Jump to content
IGNORED

What will a good ball do for me?


Note: This thread is 3890 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Ok so lately I've been playing from about 6-730 at night and its very tough to track the ball. Even on some good shots slightly off the Fairway i can't find. Anyway I'm still learning and lose a decent amount of balls so my question is what am I missing out on by playing the balls below. Am I losing distance? Whant makes the better ball better? Sorry if this quesrion has been answersed before http://t.dickssportinggoods.com/product/index.jsp?productId=19173796&lmdn;=Price&cp;=4413989 Or these http://t.dickssportinggoods.com/product/index.jsp?productId=18665716
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Ok so lately I've been playing from about 6-730 at night and its very tough to track the ball. Even on some good shots slightly off the Fairway i can't find. Anyway I'm still learning and lose a decent amount of balls so my question is what am I missing out on by playing the balls below. Am I losing distance? Whant makes the better ball better? Sorry if this quesrion has been answersed before

http://t.dickssportinggoods.com/product/index.jsp?productId=19173796&lmdn;=Price&cp;=4413989

Or these

http://t.dickssportinggoods.com/product/index.jsp?productId=18665716

There's a lot of things that make different balls better or worse - there really is a science behind the design of these things.  Unfortunately you and I wont feel many of those differences because we don't strike the ball as pure as someone who is a pro, scratch or single digit handicap.

There are many good balls out there that aren't that expensive (those in the $20/dz price range) and sometimes cheaper than that.  Just use what you find that's cheap, and determine if you want a cheap ball designed around extra distance (which is going to give you less performance around the greens) or a ball designed for feel (which *might* mean less distance off the tee).  The box will tell you which of these the ball is meant to do.  I have played so many different balls this year, and I just don't see much difference in my off the tee distance.  My clubs still hit the ball about the same distance.  So I choose to play balls that are supposed to be super soft because I don't spin the ball much and need all the help I can get.

Callaway XR 9.5 + 1, Taylormade R15 3 Wood, Burner 3 Rescue, Callaway XHot 5H, Warbird 4H, Nike Vapor Fly 6-AW Irons, Titleist Vokey 54, 60 Wedges, Taylormade Rossa Fontana Putter, Srixon Z-Star Tour Yellow.

Best Score 2017:  82 (Traditions at the Glen, Par 70)

Favorite Course - Conklin Players Club (Par 72) - Best Score 86

Link to comment
Share on other sites


IMO there are two kinds of balls: Soft ones for greens work, and distance balls.  I prefer the soft feel around the greens - I hate hitting rocks with wedges and putting...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


IMO there are two kinds of balls: Soft ones for greens work, and distance balls.  I prefer the soft feel around the greens - I hate hitting rocks with wedges and putting...

Where does the Bridgestone e6 get categorized in that scale?  That is the ball I'm currently playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Where does the Bridgestone e6 get categorized in that scale?  That is the ball I'm currently playing.

Kind of in the middle IMO.  I used to play that ball - its design is to reduce as much spin as possible (sidespin off of a driver say for example) which will help keep the ball straighter.  Of course if you banana slice it there isn't any ball that's going to help you.  But with any low spin ball that also means you're going to get less performance around the green.  I wouldn't say the e6 is a rock, it's a very good ball.  I can tell you that once I started hitting the ball more accurately with my driver I moved on from the e6 and have begun to play a softer ball which will stop on the green a bit quicker.

If you don't have major slicing issues - you might try the Nike PD Soft or Bridgestone Treosoft - both of these can be had around $15-$20 per dozen so they don't break the bank, and both have pretty good feel to them.  They aren't distance balls, mind you, so you may not get quite as much distance as say the e6, but you'll get softer feel around the greens and they'll probably have a more smooth feel off the putter face.  But then again a lot of that is based upon the individual.

