Jump to content
  • entries
    60
  • comments
    480
  • views
    37,017

I Hate Scrambles


bkuehn1952

6,121 views

I hate 4-person golf scrambles.

Yes, charities raise a fair amount of money holding these events.  I also appreciate that many non-golfers and bad golfers like the 4-person scramble because there is no pressure to perform.  That’s fine, just don’t call me to round out the team.

I did not always hate 4-person scrambles.  For a while, long ago, I actually liked joining my buddies in these events.  Swing out of my shoes, drink some beer and chill out for 5+ hours.  What was not to like?  Eventually I began to realize what a waste of time these events were.  We weren’t really playing golf.  We were drinking with golf clubs or using the course as a driving range.  My circle of friends did not include any amazingly long-hitting plus handicappers so actually winning an event was pretty much a non-starter. 

The truth is, I am not a proto-typical scramble player.  For starters, I am not long off the tee.  No one includes me on a team for my distance.  I don’t putt incredibly nor am I a laser-like iron player.  I am a grinder.  Any success I have on the course is a result of squeezing the best result from a pretty limited golf game.

A few years back I was the 4th member of a loaded team in a limited-field scramble.  We had a former Asian Tour player who had won on the tour and in the past had made the cut at the British Open.  Another player was a former assistant golf professional.  Rounding the team off was a scratch golfer who had played all over the world.  If I had slipped on the first tee and broken my ankle, our team would have shot the same score with me participating.  At times it was fun watching these guys play.  Five hours of hitting the 4th best shot, however, requires a lot of alcohol.

There are some scramble formats that I find interesting.  The problem with interesting formats, unfortunately, is there are a lot of people unwilling or unable to follow the “rules”.  I happen to like reading and understanding “rules”.  The more complex the game, the better I like it.

The cleverest format I have played involved 4-man teams made up of our club’s membership.  Each team had an “A”, “B” “C” and “D” player, based on the flights in which they had competed during the season.  Each team was given 3 marked “gold” balls.  The team rotated players so each member played at least 4 holes with a “gold” ball.  The other 3 members played a scramble with a regular ball.  At the end of the hole the scramble team wrote down their score and the member playing the “gold” ball wrote down his score (less handicap strokes and subject to a max of “10”). The team score was the total of the scramble score and the net “gold” ball score.  The kicker was that at the end of the day, each team had to have at least 1 “gold” ball left.  It got pretty exciting when your “D” player had to play a hole with lots of trouble and the course had plenty of holes like that.  It became a game of figuring out how to protect (or recover) the “gold” ball while allowing the “D” player to try to score.  Sadly, so many of the teams became hopelessly confused that the format was a bust.

Heading into last September, I had successfully dodged playing in any 4-person scrambles for several years.  Then I got a call from the boss.  He needed a 4th for a charity event in Indiana.  With no way to escape I agreed to fill in the last spot.  As we prepared to tee it up, I was naturally reviewing the instructions.  Men played the “Blue” and women/60+ year old males played the forward tees.  Wait, a second!?!  60+ play the forward tees?  The young lady and I took turns driving par 4’s and setting up the team for iron 2nd shots on the par 5 holes.  Just call me “John Daly.”

You know, maybe scrambles aren’t so bad after all.

 

11 Comments


Recommended Comments

Quote

Eventually I began to realize what a waste of time these events were.  We weren’t really playing golf.  We were drinking with golf clubs or using the course as a driving range.  My circle of friends did not include any amazingly long-hitting plus handicappers so actually winning an event was pretty much a non-starter. 

That isn't a real bad thing ;) 

They are social events. When we played we just tried to see how low we can do as a group. In the end we were just out to have a fun time. 

 

Link to comment

I don't hate them, but there is one thing that irks me. I have one buddy who, anytime we're on a golf course, all he wants to do is scramble! I finally had to tell him, nicely but firmly, that many times I'd rather play my own ball.

One more thing. Last year this buddy and I were invited to play in a rather high end event at a local country club. It was a "shamble" rather than a "scramble". I'm sure most know what that is. Handicaps were asked for, but nothing had to be verified. Trying to be honest, but having never set foot on this course, I bumped mine up a couple strokes. I needed to double it! I've played Spyglass Hill, and this course is harder! Plus, the winning team shot something like a net 47! Of course every body on the team claimed a 36 handicap! At least we shot an honest 62!

So, if we're invited back next year, I know what I'm doing! It really was a first class event except for the outrageous sandbagging. The best thing was my buddy won the 50/50 raffle for about $800! He came back to the table and handed me my entry fee back! Damn nice of him.

Link to comment
8 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

Handicaps were asked for, but nothing had to be verified. Trying to be honest, but having never set foot on this course, I bumped mine up a couple strokes. I needed to double it! I've played Spyglass Hill, and this course is harder! Plus, the winning team shot something like a net 47! Of course every body on the team claimed a 36 handicap! At least we shot an honest 62!

 

I think you meant to say "although I was dishonest about my handicap, some other entrants were more dishonest than me". I feel sorry for the people you beat that gave their actual handicap.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment

We play scrambles at our club. The handicaps (being CONGU ones) are reliable. Great fun and no one is suspected of cheating at all.

I wouldn't play in a scramble where entrants declare their own handicaps, especially if 'bumping up a couple of strokes' is considered honest!

Link to comment

I enjoy playing 2 or 3 scramble events a year.  And I've played in a Tuesday night league for a couple of years that plays various scramble formats.  It's not *real* golf though.  I mean, never a bad lie.  And we're allowed to move the ball up to club length from the original ball.  So, never behind a tree or other obstacle.   

