Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
  • entries
    63
  • comments
    496
  • views
    61,827

I Hate Scrambles


I hate 4-person golf scrambles.

Yes, charities raise a fair amount of money holding these events.  I also appreciate that many non-golfers and bad golfers like the 4-person scramble because there is no pressure to perform.  That’s fine, just don’t call me to round out the team.

I did not always hate 4-person scrambles.  For a while, long ago, I actually liked joining my buddies in these events.  Swing out of my shoes, drink some beer and chill out for 5+ hours.  What was not to like?  Eventually I began to realize what a waste of time these events were.  We weren’t really playing golf.  We were drinking with golf clubs or using the course as a driving range.  My circle of friends did not include any amazingly long-hitting plus handicappers so actually winning an event was pretty much a non-starter. 

The truth is, I am not a proto-typical scramble player.  For starters, I am not long off the tee.  No one includes me on a team for my distance.  I don’t putt incredibly nor am I a laser-like iron player.  I am a grinder.  Any success I have on the course is a result of squeezing the best result from a pretty limited golf game.

A few years back I was the 4th member of a loaded team in a limited-field scramble.  We had a former Asian Tour player who had won on the tour and in the past had made the cut at the British Open.  Another player was a former assistant golf professional.  Rounding the team off was a scratch golfer who had played all over the world.  If I had slipped on the first tee and broken my ankle, our team would have shot the same score with me participating.  At times it was fun watching these guys play.  Five hours of hitting the 4th best shot, however, requires a lot of alcohol.

There are some scramble formats that I find interesting.  The problem with interesting formats, unfortunately, is there are a lot of people unwilling or unable to follow the “rules”.  I happen to like reading and understanding “rules”.  The more complex the game, the better I like it.

The cleverest format I have played involved 4-man teams made up of our club’s membership.  Each team had an “A”, “B” “C” and “D” player, based on the flights in which they had competed during the season.  Each team was given 3 marked “gold” balls.  The team rotated players so each member played at least 4 holes with a “gold” ball.  The other 3 members played a scramble with a regular ball.  At the end of the hole the scramble team wrote down their score and the member playing the “gold” ball wrote down his score (less handicap strokes and subject to a max of “10”). The team score was the total of the scramble score and the net “gold” ball score.  The kicker was that at the end of the day, each team had to have at least 1 “gold” ball left.  It got pretty exciting when your “D” player had to play a hole with lots of trouble and the course had plenty of holes like that.  It became a game of figuring out how to protect (or recover) the “gold” ball while allowing the “D” player to try to score.  Sadly, so many of the teams became hopelessly confused that the format was a bust.

Heading into last September, I had successfully dodged playing in any 4-person scrambles for several years.  Then I got a call from the boss.  He needed a 4th for a charity event in Indiana.  With no way to escape I agreed to fill in the last spot.  As we prepared to tee it up, I was naturally reviewing the instructions.  Men played the “Blue” and women/60+ year old males played the forward tees.  Wait, a second!?!  60+ play the forward tees?  The young lady and I took turns driving par 4’s and setting up the team for iron 2nd shots on the par 5 holes.  Just call me “John Daly.”

You know, maybe scrambles aren’t so bad after all.

 

  • Upvote 2

11 Comments


Recommended Comments

saevel25

Posted

Quote

Eventually I began to realize what a waste of time these events were.  We weren’t really playing golf.  We were drinking with golf clubs or using the course as a driving range.  My circle of friends did not include any amazingly long-hitting plus handicappers so actually winning an event was pretty much a non-starter. 

That isn't a real bad thing ;) 

They are social events. When we played we just tried to see how low we can do as a group. In the end we were just out to have a fun time. 

 

Buckeyebowman

Posted

I don't hate them, but there is one thing that irks me. I have one buddy who, anytime we're on a golf course, all he wants to do is scramble! I finally had to tell him, nicely but firmly, that many times I'd rather play my own ball.

One more thing. Last year this buddy and I were invited to play in a rather high end event at a local country club. It was a "shamble" rather than a "scramble". I'm sure most know what that is. Handicaps were asked for, but nothing had to be verified. Trying to be honest, but having never set foot on this course, I bumped mine up a couple strokes. I needed to double it! I've played Spyglass Hill, and this course is harder! Plus, the winning team shot something like a net 47! Of course every body on the team claimed a 36 handicap! At least we shot an honest 62!

So, if we're invited back next year, I know what I'm doing! It really was a first class event except for the outrageous sandbagging. The best thing was my buddy won the 50/50 raffle for about $800! He came back to the table and handed me my entry fee back! Damn nice of him.

Pete

Posted

8 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

Handicaps were asked for, but nothing had to be verified. Trying to be honest, but having never set foot on this course, I bumped mine up a couple strokes. I needed to double it! I've played Spyglass Hill, and this course is harder! Plus, the winning team shot something like a net 47! Of course every body on the team claimed a 36 handicap! At least we shot an honest 62!

 

I think you meant to say "although I was dishonest about my handicap, some other entrants were more dishonest than me". I feel sorry for the people you beat that gave their actual handicap.

