Jump to content
  • entries
  • comments
  • views

Reflections on Golf and Life After ECU Injury - Part 6

Sign in to follow this  


I had a lot of fun playing disc golf, but the fall of 2015 came quickly and I started to prepare for an attempt at swinging the sticks again.  I went to the range in the middle part of September and tried some very light swinging.  I was not hitting the ball far at all, but it seemed to go pretty well.  I was just taking half swings with some wedges and a 7 iron.  I was happy with the results and so the next week that I went out I decided to try and use a couple long irons.  As soon as I started trying to swing the longer clubs, even with the half swings, I immediately started having problems with the ECU tendon snapping out of place again.  In my mind I knew I was probably not going to get better without the surgery.  It was time to schedule the surgery at this point. 

The only remaining issue with the decision was really a financial one.  My health insurance is a Health Savings Account (HSA).  Usually there is a reduced premium with this but it comes with a sizable out of pocket deductible.  It was $4500 in my case for the family.  We had not really used much of our deductible up for that year.  I decided to wait until January 2016 to have the MRI done for the surgery so we could have it all taken care of at the beginning of the year.  That way any additional medical bills for my family and all my additional physical therapy would be taken care of for that year.  It delayed things a few more months, but I was good with the decision based on the financial practicality of it. 

I never had an MRI done before and have to say that was quite the awkward experience.  I did not really think I would have a problem with it, but there were a couple moments I had to find a “happy place” in my mind, so to speak.  The MRI technician was also getting a bit frustrated trying to get me to lay still for 5-7 minutes at a time.  I had to re-do a couple of the scans. :-)  We managed to get it done though and my follow up with the doctor to tell me the results was a couple weeks later. 

The meeting with the doctor was quick.  He basically told me the MRI results showed I had two problems.  There was a problem with the ECU as we already knew.  There was also a tear in the TFCC in the wrist as well.  I was not really sure what this was, but it was in the same area as the ECU and also possibly why the injured area was not healing naturally.  I was glad to have the MRI results and we scheduled the surgery for February 2nd.  I was very much looking forward to getting this over with. 


Sign in to follow this  


Recommended Comments

5 minutes ago, No Mulligans said:

Good luck with your surgery.

The surgery was over a year ago. :-) Nate is writing this all in hindsight, hopefully to be timed with his return to hitting balls here in a few weeks/months.

Share this comment

Link to comment
35 minutes ago, No Mulligans said:

Good luck with your surgery.

Learn something everyday, didn't know what an ECU was.  I did a google search.

Yep the surgery was back in February of 2016.  I was not able to play last year after the surgery.  I will get to that in the coming weeks.  I am timing the blog with my attempt to return to golf, so that is why the delay in the story.  Check out blog #4 for info on ECU subluxation as well if you are looking for that.

Share this comment

Link to comment

It sucks that anyone has to delay treating a medical issue as a result of deductibles, finances, etc..  It is one thing to delay purchasing a home, car or sofa; most things in life are discretionary. Many health issues should transcend one's financial situation.  I don't profess to know the answer.  Clearly no one else seems to either.

Share this comment

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Blog Entries

  • Posts

    • I think I am grasping the premise of what this video is demonstrating but I don't think that it was demonstrated properly.  If you were only trying to isolate the arms then you should be sitting in a chair ,keeping your shoulders parallel to the target line the whole time, and not setting your wrists which you showed provided 45 mph.  I doubt that you would then generate 95 mph of swing speed and would probably make about half of that. I say this because when you demonstrated the upper body swing you had the benefit of hitting against a stable base and torso because the point was to try to use no lower body at all. However you did set your wrists and that contributed with 45 mph of extra speed that you didn't have when you did the lower body only swing.  Your arms only swing has the benefit of using the wrists as a lever where as the  lower body only swing did not.  The speed of your arms was transferred to a lever point, the wrists, and speed was added, where as if you didn't set your wrists then that would have been more accurate because the speed of the arms would have been transferred directly to the club, and the speed delivered would have been much less. This is exactly what happened in the lower body swing but you had to drag the club through impact because the intent was to only use the lower body.  The lower body only swing had no kinematic transfer of speed, where the arms only swing did, and this where I see your experiment was flawed.  I am in the camp of feeling like my upper body is passive and that I don't set my wrists but I know that it is happening at some point in the swing because I swing 118 mph.  I know that I have fast hips and I try to feel like my upper body, lower, body, and the club, are coming through impact all at one time but I know that is not what is happening in reality because feel is not real of course.  I hope my explanation was clear and that my point was made. 
    • Are you kidding? They pretty much only use rules officials to confirm rules that you learn in your first week of playing the game.
    • I think they are accustomed to playing courses set up in a certain way most every time, and have come to expect a certain base level of ‘playability’ (rough height, green speed, pin placements). They certainly complain when thier normal shots don’t have ‘expected’ results.  They generally execute ‘superb, excellent, or very good’ shots and get upset with any poor results.   I think this expectation, along with the pressure they play under accounts for their frustration. It shows the most  clearly only occasionally (during majors) where they are having thier worst shots, and some normally ‘acceptable’ shots heavily, instead of moderately penalized.  Amatuers complain just as much, if not more when our results are not good.  But we have our lack of talent and execution to blame more readily than PGA Tour players. We amateurs execute ‘very good, pretty good, poor, or very poor’ shots and can more easily understand when things don’t work out.  It’s also interesting to me how the pros play very difficult courses that are set up to play more easily, with perfectly manicured fairways, greens and rough, plus tamped down rough from spectators, and tons of help from spectators and volunteers/staff to locate balls. Not to mention rules officials at thier beck and call to answer any questions and help the take the best advantage of the rules possible.  While we all generally play the opposite, which are easy (short) courses that are not set up much at all, and have bumpy greens, long rough, and no help finding lost balls, not to mention other inconsistencies through and on the greens. It certainly seems from our perspective that they have little to complain about. But if I hit 10 or 14 approach shots in a round that literally struck the greens (LOL for me, not in this decade!), and more than half of those rolled off said greens.... I’d be beside myself with frustration, no matter the stage or the stakes, but ESPECIALLY in a major championship.  Having said all that, I voted yes because, at the end of the day, big picture.. they are playing the greatest game in the world for a living. And a good living, too for most (all?) of them.  “Course was unfair this week! Only made 55k for the week due to my poor finish!” But I get it. They are human, and it is golf. Whining shall happen.    
    • There is a chance that piece was not designed to be removed.  The adapter sleeve is a black plastic component, so this is a different part.  Does the adapter sleeve fit inside of this piece when it's installed in the hosel?
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. DWB
      (65 years old)
    2. Goldy49
      (69 years old)
    3. joezep23
      (58 years old)
    4. Lukeklaas
      (18 years old)

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...