Callaway XR 9.5 + 1, Taylormade R15 3 Wood, Burner 3 Rescue, Callaway XHot 5H, Warbird 4H, Nike Vapor Fly 6-AW Irons, Titleist Vokey 54, 60 Wedges, Taylormade Rossa Fontana Putter, Srixon Z-Star Tour Yellow.

Best Score 2017:  82 (Traditions at the Glen, Par 70)

Favorite Course - Conklin Players Club (Par 72) - Best Score 86

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Kind of in the middle IMO.  I used to play that ball - its design is to reduce as much spin as possible (sidespin off of a driver say for example) which will help keep the ball straighter.  Of course if you banana slice it there isn't any ball that's going to help you.  But with any low spin ball that also means you're going to get less performance around the green.  I wouldn't say the e6 is a rock, it's a very good ball.  I can tell you that once I started hitting the ball more accurately with my driver I moved on from the e6 and have begun to play a softer ball which will stop on the green a bit quicker.

If you don't have major slicing issues - you might try the Nike PD Soft or Bridgestone Treosoft - both of these can be had around $15-$20 per dozen so they don't break the bank, and both have pretty good feel to them.  They aren't distance balls, mind you, so you may not get quite as much distance as say the e6, but you'll get softer feel around the greens and they'll probably have a more smooth feel off the putter face.  But then again a lot of that is based upon the individual.

Well I don't know many people who say "I don't need any more control with my driver" so it seems like low spin balls should be more popular right?  Are there other balls that are low spin like the e6 but also give you more softness around the greens?

I would say my priorities for a ball as of now are in this order:

-control on drives

-softness around greens

-distance

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I suppose everyone feels something different but I think the E6 feels like a marshmallow, it's advertised as the softest multilayer ball on the market. For me the best sub $30 all around ball is the NXT Tour/Tour S though lately I've been playing the Velocity. People gripe about it not holding greens but I spend a lot of time fixing deep ball marks so not a problem for me.

Dave :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Ok so lately I've been playing from about 6-730 at night and its very tough to track the ball. Even on some good shots slightly off the Fairway i can't find. Anyway I'm still learning and lose a decent amount of balls so my question is what am I missing out on by playing the balls below. Am I losing distance? Whant makes the better ball better? Sorry if this quesrion has been answersed before http://t.dickssportinggoods.com/product/index.jsp?productId=19173796&lmdn;=Price&cp;=4413989 Or these http://t.dickssportinggoods.com/product/index.jsp?productId=18665716

If you lose a lot of balls, I would suggest not playing so late if possible. Lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well I don't know many people who say "I don't need any more control with my driver" so it seems like low spin balls should be more popular right?  Are there other balls that are low spin like the e6 but also give you more softness around the greens?

I would say my priorities for a ball as of now are in this order:

-control on drives

-softness around greens

-distance

It's not about dumping the e6 because "I don't need anymore control with my driver".  But think of it this way - where does the vast majority of your strokes during a round happen - around or on the green.  Any shot taken inside a full wedge shot and putting.  So which would you rather have?  A ball that might get you a couple more yards at best?  Or one that has softer more responsive feel around the green?  Me, I'd rather take the latter.  I might hit my driver twice in a round - and I haven't actually even taken my driver out of my bag in my last 3 rounds.  I play my 3 hybrid most off the tee.

Callaway XR 9.5 + 1, Taylormade R15 3 Wood, Burner 3 Rescue, Callaway XHot 5H, Warbird 4H, Nike Vapor Fly 6-AW Irons, Titleist Vokey 54, 60 Wedges, Taylormade Rossa Fontana Putter, Srixon Z-Star Tour Yellow.

Best Score 2017:  82 (Traditions at the Glen, Par 70)

Favorite Course - Conklin Players Club (Par 72) - Best Score 86

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It's not about dumping the e6 because "I don't need anymore control with my driver".  But think of it this way - where does the vast majority of your strokes during a round happen - around or on the green.  Any shot taken inside a full wedge shot and putting.  So which would you rather have?  A ball that might get you a couple more yards at best?  Or one that has softer more responsive feel around the green?  Me, I'd rather take the latter.  I might hit my driver twice in a round - and I haven't actually even taken my driver out of my bag in my last 3 rounds.  I play my 3 hybrid most off the tee.

