Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6380 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
ive been looking at wedges for close to a month now. it seems that the cleveland cg14 and the vokeys or even the taylormade tp are the best out there, but they are also upwards of $110 each. thats a litlte steep for me, especially when i dont have a job. my local Dick's has cleveland cg10s on sale for $50 each. i thought that would be a good club and great deal for me. however, ive been thinking and i really want to do some major improving this coming season, and getting pitches and chips close to the pin are my weak point. are the more expensive wedges (cg14, vokey, taylormade tp) really worth the extra cash? or would i be fine with the cg10?

In My Ozone Stand Bag:
Driver: Burner 10.5* Stiff
3 Wood: Burner 15* Stiff
Hybrid: Burner 19* Stiff
Irons: Tour Burner 4-GWWedges: CG14 54.12, 58.12Putter: SabertoothBall: TP Back Rangefinder: GX-IHome Course: http://www.strawberryridgegolfcourse.com/


Posted
in my opinion, YES, those wedges are good wedges, and i also think you'd be fine with the cg10. if its money you are worried about, have you ever considered the Sonartec or Tour Edge wedges? the Sonartecs can be bought brand new for around $30 on ebay, and Tour Edge makes some fantastic Spin Milled wedges that can be bought for anywhere between $30-$50 on ebay (brand new also). here are a few links for ya:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...MEWA:IT&ih;=017

http://cgi.ebay.com/Bazooka-JMAX-Mil...1%7C240%3A1318

http://cgi.ebay.com/NEW-SONARTEC-PRO...1%7C240%3A1318

http://cgi.ebay.com/SONARTEC-PROTO-T...1%7C240%3A1318

and ProShopWarehouse has been blowing out Sonartec T46 Milled Face-Yo Yo Groove Sand Wedges that usually end up going for around $20 (plus shipping):
http://cgi.ebay.com/NEW-SONARTEC-T46...1%7C240%3A1318

Posted
my apologies for the misspelling on the title. guess a proof read before a post would be helpful...

In My Ozone Stand Bag:
Driver: Burner 10.5* Stiff
3 Wood: Burner 15* Stiff
Hybrid: Burner 19* Stiff
Irons: Tour Burner 4-GWWedges: CG14 54.12, 58.12Putter: SabertoothBall: TP Back Rangefinder: GX-IHome Course: http://www.strawberryridgegolfcourse.com/


Posted
All of those wedges are probably worth it. The value is in the eye of the beholder though.
Many players on Cleveland's staff actually play the CG10 wedges. They could get any Cleveland wedge they want, but chooses the CG10. To me, this shows how good the wedge actually is.

In my Ogio Ozone Bag:
TM Superquad 9.5* UST Proforce 77g Stiff
15* Sonartec SS-2.5 (Pershing stiff)
19* TM Burner (stock stiff)
4-U - PING i10 White dot, +1.25 inches, ZZ65 stiff shafts55*/11* Snake Eyes Form Forged (DGS300)60*/12* Snake Eyes Form Forged (DGS300)Ping i10 1/2 MoonTitleist ProV1


Posted
CG10s loom fine unless you just want the vokey, TM etc. The only thing that could possibly make them seem bad is if you think that they are bad and cheap etc. Its all how you look at it. After all golf is 70% mental(or something like that)

In My Hank Haney IJGA Bag
Driver: FT Tour 9.5 w/ Aldila Voodoo Stiff
3 Wood: i15 15.5 w/ avixcore red stiff
Hybrids: Rescue 09 19, 22 w/ fujikara fit on stiff
Irons: 4 & 5 MP-52, 6-PW MP-58 w/ KBS Tour Stiff Wedges: MP T-10 52*, 58* w/ KBS Tour StiifPutter: Fastback 1 34 inBall: : Pro...


Posted
first off i think that yes they are worth it.

if you can get a couple of those cg10s i would jump on it right away. they had the sale at the stores near me too but they sold out.

i think the cg10s are comparable to the vokey 200 series which are my choice wedges.

Burner 9.5 '09/905R 9.5 V2 HL
906F2 15 75g NV Stiff
735 3 - PW S300
MP R 52.07, 58.12 S300
Original Karsten B60 Hoofer 2


Posted
Not sure. Just got some Vokey 200s (was treating myself!) and they're very good but I wouldn't say they were any better than a lot of older, forged wedges you can get via eBay for a fraction of the cost.

