Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1978 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted

I’ll try to make a long story short.

Kevin Kirk talked about the idea of a “neural deficit” at the PGA Magazine Teacher of the Year conference.

He was working with his Tour guys and would find that they’d hit a wall after a few weeks on Tour and just have a hard time performing even slightly below average.

For example, let’s suppose your “capacity” to perform goes to 100. You get to a course on Monday, play a practice round, practice a bit after, etc. Plus travel, etc. It wears on you, and you deplete your capacity to 20. You sleep, and the next day, it’s 95. But you put in a full day, and deplete it down to 10. You recover to 85, and play the pro-am Wednesday, which involves being social and playing 18 holes, plus you practice a bit again. You’re down to 0, but recover to 75 or 80 to play the Thursday round.

This goes on for a few weeks, and eventually you’re starting the day at 25 or something, depleting yourself down to -40 or something during the day, and having a harder and harder time recovering.

In talking with some people about this, he learned that some scientists were conducting studies on people with heart rate monitors, except they weren’t measuring heart rates, but HRV. Heart Rate Variability.

The scientists found a few things (I’m being very general here):

  • Going past five hours with anything approaching intense focus can pretty quickly put you at a neural deficit.
  • Rest is restorative, but if you run up too much of a neural deficit, it takes several days of rest to really recover.
  • Many of us will work 7-10 hours per day, then deal with the stresses of life, family, bills, workouts, etc. This can tax you.
  • Stresses, both physical and mental/emotional, add strain to your system.

Patrick Reed, for example, will take this pretty seriously. He’ll cap his work day at five hours or so. Often, Thu-Sun, that’s warmup, a round, and then little else. He tries to relax the rest of the time.

On days when he’s home, he’ll schedule his five hours out to the minute, almost never exceeding five hours.

If you’re searching “neural deficit” you’ll find more severe symptoms, but this is what you might call “functional neural deficits” because you’re not literally having severe nervous system malfunctions. You just… can’t think quite as clearly, make the best golf swings, etc.

Whoop measures and tracks your strain, recovery, and sleep, and uses HRV as a cornerstone of this. I recommend checking it out (https://join.whoop.com/iacas for a deal). And join us in this topic, then.

This topic isn’t about the Whoop, though, but more the general talk of neural deficits, strain, recovery, etc.

Takeaway: consider your neural load on any given day. You can push yourself a little hard for a day or two or three in a row, but rest and recovery is important after that.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

All of that makes sense and fits in with what I think most people feel during the week. Let's say they get a pretty relaxing weekend. They work 5 full days of work and don't get much downtime. On Friday, they are struggling to do any optimal work at all. I feel like this is a common narrative for most people. 

I always found that if I could get 6 hours of high productive work done in a day, then I did good. Some days I can do more, and others I do less. Then there is time when I am doing very low focus work, like answering emails and doing other tasks that I can kinda just breeze through. I try to prioritize my work with how I feel. If I feel good, I will take on stuff that needs more of focus. If I am dragging, then I will find some easier stuff to work on. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Here is a real life example, from the end of my first year in graduate school.  There was a two day exam which you had to pass to continue on in the program.  You fail, and no matter what your grades were the first year, you were out... in my Masters degree or anything to put on your resume.

So a friend and I went into study mode for two and one half weeks before the exam.  We would study those two weeks and then rest up for the exam.  We began at about 7 a.m. and ended each day about 8 p.m.  We lived on coffee and his wife's great cooking... we focused and focused and focused.

To break up the day when walked about a block away to a church parking lot which had a basketball hoop.  He and I were pretty decent ballers, and on the first day we shot 3s, and 2s and did some layups.  Played HORSE.  We did this every day.  By the end of the second week, we could barely make a lay-up.

So I can understand how these guys get beat up...

We were mentally and neurologically at a deficit.    We rested up for three days, and both passed the exam with ease, one of us got the highest score of the 32 who took it, the other finished 3rd.  Yes I will brag I got the highest score that had been recorded in the history of that exam.  

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1978 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • It was worse than that.  Under 10 course handicap I think was NDB, but 10-19 CH had a maximum score, and 20-29 had a higher one (by one).  Might have been 7 and 8, I'm going from memory here.  When my handicap was low 20s / high teens, I had to look up  my course handicap every time I had a bad hole and adjust before I posted the number.  Now there's maybe one hole per course where that might be an issue, and I have the option to enter hole-by-hole in the GHIN app anyway if I have any doubts.   I remember reading a lot of Dean Knuth's writing 15-20 years ago, when I was starting in golf.  I liked the history of the (old?) handicapping system.  I really like the changes WHS brings with par.  I suppose I'm sorry he doesn't seem to like that change, I thought it solved a problem that had been irking me. 
    • Wordle 1,811 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Couple of things. In the UK they play a lot of stableford competitions. 2 points for a net par, 1 for a bogey, 3 for a birdie, 4 for an eagle, 0 for a double bogey or worse. Playing to your handicap typically means getting 36 points, being 18 x 2 points. If your course rating is a long way different from par, then playing to your handicap would mean getting 32 points or 40 points or some such. I wouldn't be at all surprised if that input from the R&A is the reason for the CR-Par adjustment, which brings it to 36 points is playing to your handicap. A round of net pars really should be playing to your handicap. Now it is. Yay. I would think the people most likely to be upset about the CR-Par adjustment would be 6 or 7 indexes whose course is par 72, with a 74/140 rating. 6.5 x 140/113 + 74 - 72 = 10. So the "single figure" golfer who has probably defined himself that way for a long time is now a 10 and getting double digit strokes. Oof. I must admit I'm a 0.0 right now (sure makes the math easy) and if I play Bethpage Black from the blues, suddenly I'm a 7. That takes a little bit of getting used to. It also means I do have to pay attention to the stroke indices to be sure of whether I'm making the net double bogey adjustment properly.  I do think it's much less likely that NDB is applied properly vs the old system where it was max double bogey or max 7 depending on handicap (I think anyway - I know it was max double bogey at my handicap level - I didn't much care about where it changed or what it changed to). NDB is clearly better, but it does mean people either have to adjust it themselves accurately (questionable) or input their hole by hole scores (also questionable). I do it, because I care about it (and don't tend to make too many scores worse than double and also rarely play courses where I'm giving strokes back to the course and would therefore have max bogey on some holes). I'm sure there are many who don't and will just guess or assume. Under the old system, if I was playing a scratch tournament (which is most of my golf), I didn't care what my course handicap or stroke allocations were. They didn't affect my posted scores at all. Now they do (although the MGA and LIGA post all scores at their events themselves directly - something I am very happy about). That is a complication under the new system - one I think is worth it given the benefits, but a complication all the same.
    • Wordle 1,811 4/6 ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Good analogy Stinky 😜
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.