Jump to content
Note: This thread is 1079 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

I have 61 swings (29 drivers, 32 irons (two of which are wedges) with full club and body data of men and women Tour players (or former Tour players) in my GEARS system. I've put some of the data from all of them in a spreadsheet and with that, I can plot a number of things against each other. I'm open to soliciting and creating charts that show you any of the data.

In each of these topics, I'll present the data in a chart of some kind and share the data in the quartiles (min, 25th, average, 75th, max) as well as the standard deviation.

Here's the chart for a selection of the players in the database with irons and driver:

trail_elbow_vs_adduction.jpg

 

GEARS measures the lead arm adduction as the angle at the lead shoulder joint to the next segment out in each direction: the lead elbow and the spine. Shoulder retraction and protraction as well as of course the internal and external movement of the upper arm can affect this number.

GEARS measures the elbow bend as the bend of the trail elbow joint, with 0° being a straight or fully extended trail elbow and 90° being an elbow that's bent 90°. You cannot achieve 180° of bend, as the angle is the BEND angle, not the absolute angle. So an arm that is bent 110° will be bent 30° more than an elbow that's bent 80°.

The charts below show the independent min, max, quartiles, etc. at each position.

Irons

            Elbow Bend     Adduction
Low            55.49         42.37
25th           77.60         56.62
Avg.           90.93         61.90
75th          104.24         68.49
High          121.75         80.21
Range          66.26         37.84
Std.Dev.       17.60          9.04

Drivers

            Elbow Bend     Adduction
Low            65.13         40.35
25th           83.63         51.36
Avg.           98.58         57.87
75th          113.43         65.77
High          125.24         74.08
Range          60.11         33.73
Std.Dev.       16.44          8.79

If you'd like to request some processed GEARS data, please send me a DM.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Curious what your thoughts are on this @iacas - the impression I get is that the range of both factors is very high - so high as to suggest that there is no "right" place for your arms to be in at this stage (A4 is top of backswing?). Right arm can range from 60 to 110* of bend and left arm (rightie golfer) can be anywhere from 40* to 80* adducted (I think this means across the chest). I guess I'm not sure if 90 means straight out or tight across the chest. I would think straight out because 80* would be so far across the chest as to be unworkable otherwise. Only real meaningful thing from it is the more bent your right arm is, the further across your chest your left arm has to be. It seems anatomically it would be difficult to have much otherwise unless your left arm is also bent at the elbow.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

Both of the numbers are explained in the post, @Ty_Webb.

  On 3/10/2022 at 1:58 AM, iacas said:

GEARS measures the lead arm adduction as the angle at the lead shoulder joint to the next segment out in each direction: the lead elbow and the spine. Shoulder retraction and protraction as well as of course the internal and external movement of the upper arm can affect this number.

GEARS measures the elbow bend as the bend of the trail elbow joint, with 0° being a straight or fully extended trail elbow and 90° being an elbow that's bent 90°. You cannot achieve 180° of bend, as the angle is the BEND angle, not the absolute angle. So an arm that is bent 110° will be bent 30° more than an elbow that's bent 80°.

Expand  

And I think you'll notice that not many are below 50° or 55° adduction, with those also tending to be the higher elbow bend players.

Trail elbow height would influence the elbow bend vs. adduction stuff, too.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

How do these numbers relate to the depth/height of the backswing at A4? For example, if my swing got too flat, would the adduction be a smaller and and the elbow bend less? The chart trend seems to suggest adduction and elbow bend go that way.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
  On 3/10/2022 at 11:46 AM, boogielicious said:

How do these numbers relate to the depth/height of the backswing at A4?

Expand  

They… don't?

I think you understand what these measurements represent, so if you picture bending your right elbow 90°, I think you can picture how you can still move that in space in two directions:

  • Up and down (vertically).
  • Around beside you or more in front of you.

The latter would affect the adduction and the depth, the former wouldn't do much to affect the adduction.

The adduction is just basically how large the angle between your lead pec and lead upper arm is. So you can move your left (lead) arm up and down and not affect the depth or the adduction much.

  On 3/10/2022 at 11:46 AM, boogielicious said:

For example, if my swing got too flat

Expand  

We're talking about your left arm being lower (= "flatter") from the DL view here? I'll assume that in answering…

  On 3/10/2022 at 11:46 AM, boogielicious said:

For example, if my swing got too flat, would the adduction be a smaller and and the elbow bend less?

