I Hate Scrambles
I hate 4-person golf scrambles.
Yes, charities raise a fair amount of money holding these events. I also appreciate that many non-golfers and bad golfers like the 4-person scramble because there is no pressure to perform. That’s fine, just don’t call me to round out the team.
I did not always hate 4-person scrambles. For a while, long ago, I actually liked joining my buddies in these events. Swing out of my shoes, drink some beer and chill out for 5+ hours. What was not to like? Eventually I began to realize what a waste of time these events were. We weren’t really playing golf. We were drinking with golf clubs or using the course as a driving range. My circle of friends did not include any amazingly long-hitting plus handicappers so actually winning an event was pretty much a non-starter.
The truth is, I am not a proto-typical scramble player. For starters, I am not long off the tee. No one includes me on a team for my distance. I don’t putt incredibly nor am I a laser-like iron player. I am a grinder. Any success I have on the course is a result of squeezing the best result from a pretty limited golf game.
A few years back I was the 4th member of a loaded team in a limited-field scramble. We had a former Asian Tour player who had won on the tour and in the past had made the cut at the British Open. Another player was a former assistant golf professional. Rounding the team off was a scratch golfer who had played all over the world. If I had slipped on the first tee and broken my ankle, our team would have shot the same score with me participating. At times it was fun watching these guys play. Five hours of hitting the 4th best shot, however, requires a lot of alcohol.
There are some scramble formats that I find interesting. The problem with interesting formats, unfortunately, is there are a lot of people unwilling or unable to follow the “rules”. I happen to like reading and understanding “rules”. The more complex the game, the better I like it.
The cleverest format I have played involved 4-man teams made up of our club’s membership. Each team had an “A”, “B” “C” and “D” player, based on the flights in which they had competed during the season. Each team was given 3 marked “gold” balls. The team rotated players so each member played at least 4 holes with a “gold” ball. The other 3 members played a scramble with a regular ball. At the end of the hole the scramble team wrote down their score and the member playing the “gold” ball wrote down his score (less handicap strokes and subject to a max of “10”). The team score was the total of the scramble score and the net “gold” ball score. The kicker was that at the end of the day, each team had to have at least 1 “gold” ball left. It got pretty exciting when your “D” player had to play a hole with lots of trouble and the course had plenty of holes like that. It became a game of figuring out how to protect (or recover) the “gold” ball while allowing the “D” player to try to score. Sadly, so many of the teams became hopelessly confused that the format was a bust.
Heading into last September, I had successfully dodged playing in any 4-person scrambles for several years. Then I got a call from the boss. He needed a 4th for a charity event in Indiana. With no way to escape I agreed to fill in the last spot. As we prepared to tee it up, I was naturally reviewing the instructions. Men played the “Blue” and women/60+ year old males played the forward tees. Wait, a second!?! 60+ play the forward tees? The young lady and I took turns driving par 4’s and setting up the team for iron 2nd shots on the par 5 holes. Just call me “John Daly.”
You know, maybe scrambles aren’t so bad after all.
11 Comments
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now