case.  His political ideals might be way left, but he is at least honest and virtuous.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      I'll have to examine your other post closer. That's a good point to consider about the expansion to Continental Europe. Largely explains the poor showing of UK & Ireland in the 60's with many top tier European players not eligible. But considering the 200 million U.S. population base to 63 million in the U.K. & Ireland at the time, the latter did surprisingly well if population base was all that matters. IMO an established competitive golfing culture matters in producing elite players too. Those same European players excluded from Ryder Cup were always eligible for the Majors. The Ryder Cup is also a limited field event. It concentrates the 12 top players of the European Tour. From what I've read, depth of field is still stronger for the 'typical' PGA event, though some non-major Euro events are now stronger than some of the 'minor' PGA events. That is a significant change in Euro competitiveness from the 60's. To some extent that 30% drop sounds like it could be due to simply more international players occupying slots in the fields. If the period you mention covers when majors started to use OWGR for automatic qualification that has some not insignificant inherent issues in terms of strength of field. Having a guaranteed start rather than having to qualify would certainly make for an easier decision to travel to the event. But I'm not arguing against the policy decision facilitating international competition with a little points boost just trying to point out that field strength may not have been as weak in Jack's day as you seem to think. Compared to his peers, which is really the only thing I think you can do without speculative nuance I agree there's no question he's the best golfer. I'm really just arguing that standouts of their caliber (so many more wins so many more majors) than typical players among already elite fields are so rare, that I expect they both represent near the achievable human pinnacle in golf talent, which I don't think really differs within a few generations. The nuances of comparison across eras is interesting to me so I'll debate relative points, but I'm against arguments undervaluing Jack's achievements against 'weak fields'. They both faced very stiff competition.   I'm not dissing Jack. I think his achievements are amazing. I also think the same of Tiger's record. IMO winning percentage per start in the Majors is a very significant stat and Tiger has that in his favor (they are both top 10 and within ~ 2% of each other's number). That number is not the official one for Jack though, I truncated his Major starts to end at age 47, which I think is a reasonable cutoff for competitiveness. If Tiger competes as long as Jack did his major win % (up to age 47) might stay about the same, increase, or decrease (more likely), but he certainly won't match the 18 Majors if he doesn't get like 22+ more major starts between now and age 47.
    • Wedges, Bounce, and Ground Conditions
      Typically more bounce (or a "healthy" amount of bounce) helps in any condition.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. glinks
      glinks
      (43 years old)
  • Blog Entries