Doesn't have to be expensive to be effective. If you find something cheaper that you like the look of and works for you I'd say stick with it.

Home Course: Wollaton Park GC, Nottingham, U.K.

Ping G400, 9°, Alta CB 55S | Ping G400, 14°, Alta CB 65S | Adams Pro Dhy 18°, 21°, 24°, KBS Hybrid S | Ping S55 5-PW, TT DGS300 | Vokey 252-08, DGS200 | Vokey 256-10 (bent to 58°), DGS200 | Ping Sigma G Anser, 34" | Vice Pro Plus

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The CG10 are high quality wedges just like the other ones that you mentioned. When released the CG10's were to be included on the list of expensive wedges. One thing to keep in mind when shopping for these discount wedges, as well as any new one, is bounce. I would say if you can find the CG10 with the loft that you want and the two red dots, go for it. The red dots signify medium bounce which will probably be the most versatile. Sometimes when they are discounting these wedges they are the ones with something like 16* bounce and 56 loft. That would be too much for me! If you want more info on how bounce in wedges effect your shots I would try searching this site for past threads on bounce in wedges.

Driver: 4DX T 10.5 Evolver w/ Redboard
Hybrids: G5: 16*, 19*, 22*
Irons: Ping Eye 2 +no+ (5-PW)
Wedges: CG12: 52/10, 56/14, 60/10
Putter: C&L flowneckBall: Z-Star


Posted
You can't 'buy yourself a game'. Spend the money at the range, or a lesson, just MHO ..

Eventually, I'll get the hint and stop advertising, which is against the rules.


Posted
CG10s loom fine unless you just want the vokey, TM etc. The only thing that could possibly make them seem bad is if you think that they are bad and cheap etc. Its all how you look at it. After all golf is 70% mental(or something like that)

Titleist Man said it perfectly.

ive had both a 56* CG10 and a 56* vokey. couldnt tell the difference when hitting with them. so its all about what you think, if you see the club as being "cheap".

Note: This thread is 6380 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 37, June 10.  Today was primarily WFH, so I had several practice sessions (indoors, off a mat, into the net).  At least one each of U, 9, and 6-iron full swings with the usual priority.   I also tried a few times a putting type stroke with my 4H, as something I should probably learn how to hit (and what it does), but the mechanical shot at home off a mat doesn't tell me much of what it's doing.  That's something I should probably try on a real green, not during a round until I've tried it.
    • Day 10 (10 Jun 26) - Played in the midweek shootout at my home course - on aerated and sanded greens - day of trying to figure tempo to get the best roll on the greens.  Approach game was decently solid as was shots off the tee.  
    • Ok, I'm trying to find a feel to hit a consistent ball flight (irons).  My current predicament.  1. I try to do the arms down stuff better, with the club feeling like it is way behind me more. It's just a cluster of results. Most of the time, I can't get any speed on the swing. If I get my arms down faster, I just throw them out.  2. I focus all my attention on turning better. Pushing off with my left leg and getting my right side through better. On the DTL view, this doesn't produce anywhere close where the hands and club should be. The result is usually ball first contact, lower ball flight, more centered contact.  At this point, I am going with option 2. Stop thinking about what the hands do. Just make a shorter backswing, keep it wide, turn through. Somehow, the club head finds the ball. My focus is so much on just making sure I turn, it's like, "Oh, that contact was better.... Oh, that bell flight looks playable." If not, I will just be practicing my entire summer.       
    • Nope, they spent too much money. They are in over 28 million on the football roster and related NIL compensation at this point. Boosters associated with any Texas college football team has HUGE sway. The AD is between a rock and a hard place. They put a lot of money into Sorsby, at the chance of winning a NC this year. If you move on, you basically wasted a lot.  This is why Ohio State wants 3 QB's they feel can start. That is why the backups the past 5 years at some point transfer. Texas Tech has no backup near the quality of Sorsby. If they move on, they are screwed for 2026. 
    • Maybe there's something I still don't understand about the situation. Wouldn't Texas Tech do itself a favor to move on from Sorsby at this point?      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.