Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Comparison Between Nines/Course At Your Home Club


Note: This thread is 2153 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

What’s the difference, in yardage/par/difficulty, of the nines (or courses if you normally play at a club with more than 18 holes) at your home club? For me, I play at a standard 36-36 course. There’s a pretty good yardage difference between the two nines though. The front nine is 3099/2910, and the back is 3343/3153, from the blues and whites respectively. The difficulty is amped up on the back as well. The back nine is much more narrow than the front, and there’s OB on both sides of the fairway on every single hole compared to only one side OB on all but two holes on the front. And the OB is much closer to the fairway. If you miss the fairway by 40 feet on the front, you’re probably gonna be fine. You can miss by maybe half that on the back, except in a few spots. In a typical round, I’ll score two to four strokes worse on the back than the front.

Edited by dagolfer18

WITB:
Woods: Cleveland Launcher (Driver, 17 degree, 22 degree)
Irons: Titleist T200 (4-PW)
Wedges: Callaway Jaws (50/54/60)
Putter: Odyssey White Hot

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The front nine is shorter at my home course(s), but tougher. I'm usually between 4-8 strokes lower on the back nine of either even though thats the 36 side on both. There is only 1 par 5 on the front of each. 

  • :titleist: 917 D2 9.5o EvenFlow blue shaft    :titleist: 917 F2 15o EvenFlow blue shaft    
  • :titleist: 818 H2 19o EvenFlow blue shaft 
  • :titleist: 712 AP2 4-PW
  • :vokey: 52/8o SM6 RAW    56/14o SM6 Chrome      60/4o SM6 Chrome
  • :ping: Anser Sigma G putter
  • :snell: MTB-Black Balls
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

On the course I cut my teeth on in NJ, the course rating for the front 9 was essentially par but the course rating for the back 9 was a stroke under par - that doesn't really tell the story.  The 9th hole was the easiest hole on the course and the 8th was a short par really wasn't that difficult relative to others, so what you really had was a very tough seven hole opening stretch that was much easier the rest of the way.  Several times I would be +6 or +7 over par after 7 holes and then go even par or +1 the rest of the way.  At least once I was even under par the last 11 holes.  In some regards it was a good learning experience - never give up the round can turn around - and it some ways it was really frustrating - if your game was really off it was hard to correct until the back 9.


Posted
19 minutes ago, gbogey said:

On the course I cut my teeth on in NJ, the course rating for the front 9 was essentially par but the course rating for the back 9 was a stroke under par - that doesn't really tell the story.  The 9th hole was the easiest hole on the course and the 8th was a short par really wasn't that difficult relative to others, so what you really had was a very tough seven hole opening stretch that was much easier the rest of the way.  Several times I would be +6 or +7 over par after 7 holes and then go even par or +1 the rest of the way.  At least once I was even under par the last 11 holes.  In some regards it was a good learning experience - never give up the round can turn around - and it some ways it was really frustrating - if your game was really off it was hard to correct until the back 9.

My home club has five really difficult holes, and thirteen easier holes. Here’s how I organize my course, based on my game:

Holes 1-5: A difficult opening stretch with two hard holes, and three moderately difficult holes, a stroke or two over bogey golf isn’t too bad.

Holes 6-12: If I lost some strokes to bogey on the first five holes, this seven-hole stretch is an opportunity to score and get my round back on track before the last third of the course.

Holes 13-15: This is my home course’s version of “Amen Corner”. Three difficult par-4s where prices for missing are high. If I can get through this stretch in +4, I’m happy.

Holes 16-18: Three moderately difficult (and fun) holes to finish off the round, including what I think is the signature hole, the 160-yard 18th over water.

More info on my home club, if you want it, can be found in my other thread, “Hole-By-Hole Of Your Home Course”.

WITB:
Woods: Cleveland Launcher (Driver, 17 degree, 22 degree)
Irons: Titleist T200 (4-PW)
Wedges: Callaway Jaws (50/54/60)
Putter: Odyssey White Hot

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The front nine are a little easier. Same distance. My average is half a stroke more in the back 9. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My home course is standard 36-36, without a whole lot of variation between the front and back. What makes it different is that we have 5 par 3s & 5 par 5s.

my get up and go musta got up and went..
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2153 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.