Jump to content
IGNORED

Money towards the range, or the course?


MacGregor9
Note: This thread is 4422 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

It's about 10 bucks to get a large bucket of 100 balls at the range. At a cheap course here, 8 bucks will get you a round at super twilight, I usually am able to finish 18. Would you guys spend the money at the range, or the course more often?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Allow me to indirectly answer your question with a short tale of my most recent golf membership purchase.

As a young graduate student, I don't have a lot of money. So little, in fact, that $300 is, more or less, my golf budget for the year. There happens to be a student membership for $300 at a nearby country club, a nice place by the looks of it, but no driving range, and no chipping area. Meanwhile, there is a different country club that offers a $300 driving range membership. This place has a chipping area and a putting green bigger that my apartment complex. The question I faced was: Do I spend my $300 on unlimited rounds of golf, or on unlimited driving range and practice? To decide, I had to ask myself what my biggest goal for the year was. Was it playing as many rounds of golf as possible? Or was it making real changes to my mechanics that would improve my skills forever?

Since then, I've chosen the driving range. After school hours I head to the range, practice chipping and pitching for an hour, practice my big sticks on the range for an hour, and practice putting for an hour. Because I'm not focusing on scoring as high as possible (as I would be on the course), I am free to tinker with my processes and discover what techniques are moving me forward as a better golfer, and what techniques I have been using that have actually been holding me back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If it's not a grass range and the course isn't overly crowded and reasonably maintained I'd play the course.  I spend a lot of time at the range (mats) and it's not the same as playing on grass with different lies, turf textures etc.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Holy christ you can play 18 holes for 8 bucks? My god I thought I was getting away like a bandit for 9 holes at $11.

Anyway, any chance I get Id rather play. Its so much more fun, and I think I get more out of it. Real putting, the pressure to score, tracking stats, etc....

Even if the range would be better for improving, its just so much more fun playing, which is the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Why is this an either/or situation?    Go to the range when you need to work on something specific and go to the course when you want to have some fun playing.

Originally Posted by MacGregor9

It's about 10 bucks to get a large bucket of 100 balls at the range. At a cheap course here, 8 bucks will get you a round at super twilight, I usually am able to finish 18. Would you guys spend the money at the range, or the course more often?



Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by Clambake

Why is this an either/or situation?    Go to the range when you need to work on something specific and go to the course when you want to have some fun playing.

Totally agree..............for me it also depend on what I am working on, if I am working on course managment, then obviously a round is where you need to be. if I only have time for say an hour or a little more or something specific I am working on then the range.  A good drill for the range if you do not want to play around as you practice is to play a round at the range, i.e. hit your driver, then hit a 6 iron then a wedge; simulate the club order you would hit while playing a round and play that imaginary round on the range........If its mats they have I personally would rather just play a round though, I hat mats. Good luck.....and those prices are amazing!

-Steve W.

" Keep it on the short grass "

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It's a not a very nice course, but I will admit, the greens are the best part. I play there often just because of the price, and golf is golf, even if the course has no true fairway/rough lol!

I understand what you guys are saying about why choose one. I guess I was just wondering what you guys would do. Seems like the round is the best way to go usually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If the course is half way decent, I'd play over the the range most of the time.  Just curious, what course is this... I'm in SoCal and if it's anywhere near me, I'd like to know about it.

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
PXG 0211 Driver (Diamana S+ 60; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrids (MMT 80; 22°, 25°, and 28°) · PXG 0311P Gen 2 Irons (SteelFiber i95; 7-PW) · Edel Wedges (KBS Hi-Rev; 50°, 55°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Vice Pro or Maxfli Tour · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · Star Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Sun Mountain C130S Bag

On my MacBook Pro:
Analyzr Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There's Saticoy Regional, which is the course I was referring to being 8 bucks, but it's a nine hole course and isn't really worth a trip up here to Ventura, but then there's Soule Park which is in Ojai, which is decent and is only 12 bucks at 3 pm.

There's also Riverridge and Victoria Lakes, which are right next to one another and are pretty nice. Riverridge has a cool island par 3 for the 18th hole. Then there's Olivas, but it's on the expensive side, and is probably the nicest kept public course here. (http://www.olivaslinks.com/layout9.asp?id=220&page;=7210)

The nice thing is, Riverridge, Victoria Lakes, Olivas and BuenaVentura are all really close to one another. Three are pretty much touching, and the other just down the road a mile or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4422 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • https://static1.squarespace.com/static/603d222df4a6a57df7ef3e29/t/663cdba5d89e3a1848dab8d1/1715264422455/US_DIS_ILND_1_24cv3749_d34676497e293_COMPLAINT_filed_by_SuperSpeed_Golf_LLC_Jury_Demand.pdf The full complaint is there, but  basically, SuperSpeed (SS*) is claiming the Stack System (SS*) Stack System’s [sic] produces inflated metrics later used to, [sic] mislead and deceive consumers. Stack System’s marketing materials inflate apparent swing speed and distance gains through selective presentment of data without qualification that purported gains are not the result, in whole or part, of its training protocol and products. * Yes, I'm joking about abbreviating both "SS." SuperSpeed wants: A judgment that the Stack System has disseminated false and/or misleading information in violation of federal and Illinois law. The deletion of all false advertising distributed and recall of all packaging containing false advertising and a requirement that Stack System issue notices (written or otherwise) to that effect to all current distributors and retailers of its products and all distributors with whom Stack System has done business in the past eighteen months. Written confirmation within 30 days of an injunction detailing the manner and form in which Stack System has complied. An order that Stack System disseminate corrective advertising informing consumers, the trade, and the public of Stack System’s unlawful conduct. 3X all profits received by Stack System as a result of its unlawful actions. 3X all damages sustained by SuperSpeed (as a result of Stack System’s actions) The cost of the action All reasonable attorney fees All other relief to which SuperSpeed are entitled and such other or additional relief as just and proper. Oy.
    • I'm not doing this for the hundred and twentieth time. Sorry in advance, but you get the massively abridged version. Those guys also benefited from the weaker/shallower fields. Also, Watson's career doesn't overlap with Jack's like many think it did. Tom is nearly a decade younger. Jack won only like four majors only after Tom won his first. And Tom won more British Opens than he did all three of the other majors combined, as it was his specialty (not Jack's). Arnie's career similarly doesn't overlap Jack's as much as many think.   Jack would also tell you Tiger was the better golfer.
    • Weaker depth of fields for sure. Some of the top level guys with Jack were pretty awesome. Tom Watson had the lead on the 72nd hole of the 2009 British Open, an event where Tiger missed the cut. Old Tom was almost 60 years old. Jack himself at age 58 finished Top 10 at The 1998 Masters and scored better than Tiger, who won The Masters by 12 shots just a year before that.   The success of both Tom & Jack in older age gives some hope that maybe Tiger can find the magic again at some point. He’s still trying to figure out how to build the stamina for 72 holes after the leg injury. I would love to see him jump on the leaderboard in the coming years. I know a lot of people have given up on him at this point, but that was also true from 2014 to 2017 with the back injuries. He had a hell of a resurgence in 2018 & 2019. Would be fun to see it again. 
    • Perceptive rules question by caddie unlocks Tour pro’s ‘dead zone’ relief A perceptive rules question by Xander Schauffele’s caddie, Austin Kaiser, unlocked “dead zone” relief during the Wells Fargo Championship.
    • I ran across an interesting new clip, Johnson Wagner went into that spot with the Referee who allowed the relief.  Apparently there was a perfectly reasonable shot to be made, as Johnson clearly demonstrated, so relief from the TIO was perfectly appropriate.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...