Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5033 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
The Golf Evolution video (below) is good, and John Graham has some good stuff as well (http://johngrahamgolf.com/blog/the-d-plane/). [VIDEO]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kK8sW5nUFbQ&list;=UU7rdIi1b8OYuXbxE4Y4KJyw&index;=4&feature;=plcp[/VIDEO]

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I watched some D-plane stuff last night but I still didn't understand how its supposed to help me and how I get the correct D-plane..maybe I'm too dense to pick it up from the videos I watched.

My philosophy on golf "We're not doing rocket science, here."


Posted
Originally Posted by Paradox

I watched some D-plane stuff last night but I still didn't understand how its supposed to help me and how I get the correct D-plane..maybe I'm too dense to pick it up from the videos I watched.

Just the realization that a "correctly" hit iron is actually traveling in-to-out at impact (before the bottom of the swing arc is reached and a divot is taken). Conversely, a correctly hit driver is actually traveling out-to-in at impact, since you are making contact after the bottom of the swing arc.

Some people have had success with their drivers by setting up with a little bit of a closed stance.  The idea is that this will alter the swingpath a little bit to counteract the out-to-in movement of the clubhead. It seems to help me, anyway.

Some folks also try to set up to their irons with a little bit of an open stance so that, at impact (so the d-plane theory goes), the clubhead will  be square to the target rather than traveling outward.

Hogan's altering of his stance for each club may have been an early realization of what the d-plane was.  No one knows for sure. But he was an astute observer of his swing, so it wouldn't surprise me.


Posted

just to avoid confusion - just because you are hitting down on an iron does not mean the club is swinging in to out in relation to the target, only in relation to the swing direction.

A swing direction/plane of 3 degrees left and 5 degrees down can produce a straight path through impact with most irons. If your swing direction was 10 degrees left, the only way you could make that go in to out is with an overly steep 20 degree downward angle of attack, or more. This would never be a good thing.

So it is still possible to hit down on a ball and have a left swingpath. Angle of attack is only an influence. Swing direction is a bigger influence (it's 1:1 with a driver).


Posted
Originally Posted by Harmonious

Just the realization that a "correctly" hit iron is actually traveling in-to-out at impact (before the bottom of the swing arc is reached and a divot is taken). Conversely, a correctly hit driver is actually traveling out-to-in at impact, since you are making contact after the bottom of the swing arc.

Some people have had success with their drivers by setting up with a little bit of a closed stance.  The idea is that this will alter the swingpath a little bit to counteract the out-to-in movement of the clubhead. It seems to help me, anyway.

Some folks also try to set up to their irons with a little bit of an open stance so that, at impact (so the d-plane theory goes), the clubhead will  be square to the target rather than traveling outward.

Hogan's altering of his stance for each club may have been an early realization of what the d-plane was.  No one knows for sure. But he was an astute observer of his swing, so it wouldn't surprise me.

Oh yeah Harmonious welcome to the dark side!! To me understanding the D Plane and the Ball Flight laws should be the first things that are taught to any golfer when first start to play because they are simply that important to understand.  Once you understand D Plane you can truly understand how to get yourself in position to execute shot shapes.  And then after the ball flight laws are truly understood then you will never ask yourself why a shot flew the way it did.


  • Administrator
Posted

I might surprise Harmonious a bit with this but I think all the talk of the D-Plane is over-rated and over-stated and over-done.

It's great to know but honestly it takes a few seconds. If hit the ball down more (because you move the ball back in your stance, move your head forward in the downswing, whatever) you'll send the path a little more "out" than you otherwise would, and vice versa.

That's it, as far as playing golf is concerned. That's about all you really need to know.

Originally Posted by Harmonious

Just the realization that a "correctly" hit iron is actually traveling in-to-out at impact (before the bottom of the swing arc is reached and a divot is taken). Conversely, a correctly hit driver is actually traveling out-to-in at impact, since you are making contact after the bottom of the swing arc.

Relative to the baseline or swing direction, yes. But you can also line that up to the left, hit down on the iron, and have the true path of the club being to the left of the target. Or vice versa with the driver, of course (but H knows this).


Originally Posted by Harmonious

Some people have had success with their drivers by setting up with a little bit of a closed stance.  The idea is that this will alter the swingpath a little bit to counteract the out-to-in movement of the clubhead. It seems to help me, anyway.

Bingo. That's the vice versa of my above bit.

Originally Posted by Harmonious

Hogan's altering of his stance for each club may have been an early realization of what the d-plane was.  No one knows for sure. But he was an astute observer of his swing, so it wouldn't surprise me.

I agree. Hogan played a fade but the ball moved like a yard or two - it wasn't a big sweeping fade. Most pros move the ball only a little.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5033 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have an update… I don't have much of a response, because the fact that they would ADD the numbers for the lead and trail shoulder together… I mean, wow. I was giving them too much credit. Nobody would think to assume they were doing THAT. That's beyond comical. One of the biomechanists I talked to put it this way: "So if I squatted down and went from 180 to 90 deg knee angle, then I would say 180 deg range of motion because I have two knees?" I'd type more (maybe), but honestly, I'm laughing a bit too hard. 🤣 Update: Mini Manavian blocked me on Instagram, so I cannot see his post showing Bryson with about 50° of range of motion (with a driver) from P4 to P7, and 75° only if you go out to the mid-follow-through. What a terrible loss for me. 😉 
    • Thanks, interesting to read. The swing is definitely very timing dependent. I hit it consistently I guess but consistently bad.    
    • I've shot 91-74 on the same day before. Couple of years ago played a two round tournament on Bethpage Black. I shot 72 in the first round and 90 in the second. First round I played very well. Second round I played okay, but had about 5 shots that hit the lips of bunkers and bounced down into them. A couple of those wound up in footprints - I was unamused - and I failed to get them out. Anyway - lots of bunkers and my bunker play isn't great and then add a couple of footprints and me getting pretty tired and it added up to a lot.  Only you can really tell though what's causing the variance. It might be that your swing is very timing dependent and when it's timed well you play well and when it's not then it goes all over the place. In that case, some lessons and working on your swing could be the key. If it's more that you tend to feel like you hit it fairly consistently, but you have days where the shots come off and days where they don't, then that's more likely a course management issue. If that's what you need to work on, then you could read Lowest Score Wins and build a plan of attack based on that.  Rest assured though that a pretty big range from high to low is fairly common. Even PGA Tour players often have 18-20 shot spreads from best to worst rounds in a season. It's a common affliction among golfers.
    • Wordle 1,822 3/6 🟨⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,822 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ 🟨⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.