  • Upvote 1
bkuehn1952

Posted

@Buckeyebowman & @Pete  That is another issue with scrambles, the often blatant finagling of handicaps, ages, rules.  If one is the least bit competitive, it is tough to watch what goes on.

Pete

Posted

We play scrambles at our club. The handicaps (being CONGU ones) are reliable. Great fun and no one is suspected of cheating at all.

I wouldn't play in a scramble where entrants declare their own handicaps, especially if 'bumping up a couple of strokes' is considered honest!

Natural Patrick

Posted

I have had fun in almost every scramble I have played in. The cheating that goes on however, I could do without.

Avalanche

Posted

I enjoy playing 2 or 3 scramble events a year.  And I've played in a Tuesday night league for a couple of years that plays various scramble formats.  It's not *real* golf though.  I mean, never a bad lie.  And we're allowed to move the ball up to club length from the original ball.  So, never behind a tree or other obstacle.   

metbid

Posted

We play a few blind draw scrambles at my home course every year, and the groups are based on ghin handicaps with a A,BC,D player mix, which squares the teams fairly.  I really enjoy them because I get to play with people I normally would never get to round with.  P.S. I don't drink, and have rarely seen it to be a problem in the foursomes I've been in.

b101

Posted

Well these scrambles all sound pretty dreadful. I played a great one yesterday as a visitor looking around a course for potential membership. On arrival, everyone picked a card at random from a set of Aces through 8s (three of each card). Everyone played off handicap and as a three-ball with those who'd picked the same card - if you had an ace, you teed off first, then the Kings etc. Of that three ball, the best two scores on each hole counted. A great format and one I really enjoyed as it was always worth playing a lost cause, even if you could only contribute the one point.

Don't get the point of drinking and playing at all. Maybe an American thing? I've yet to see it over here and hopefully won't. The game's difficult enough without that and sandbagging... I'm pleased with my 12 handicap and am hoping to get it down, not up - a handicap should be a source of pride and proof of to what extent you've progressed with your game, not something to be manipulated to win money.

Mop Bucket

Posted (edited)

Yeah I've stopped putting emphasis on winning these events. From my experiences, the hassle of scouting players in order to get together a stacked team is never worth it compared to going out and playing a round with friends or family. Everyone usually gets a door prize or something small and at the end of the day, it is still usually for charity. Even winning doesn't grant all too much satisfaction, as most of the people at these are there just to have a good time and we usually end up giving our winnings back to the cause anyway.

Furthermore, it usually takes a few days for me to get my swing back after scrambles as well. I take pride in being able to hit pretty far off the tee, but in reality, I don't go for a 300+ yard drive every time I step on the box. Swinging out of your shoes and playing aggressive style golf is fun in a scramble format but it usually messes with how I approach shots for at least a round or two afterwards.

Now, I still accept invitations to scrambles, but I go out and play my game and put my focus on having a good time, downing some drinks, and hanging out with friends. I get way more satisfaction from that than trying to take down a stacked team of pros or ringers (there's always at least one). Afterall, these are some of the few events where a team can include my parents or brother who doesn't golf frequently, and still turn out to be incredibly fun.

Edited by Mop Bucket
GolfLug

Posted

The cheating is horrible and childish. I play with no expectation of any serious golf or winning anything except that the money will go to a good cause. If I win a sleeve of balls, a glove or a towel, then it's a bonus. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Blog Entries

  • Posts

    • They weren't necessarily short - I don't remember the exact specifics of all of it, but some of them were missing a little left or right or both. Day 1 they were landing on the edge and kicking on, where day 2 they were just missing and kicking down into the bunkers and did it a lot. I think all told I actually went into bunkers on 8 holes. Some of them were not good shots. Like a few examples, on 8, the pin was in the back. I hit it solidly, but pulled it and it went long, over the bunker into long grass. I had the ball in sandy earth with long grass around it and about a foot below my feet. That next shot I tried to do what I could but it went into the bunker in front of me. Into a footprint. That one I dug out of the footprint, but still in the bunker. Got that one out of the bunker, but into the fringe grass in front of me. Chipped that one on a bit hard and two putts later made a 7. Another was on 14. The flag was on the little finger of green front left. I tried to play a little past it and a little right. Shoved it maybe 10 yards right of where I wanted to and the carry over the bunker gets longer the further right you go and that one hit the grass between the green and the bunker and came back down into the sand, left it in there and didn't get up and down on the next one. I think carrywise it carried about as far as I was planning on it doing so. Another was on 6, leaked my drive a little right into the fairway bunker. Hit a nearly good shot from there that went a little left and a little short and kicked into the bunker front left. That was a strike thing and just a hard shot. Did similar on 18. Drive in the right bunker, slightly heavy second that hit the bank between green and bunker again and kicked back into the sand. I think the tiredness manifested more as not squaring the face up so well and less as slowing down.
    • Depends on how short you were coming up on these shots. A bit more wind? Also, maybe you were swinging at 2-3 mph slower the next day.  I think the biggest thing is not adjusting. Like making assuming your stock shot is not enough and taking 1 club up. Not sure what type of adjustments you were making in your decision making. 
    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.