I know there are kind of 2 different thoughts on this.  I tend to believe that the driver is one of the most important parts of the game despite only using it maybe 10 times per round.  If you hit it long and in the fairway on those times they you're setting yourself up for a pretty good round.  Not to say the 100 yards and in game isn't important too.

However...I don't know that switching to a ball that isn't "low spin" will make much of a difference on my drives.  I can't say that I've ever really felt much difference in golf balls and I've played a ton of different kinds.  Lately I have been sticking with the e6 but I'd like to at least try a softer ball. Maybe bridgestone's tour ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Distance is hugely overrated. Play a ball that suits your short game.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I know there are kind of 2 different thoughts on this.  I tend to believe that the driver is one of the most important parts of the game despite only using it maybe 10 times per round.  If you hit it long and in the fairway on those times they you're setting yourself up for a pretty good round.  Not to say the 100 yards and in game isn't important too.

However...I don't know that switching to a ball that isn't "low spin" will make much of a difference on my drives.  I can't say that I've ever really felt much difference in golf balls and I've played a ton of different kinds.  Lately I have been sticking with the e6 but I'd like to at least try a softer ball. Maybe bridgestone's tour ball.

Unless you have a touring pros swing speed then don't play a tour ball as it might actually hurt your game.  There's a reason pro's play clubs that need to be hit directly on the sweet spot - because they offer the most workability generally, responsiveness and precision.  There's a reason why it as a result is stupid for anyone else to play them - because we don't strike the ball right smack on that sweet spot EVERY single time like a pro.  Using Tiger Woods clubs would make us play worse - not better.  Same thing goes for balls.

Callaway XR 9.5 + 1, Taylormade R15 3 Wood, Burner 3 Rescue, Callaway XHot 5H, Warbird 4H, Nike Vapor Fly 6-AW Irons, Titleist Vokey 54, 60 Wedges, Taylormade Rossa Fontana Putter, Srixon Z-Star Tour Yellow.

Best Score 2017:  82 (Traditions at the Glen, Par 70)

Favorite Course - Conklin Players Club (Par 72) - Best Score 86

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm a big fan of Titleist DT SOLO balls...

I'll second that. Great feeling ball, responsive and reasonably priced.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Anyone else just not into titleist?  I don't like playing the balls because everyone always seems to be playing titleist balls so it would get confusing and their balls are kinda boring looking.  Also their clubs are always a little more expensive than everything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


their balls are kinda boring looking.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Smell Good

Also their clubs are always a little more expensive than everything else.

How is that relevant?

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Nike makes decent distance/soft balls... I really like the feel of lower compression balls in the short game. How are golf balls more boring? [quote name="Mr Smell Good" url="/t/69904/what-will-a-good-ball-do-for-me#post_896229"]Anyone else just not into titleist?  I don't like playing the balls because everyone always seems to be playing titleist balls so it would get confusing and their balls are kinda boring looking.  Also their clubs are always a little more expensive than everything else. [/quote]
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3890 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • 2 rounds this weekend, one at my home course and another course that I know well.   Played well for 3 of the 4 nines.    Ended up with an 80 and an 88.  Breaking it down by 9, it was 38, 42, 41, and a tough 47 where I somehow ended up with chipping/pitching shanks where I dropped at least 6 strokes on the last 6 holes.
    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It is almost six years old, though perhaps modified since then. It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice. As long as I frequently hit balls on the range or course, I'll get feedback on any changes there.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Yea it is. A gave my brother a set of cobra irons at least a decade old and he walked away with 29 dollars worth of skin money the other day. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...