Link to comment

We play a few blind draw scrambles at my home course every year, and the groups are based on ghin handicaps with a A,BC,D player mix, which squares the teams fairly.  I really enjoy them because I get to play with people I normally would never get to round with.  P.S. I don't drink, and have rarely seen it to be a problem in the foursomes I've been in.

Link to comment

Well these scrambles all sound pretty dreadful. I played a great one yesterday as a visitor looking around a course for potential membership. On arrival, everyone picked a card at random from a set of Aces through 8s (three of each card). Everyone played off handicap and as a three-ball with those who'd picked the same card - if you had an ace, you teed off first, then the Kings etc. Of that three ball, the best two scores on each hole counted. A great format and one I really enjoyed as it was always worth playing a lost cause, even if you could only contribute the one point.

Don't get the point of drinking and playing at all. Maybe an American thing? I've yet to see it over here and hopefully won't. The game's difficult enough without that and sandbagging... I'm pleased with my 12 handicap and am hoping to get it down, not up - a handicap should be a source of pride and proof of to what extent you've progressed with your game, not something to be manipulated to win money.

Link to comment

Yeah I've stopped putting emphasis on winning these events. From my experiences, the hassle of scouting players in order to get together a stacked team is never worth it compared to going out and playing a round with friends or family. Everyone usually gets a door prize or something small and at the end of the day, it is still usually for charity. Even winning doesn't grant all too much satisfaction, as most of the people at these are there just to have a good time and we usually end up giving our winnings back to the cause anyway.

Furthermore, it usually takes a few days for me to get my swing back after scrambles as well. I take pride in being able to hit pretty far off the tee, but in reality, I don't go for a 300+ yard drive every time I step on the box. Swinging out of your shoes and playing aggressive style golf is fun in a scramble format but it usually messes with how I approach shots for at least a round or two afterwards.

Now, I still accept invitations to scrambles, but I go out and play my game and put my focus on having a good time, downing some drinks, and hanging out with friends. I get way more satisfaction from that than trying to take down a stacked team of pros or ringers (there's always at least one). Afterall, these are some of the few events where a team can include my parents or brother who doesn't golf frequently, and still turn out to be incredibly fun.

Edited by Mop Bucket
Link to comment

The cheating is horrible and childish. I play with no expectation of any serious golf or winning anything except that the money will go to a good cause. If I win a sleeve of balls, a glove or a towel, then it's a bonus. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Popular Now

  • Blog Entries

  • Posts

    • https://static1.squarespace.com/static/603d222df4a6a57df7ef3e29/t/663cdba5d89e3a1848dab8d1/1715264422455/US_DIS_ILND_1_24cv3749_d34676497e293_COMPLAINT_filed_by_SuperSpeed_Golf_LLC_Jury_Demand.pdf The full complaint is there, but  basically, SuperSpeed (SS*) is claiming the Stack System (SS*) Stack System’s [sic] produces inflated metrics later used to, [sic] mislead and deceive consumers. Stack System’s marketing materials inflate apparent swing speed and distance gains through selective presentment of data without qualification that purported gains are not the result, in whole or part, of its training protocol and products. * Yes, I'm joking about abbreviating both "SS." SuperSpeed wants: A judgment that the Stack System has disseminated false and/or misleading information in violation of federal and Illinois law. The deletion of all false advertising distributed and recall of all packaging containing false advertising and a requirement that Stack System issue notices (written or otherwise) to that effect to all current distributors and retailers of its products and all distributors with whom Stack System has done business in the past eighteen months. Written confirmation within 30 days of an injunction detailing the manner and form in which Stack System has complied. An order that Stack System disseminate corrective advertising informing consumers, the trade, and the public of Stack System’s unlawful conduct. 3X all profits received by Stack System as a result of its unlawful actions. 3X all damages sustained by SuperSpeed (as a result of Stack System’s actions) The cost of the action All reasonable attorney fees All other relief to which SuperSpeed are entitled and such other or additional relief as just and proper. Oy.
    • I'm not doing this for the hundred and twentieth time. Sorry in advance, but you get the massively abridged version. Those guys also benefited from the weaker/shallower fields. Also, Watson's career doesn't overlap with Jack's like many think it did. Tom is nearly a decade younger. Jack won only like four majors only after Tom won his first. And Tom won more British Opens than he did all three of the other majors combined, as it was his specialty (not Jack's). Arnie's career similarly doesn't overlap Jack's as much as many think.   Jack would also tell you Tiger was the better golfer.
    • Weaker depth of fields for sure. Some of the top level guys with Jack were pretty awesome. Tom Watson had the lead on the 72nd hole of the 2009 British Open, an event where Tiger missed the cut. Old Tom was almost 60 years old. Jack himself at age 58 finished Top 10 at The 1998 Masters and scored better than Tiger, who won The Masters by 12 shots just a year before that.   The success of both Tom & Jack in older age gives some hope that maybe Tiger can find the magic again at some point. He’s still trying to figure out how to build the stamina for 72 holes after the leg injury. I would love to see him jump on the leaderboard in the coming years. I know a lot of people have given up on him at this point, but that was also true from 2014 to 2017 with the back injuries. He had a hell of a resurgence in 2018 & 2019. Would be fun to see it again. 
    • Perceptive rules question by caddie unlocks Tour pro’s ‘dead zone’ relief A perceptive rules question by Xander Schauffele’s caddie, Austin Kaiser, unlocked “dead zone” relief during the Wells Fargo Championship.
    • I ran across an interesting new clip, Johnson Wagner went into that spot with the Referee who allowed the relief.  Apparently there was a perfectly reasonable shot to be made, as Johnson clearly demonstrated, so relief from the TIO was perfectly appropriate.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...