Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1580 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I change my own grips often. I find it easier and more convenient than taking them to a shop. I changed the grips on my wife’s clubs. She recently took a lesson where the instructor told her the grips are not aligned correctly. I already knew that but I don’t pay any attention to the alignment of a grip when I put it on. I don’t see the point of it. Do people actually look at the grip to see how to place their hands on it?  Some grips don’t even have any markings on them. I don’t see the importance of lining up the grip with the face square and then using that to make sure your grip is correct. Any thoughts on this ?


Posted
Just now, Mkgrady said:

Do people actually look at the grip to see how to place their hands on it?  Some grips don’t even have any markings on them. I don’t see the importance of lining up the grip with the face square and then using that to make sure your grip is correct. Any thoughts on this ?

1) Grips with a noticeable spine to them
2) Grips with labels, I like mine turned upside down
3) Maybe grips that with different textures for the top and bottom hand that are not uniform depending on alignment
4) putter grips with a flat side

For the most part, I never bothered with alignment of the grip outside of not having the logo facing up. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I personally prefer grips with alignment marks set with the club face square. I think it helps me to ensure that I have my hands in the same config each time. That said, it's been so long since my grips were aligned that way that I've learned to ignore the grip markings. I suppose that grip alignment, like ball choice, is very much a subjective thing.


Posted

It does bother me a little but the advent of adjustable hosels has got me used to it.  I use Tour Velvet grips to minimize it. Tour velvet is not a “busy” looking grip like a GP  MCC either.

I was giving a lesson last night and the student just got a set of irons and had Golf Galaxy put midsize MCC grips on them.  They are all over the place.  It’s like Helen Keller did them.  I noticed it right away, I didn’t say anything to the student about it because it didn’t affect anything and he was happy with the clubs.
 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
9 hours ago, Mkgrady said:

Do people actually look at the grip to see how to place their hands on it?

I do to some degree especially when I’m gripping down for a shot. But it doesn’t matter to me whether markings are up or down. I look more at the head when I grip the club.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I do my own clubs and a few sets a year for others. I prefer the logo or whatever upside down, it just serves as a distraction.  When people want them logo up I'll put masking tape on the shaft  below the grip I'm removing and mark where the alignment is using a straight edge and fine point pen. That way they will notice no alignment difference between the new and old grips.

  • Thumbs Up 1

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I do not like grips with lines on them for this reason.  My favorite grip is the golfpride 360 with no marks or lines on it.  If you end up making adjustments to your club by lofting up/down then those alignment marks get changed but that would only really pertain to the woods or adjustable hybrids.  


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Grip alignment works well for me to reinforce what I am seeing at the club face.  Golf has so many little subtleties that can affect results in a big way.  Every little bit of reinforcement helps imho.  If the grips have markings, I set them up in a way that reinforces to my eye that I am setting up and gripping in the position that I want. 


Note: This thread is 1580 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 22 - 2026-01-11 More mirror work. Back outdoors tomorrow.
    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.