Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
  • entries
    77
  • comments
    854
  • views
    46,077

Driving in the UK from an American POV


Don't know the exact model of the car I rented, an Octavia 4 door sedan, rental guy (who looked and sounded like one of the assassins in a Jason Borne movie said it was equivalent to a VW Passat or Jetta.

  • In stop and go traffic, the engine auto shuts off when at rest. Radio and A/C stay on. When you engage the shifter or clutch, turn the wheel, car auto turns on. In the US, I sometimes did this manually, shut off the car when I knew we were going to be at a complete rest for a bit. Great gas and environmentally friendly feature. I wonder about the wear and tear on the starter though.
  • Car recovers from stall outs much quicker. If you let go of the clutch while the car is in gear, not as much lurch.
  • Love the yellow and red lights on simultaneously to indicate green is coming.
  • Road closures in London are crazy, plays havoc with GPS directions.
  • The only step up to an automatic is 75 pounds a day, a Mercedes Benz, what a way to extract money. No thank you, please don't buy me a Mercedes Benz Janis.
  • Rest stops (called Services) on the major highways have a motel, like a Days Inn, for example, attached to them.
  • There's a dichotomy, between saving gas - manual transmission and people cruising around 80-85mph, some going much faster, on the fast lane on your motorways. To me, that's more an income distribution divide than a driving style one.
  • The English countryside is beautiful. There is nothing like it in the US. The verdant greens and bucolic vistas are something. I've seen them before, but they're still breathtaking.

14 Comments


Recommended Comments

saevel25

Posted

Quote

Love the yellow and red lights on simultaneously to indicate green is coming

So is the phasing like this then? 

Red
Yellow - Red
Green
Blinking Green
Yellow
Red

I read they blink the green as well as to indicate the light is changing to red. 

I know in Massachusetts and I think in Brooklyn they have Yellow-Red for when they have diagonal crosswalks for pedestrians. 

An issue for that in the US would be people trying to time the signal to make the light. 

Pete

Posted

51 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

So is the phasing like this then? 

Red
Yellow - Red
Green
Blinking Green
Yellow
Red

No they just go back from green, to yellow then to red. They don't flash green.

Basically, yellow and red is a 'don't move yet, but get ready, green is coming'

Yellow by itself is 'ok you may be too close to stop safely as it was green as you were approaching, so you can go through (no red light), but it'll be red any second now'. 

  • Moderator
nevets88

Posted

7 hours ago, Pete said:

No they just go back from green, to yellow then to red. They don't flash green.

Basically, yellow and red is a 'don't move yet, but get ready, green is coming'

Yellow by itself is 'ok you may be too close to stop safely as it was green as you were approaching, so you can go through (no red light), but it'll be red any second now'. 

There are also the blinking yellows.

The red lights on the bridges to London center seem like forever. I normally prefer public transit, but for reasons out of my control, needed a car in the city. Total headache. Worse than NYC.

ZappyAd

Posted

13 hours ago, nevets88 said:

There are also the blinking yellows.

That is probably at a pedestrian crossing - after red it means if there is nobody crossing cars can start moving again but you have to give way if you see a walker.  It is probably designed to get traffic moving again if there is nobody crossing, rather than just having cars stopped at red waiting for an empty crossing.

 

13 hours ago, nevets88 said:

needed a car in the city.

Did you get told about the congestion charge and how to pay it?

Gunther

Posted

Couple things:

1.  Wouldn't the constant starts use more gas than sitting idle because of the burst of gas from the fuel injectors?

2.  Loved the roundabouts there, so much more efficient than 4-way stops.

3.  Was surprised how quick I got used to driving on the right and shifting with my left.

  • Moderator
nevets88

Posted

2 hours ago, ZappyAd said:

Did you get told about the congestion charge and how to pay it?

Congestion charge is why I went during the weekend. You'd figure Sunday morning wouldn't be too bad, it was god awful. 

Was thinking about taking the train in and then Zipcar-ing it to avoid the congestion charge, there are Zipcars within the congestion zone, but I'd rather shoot myself.

Hardspoon

Posted

15 hours ago, Gunther said:

Couple things:

1.  Wouldn't the constant starts use more gas than sitting idle because of the burst of gas from the fuel injectors?

They definitely save fuel; the problem is the wear on the starter and the battery requirements:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/08/automobiles/wheels/start-stop-technology-is-coming-to-cars-like-it-or-not.html

On ‎7‎/‎11‎/‎2016 at 7:30 AM, saevel25 said:

An issue for that in the US would be people trying to time the signal to make the light. 

