Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
  • entries
    77
  • comments
    854
  • views
    46,080

The Cable Stayed Bridge


The cabled stayed bridge. When done right, it can really transform a skyline and especially look dramatic at night. Under certain conditions, it costs less to build and maintain than a suspension bridge, something to do with maximum road segment length. But it seems many of these projects are plagued with cost overruns. Rusted supports, salt water eating away. If they're supposed to save money, you wouldn't be able to tell based on news headlines. See eastern segment of the Bay Bridge.

If you travel around the world and return home only to see none, you wonder where are my taxes going? Why isn't the infrastructure being updated? Of course it makes no sense to tear down an old bridge and put up a new one just for the sake of it, but NYC, for example, has some pretty old, ugly looking bridges that must cost a pretty penny to maintain. The pigeon droppings alone costs a substantial amount to clean. The Williamsburg. The Manhattan. They just look... old.

The first cable stayed bridge in the US was built in Washington in the late 70s. Tampa has a stunning one. Boston's was finished 13 years ago. The one in Delaware is over 20 years old. Oakland has a new bridge to rival the GG. There are about 30 in the US. There are at least 60 in China alone and there are some stunning ones around the world. One of the bridges below is Calatrava's, but his projects tend to go over budget.

709f4532baa6e9c9549cb6b6ddf0b2cb.jpg

490926111_54_990x660.jpg

Jerusalem_Chords_Bridge_5.JPG

The NYC metro area is finally getting two. There are currently two in existence, but they're pedestrian bridges, at Rockefeller University and the Intrepid, that's it. You have the new Goethels and the Tappan Zee replacement, which 44 fast tracked because the TPZ was literally falling apart with holes and way over its 50 year shelf life and built to bear a lighter load than it does now. I guess that's not uncommon, we wait until the last minute or an accident to do something.

Who knows how much the final tally will be, but at least it's a sign we're updating our infrastructure. The new TPZ (The New NY Bridge? Hope it gets a more original name) has a pedestrian roadway, you'll finally be able to cross the Hudson on foot or bike from Nyack to Tarrytown. For 4 billion, there better be one.

http://www.johnweeks.com/cablestay/index.html

20160807_170535-cropped-Goethals-Bridge-

SCG_0089hr.jpg

 

new-goethals-bridge-6e01eeec2abe3d5c.jpg

5635-tappan-zee-hudson-river-crossing-de

The C&D

C&D_Canal_Bridge_3.png

Cooper River Bridge

cooper_river_bridge_2_by_carise-d33wggc.

On a totally unrelated note since we're speaking about infrastructure:

Grandstand-Stadium-777x587.jpg

  • Like 1

35 Comments


Recommended Comments



  • Administrator
iacas

Posted

A fascination of yours, or just something that happened to pique your interest today?

  • Moderator
nevets88

Posted

9 minutes ago, iacas said:

A fascination of yours, or just something that happened to pique your interest today?

The first, find them interesting, bridges/tunnels, and use them all the time, by car, bicycle and foot. Also did the Lincoln Tunnel fun run (5K) and cycle across the GW. Infrastructure is sexy :-D

natureboy

Posted

When you engage Calatrava, you are typically expecting to pay a premium for 'signature' architecture and artistic design vs. merely functional.

  • Moderator
billchao

Posted

Cool. I didn't know what the new Goethals Bridge is going to look like when it is completed. Every time I drive on it I always think that's got to be a pretty cool project to work on.

  • Moderator
nevets88

Posted

These bridges are 16 and 12 years old respectively:

The Oresund Bridge - connects Denmark to Sweden. Toll? Around $50+ US. You definitely want to buy into the subscription plan, which cuts it in half.

oresund-bridge-tunnel-connects-denmark-a

Millau Viaduct in France - Toll is a more reasonable $10.

millau-viaduct-cable-stayed-bridge-in-france-tallest-in-the-world-2.jpg

Hardspoon

Posted

Fun fact: the Brooklyn Bridge is actually a hybrid suspension/cable-stay bridge. 

image.jpeg

 

  • Moderator
billchao

Posted

12 minutes ago, Hardspoon said:

Fun fact: the Brooklyn Bridge is actually a hybrid suspension/cable-stay bridge. 

image.jpeg

 

Another fun fact: I'm also currently selling it. PM me for more info.

  • Upvote 2
Hardspoon

Posted

1 minute ago, billchao said:

Another fun fact: I'm also currently selling it. PM me for more info.

Nice try, buddy. I learned about this scam in my Adulting class.

  • Upvote 3
  • Moderator
nevets88

Posted

1 hour ago, Hardspoon said:

Fun fact: the Brooklyn Bridge is actually a hybrid suspension/cable-stay bridge. 

Another one: You used to be able to sneak in and walk up the cable span to the top of the suspension tower if you're not afraid of heights. Going up isn't too bad, going down, when you see what's below you, stress. Then 9/11 happened.

JonMA1

Posted (edited)

SunshineSkywayBridge.jpg

Here's an image of the Sunshine Skyway that spans Tampa Bay and was referred to in the OP. It is pretty cool at night.

