Jump to content
IGNORED

Let's Toughen These Courses Up for the Pros


Rick Graham
Note: This thread is 1375 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, klineka said:

Palmer had that chance though, he didn't execute and Rahm did. Had Palmer made that putt on 16 and not bogeyed 17 and Rahm not gotten up and down on either 17 or 18 they would have been tied.

Everyone probably has slightly different things they look at, but I look at performance/results in tournaments against similar fields and then a number of strokes gained statistics to compare players (when comparing players right now, it changes slightly when comparing them over their careers)

I agree with having to use different metrics when judging current vs career because there are current players that are playing well while better career golfers are not. Yes they could have been tied and yes Palmer had a chance as did other golfers when the round started. My statement was more in general than for this specific tourney. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


What I find really boring is showing only the great shots. The Masters is usually much better since you can watch all the shots on Amen corner, etc.

If you watch the old Wonderful World of Golf on Youtube you can see some great golf and pro's in big trouble

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I happen to live close to Torrey Pines which is a great bargain for those of us with a city card.  I play the North course with the Monday to Thursday senior rate of $31.

Torrey's pretty reasonable for us mid handicappers.  But for the pros, it's really tough.

Most ot the year it's a really fun course to play and the rough is cut down.  But, from mid October to mid February they have narrow fairways and the rough is high.  During that time they have a local rule that you can only look for your ball in the rough for 1 minute and then it's a free drop in the rough where you think the ball would be.  About half the time I can't find my ball.  Then for me it's a hack-it-out with a sand wedge.  I'd rather all that rough would just be water so I could just take a penalty and drop in the fairway.  It's really not very much fun, at least not for me and most people I know.  Typically, we play it once in October and then say, "not playing here again until they cut down the rough".  I wish they wouldn't take out 4 months of the year with tournament height rough.  Not sure why they do that.

The pros make it look relatively easy though.  But the course setup is tough.

The course rating from the green tees (3rd from the back) of 71.2/122 seems about right to me given the rough is cut shorter.  When the rough is up, for me it plays at least 10 strokes harder.  I'm guessing they rate the course based on the rough being cut shorter.

Edited by No Mulligans
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1375 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I honestly believe if they play longer tees by 300-400 yards, closer to or over 7,000 yards, more rough, tougher greens, women's golf will become much more gripping.  BTW, if it weren't for Scottie killing it right now, men's golf isn't exactly compelling.
    • Day 542, April 26, 2024 A lesson no-show, no-called (he had the wrong time even though the last text was confirming the time… 😛), so I used 45 minutes or so of that time to get some good work in.
    • Yeah, that. It stands out… because it's so rare. And interest in Caitlin Clark will likely result in a very small bump to the WNBA or something… and then it will go back down to very low viewership numbers. Like it's always had. A small portion, yep. It doesn't help that she lost, either. Girls often don't even want to watch women playing sports. My daughter golfs… I watch more LPGA Tour golf than she does, and it's not even close. I watch more LPGA Tour golf than PGA Tour golf, even. She watches very little of either. It's just the way it is. Yes, it's a bit of a vicious cycle, but… how do you break it? If you invest a ton of money into broadcasting an LPGA Tour event, the same coverage you'd spend on a men's event… you'll lose a ton of money. It'd take decades to build up the interest. Even with interest in the PGA Tour declining.
    • Oh yea, now I remember reading about you on TMZ!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...