Big-time.  In the two cities I've lived in (Philadelphia and Pittsburgh), any indication that a light is about to turn green would be an invitation to vehicular manslaughter.

When my wife and I visited London, we ended up using public transit and just walking (average was probably nearly 10 miles per day)...my only regret about our visit (one week) was that I didn't get a car for one day just to try it.

  • Upvote 1
  • Moderator
nevets88

Posted

They pass you from the opposite side at high speeds with the narrowest of margins. Inches. Drivers know the dimensions of their cars  

Also, there are far fewer opportunities to pull over and look at the gps. There are far fewer shoulders. Much less space. 

RandallT

Posted

FWIW, my Ford Fusion hybrid is constantly stopping and starting its motor. It is all unobtrusive, as the start does not feel like a traditional car start where you crank the key. When the car needs more power than it gets from the battery (or if it needs to charge the battery), the engine quietly kicks back in. 

Hard to say why, but I just feel like it doesn't take a lot of energy to start it. It's almost seamless. I used to doubt whether that made sense to shut down the engine like it does, but the engine does stay off for long enough, that it must make sense.

I've gotten 38/39mpg now for years, so that says something.

  • Upvote 1
  • Moderator
nevets88

Posted

2 hours ago, RandallT said:

FWIW, my Ford Fusion hybrid is constantly stopping and starting its motor. It is all unobtrusive, as the start does not feel like a traditional car start where you crank the key. When the car needs more power than it gets from the battery (or if it needs to charge the battery), the engine quietly kicks back in. 

Hard to say why, but I just feel like it doesn't take a lot of energy to start it. It's almost seamless. I used to doubt whether that made sense to shut down the engine like it does, but the engine does stay off for long enough, that it must make sense.

I've gotten 38/39mpg now for years, so that says something.

 

10 hours ago, Hardspoon said:

They definitely save fuel; the problem is the wear on the starter and the battery requirements:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/08/automobiles/wheels/start-stop-technology-is-coming-to-cars-like-it-or-not.html

Big-time.  In the two cities I've lived in (Philadelphia and Pittsburgh), any indication that a light is about to turn green would be an invitation to vehicular manslaughter.

When my wife and I visited London, we ended up using public transit and just walking (average was probably nearly 10 miles per day)...my only regret about our visit (one week) was that I didn't get a car for one day just to try it.

I don't mind the start/stop feature, not as anywhere near annoying as that one person in the NYT article says. I estimate in the stop and go traffic I was in, the engine was off for at least 20 minutes - that's a lot of time you're not burning fuel, polluting the environment. Even in small cities and the countryside (train crossings) it's useful. It doesn't prevent you from getting going when the light turns green. 

DeadMan

Posted

About a year ago, I visited Australia and New Zealand and did a fair amount of driving there (they also drive on the left side of the road). The only thing that was difficult for me was that the turn signal and windshield wiper levers were flipped. So whenever I tried to signal for a turn, I ended up turning the wipers on. My wife thought it was hilarious.

  • Moderator
nevets88

Posted

Love the parking lots that read your tags, then you input tag in a machine, pay when you go, leave as camera reads your plates and it knows you paid. Totally automatic w/the app. 

Your typical two way one lane road in the country. Just barely enough for two cars to pass, only one in portions. That's a compact sized car in the photo.

image.jpeg

  • Moderator
DaveP043

Posted

17 minutes ago, nevets88 said:

Your typical two way one lane road in the country. Just barely enough for two cars to pass, only one in portions. That's a compact sized car in the photo.

While in Ireland, the GPS sent us down a few roads that would make the one in the photo look like a superhighway.  Tree branches brushing the sides of the car on BOTH sides, you had to find a driveway if you met someone coming the other way.  But we found that the Irish drivers were consistently polite and considerate, and if someone needed to back up a bit to find a wide spot, it was no problem.  Maybe its because the standard transmissions make texting and phoning virtually impossible, so they're actually paying attention to the driving.

  • Moderator
nevets88

Posted

1 hour ago, DaveP043 said:

While in Ireland, the GPS sent us down a few roads that would make the one in the photo look like a superhighway.  Tree branches brushing the sides of the car on BOTH sides, you had to find a driveway if you met someone coming the other way.  But we found that the Irish drivers were consistently polite and considerate, and if someone needed to back up a bit to find a wide spot, it was no problem.  Maybe its because the standard transmissions make texting and phoning virtually impossible, so they're actually paying attention to the driving.

Ran into those super skinny hedge surrounded roads as well. I'm glad I didn't have to back up in one. Drivers here are very considerate.  Here's one of the two way roads with the hedges.

image.jpeg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Blog Entries

  • Posts

    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.