It was rebuilt after a tragic event in 1980. Don't know how much news it made in the rest of the country, but for those of us who traveled the bridge and lived in the area, it was very sad...

http://www.sptimes.com/News/050700/TampaBay/Horrific_accident_cre.shtml

 

Edited by JonMA1
dennyjones

Posted

That is something I didn't remember but so tragic.   

I like the design of these bridges.  

vasaribm

Posted

On 9/5/2016 at 5:35 PM, Hardspoon said:

Fun fact: the Brooklyn Bridge is actually a hybrid suspension/cable-stay bridge. 

The Roebling Bridge here in Cincinnati was the unofficial test run for the Brooklyn Bridge; note their similarity.

I've been a part of the design team for 2 cable stayed structures.  Pomeroy-Mason and Ironton-Russell, both over the Ohio River, and both using a similar design has the Cooper River shown earlier.  Long span bridge design is by nature "cutting edge", but bridge owners do not like to be cutting edge for fear of maintenance problems.  A perfect example is the East section of the Bay Bridge.  The self anchoring design is a first in the US and the designers and contractors are learning as they go and the state is paying the price for the experiment.

The artistic, curved structures are more common in Europe and Asia because of looser building codes, construction practices, and willingness to try newer materials like carbon fiber. Not to mention they are a b*tch to design.  Ohio is doing a study on carbon fiber prestressing strands vs steel strands, unfortunately the cost for carbon fiber is currently 4X that of steel.  State DOT's do not have room in their funding to increase costs by 4, so we tend to stick with what is known to work.

Windows Photo Viewer Wallpaper.jpg

  • Upvote 1
  • Moderator
nevets88

Posted

40 minutes ago, vasaribm said:

The Roebling Bridge here in Cincinnati was the unofficial test run for the Brooklyn Bridge; note their similarity.

I've been a part of the design team for 2 cable stayed structures.  Pomeroy-Mason and Ironton-Russell, both over the Ohio River, and both using a similar design has the Cooper River shown earlier.  Long span bridge design is by nature "cutting edge", but bridge owners do not like to be cutting edge for fear of maintenance problems.  A perfect example is the East section of the Bay Bridge.  The self anchoring design is a first in the US and the designers and contractors are learning as they go and the state is paying the price for the experiment.

The artistic, curved structures are more common in Europe and Asia because of looser building codes, construction practices, and willingness to try newer materials like carbon fiber. Not to mention they are a b*tch to design.  Ohio is doing a study on carbon fiber prestressing strands vs steel strands, unfortunately the cost for carbon fiber is currently 4X that of steel.  State DOT's do not have room in their funding to increase costs by 4, so we tend to stick with what is known to work.

Windows Photo Viewer Wallpaper.jpg

Thanks for the info. I should look on YouTube or the streaming services for a documentary, would totally watch it.

  • Moderator
nevets88

Posted

Apparently I was wrong (why is there no one correcting me, Brooklyn hipsters?), there are three in the NY area, or more probably? I neglected the new Kosciuszko Bridge, I've passed by it enough times, totally forgot.

gnlFgBVr.jpg

5dXH1GU.jpg

AGQsgch.jpg

qS8lEz3r.jpg

jamo

Posted

Leonard_P._Zakim_Bunker_Hill_Bridge_-_Bo

I like using the Zakim Bridge in Boston as my background on various websites. Pretty cool looking at night when it's all lit up.

DSCF5172.jpg

The Delaware Memorial Bridge is also a pretty cool one that I've driven over a bunch.

  • Moderator
nevets88

Posted

The Chesapeake and Delaware Canal Bridge looks great at night. It comes out of nowhere.

image.jpeg

  • Moderator
nevets88

Posted

Progress on the New NY Bridge. Even under construction, with some of the cables now in place, looks dramatic.

TZC161114_Westchester_lr.jpg

TZC161116p0645lr.jpg

 

jsgolfer

Posted

On 10/22/2016 at 7:01 PM, Papa Steve 55 said:

Penobscot ME

IMG_7501.JPG

The Bridge to Verona Island, I worked on this project for the Maine DOT back in the day.

dennyjones

Posted

406801_10150510667973429_1876206063_n.jp

There really are cables on the Mackinaw bridge during the winter.

  • Moderator
billchao

Posted

On 12/19/2016 at 0:54 PM, nevets88 said:

Progress on the New NY Bridge. Even under construction, with some of the cables now in place, looks dramatic.

TZC161114_Westchester_lr.jpg

TZC161116p0645lr.jpg

 

I drive on the Goethals at least a couple of times a week, it's been pretty cool to see how the construction develops. Every once in a while you see a flatbed on Route 1 with one of the cable supports on it.

  • Moderator
nevets88

Posted

Kosciuszko is open. INFRASTRUCTURE. NY finally has a cable stayed bridge, took us long enough. We're behind the cutting edge in A LOT of things. 

image.jpeg

  • Moderator
nevets88

Posted

Totally forgot I had dashcam coverage of the bridge:

 

  • Moderator
nevets88

Posted

Goethals open now. Cable stayed bridge #2.

#3 soon

02TAPPANZEE1-superJumbo.jpg


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Blog Entries

  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.