Expand  

The adduction angle is the actual angle, so the closer your left arm is to your chest, the smaller the angle and the "more adduction" you've done.

Basically, your left arm hanging straight down is 90° adduction. Lift it up horizontal, still 90°. Move it 45° to the right, and it's 45°. So keeping your right elbow down at your side and bending it a bunch tends to pull the left arm across your chest.

Interesting thing though: if you bend your left elbow too, your adduction angle can stay wide even though your hands get pulled around, because the adduction angle is just measured to the elbow. Elbow to shoulder to spine, that's the angle.

  On 3/10/2022 at 11:46 AM, boogielicious said:

The chart trend seems to suggest adduction and elbow bend go that way.

Expand  

More elbow bend tends to lead to more adduction.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Got it thanks. I’m working to understand all the data terms so it will be easier when I come for my session.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
  On 3/10/2022 at 2:00 PM, boogielicious said:

Got it thanks. I’m working to understand all the data terms so it will be easier when I come for my session.

Expand  

The visuals help.

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Informative 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1079 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I am not sure that's the announcers - that's more the producers. It's like the "oh and we're going to cut over to Joe Schmoe here who has a 90 foot putt for eagle on 7. He's +12 for the tournament, let's see what happens", gee I wonder. But they do cut around and show the putts that go in or the shots that go close.  One of my favorite announcers is Ken Brown. He played to a high standard and he's quite engaging too. Good combination. He is always talking about how difficult a shot the guy is about to play is. Player has a chip over a ridge and he'll say something along the lines of "this is such a difficult shot - if he can get this within 15 feet of the hole he's doing very well". Then they chip it to a foot and he starts gushing. That's almost the opposite. But it does add some excitement, especially if you don't know how hard the shot is, which, let's face it, is pretty tough to tell on television.  There are though definitely some (Miller was pretty "good" at this) who will create unreasonable expectations. Like "he'll be pretty upset if he doesn't get this inside 10 feet" from 100 yards away. On a somewhat separate note, that's why I always quite enjoyed it when they showed every shot Tiger hit. Gave you a much better idea of how the game is actually played. You could watch him some days and he'd do literally nothing spectacular all day, but you add it up and he's shot 67 and you question how he did it. Well, he did it by hitting almost all the greens, making birdies on the par 5s and holing a couple of 8 foot putts on the better approach shots.
    • It's not Scottie's fault the announcers keep saying that about him, that seems like a silly reason to root for someone else IMO.    I think announcers have at least somewhat of a role in giving amateur golfers unrealistic expectations for what a good shot is. They act like PGA Tour players should make every 8 foot putt and hit it inside 5 feet from 100yds when in reality they only make just over 50% of their 8 footers and tour average from 100yds is around 20 feet.
    • Touche'. Fair point. 
    • I used to find commentators really obnoxious like this, then I watched one of the online streams of the Masters (I think it was amen corner) that had someone commentating on it, but they were literally just stating the name of the player about to hit and their score and other drab stuff. It was so bland I couldn't watch it. Worse than nothing, but I did want to know some of the stuff they were talking about, which is something of a catch-22. I did realize that the commentary team have a pretty rough time of it and do a hard job and some of them do it better than you might realize. 
    • Okay, this is my opinion. But you really should consider getting data. No offense but human memory can be odd. Sometimes we make a long putt early on with our new putter and from that first impression onward you have a "putter that's good for long putts." We may miss our first two short ones and now you have "A putter that doesn't work for short putts". Sometimes these things even out over time, sometimes they don't, but it's often tough to break our first impressions of what's happening.  Plus, let's say that in fact it is true. You putt better from long distance with a broomstick and better from close up with a standard putter. Which one holds more weight? Here's an example. If your short putting is -5 SG (Strokes Gained) and your long putting is +5 SG does that mean your over all putting is 0 SG? What if your overall putting with one putter is -2 SG and +2 SG with the other putter? The answer to which putter should you use is of course is "It depends". BUT.... If you had SG (strokes gained) data for both putters you would know right away which putter is better for you. Or at least you'd have a better idea. This still doesn't take into account the difficulty of where you are playing, and/or the particular days in which you play. We've all had those putting days where it "feels" like everything you hit rolls in. AND... we've all had those days where it "feels" like you can't make a thing.  My best advice is get putting lessons. ... My second best advice is get data.  Unless you just want to get a new putter. Than go ahead. I love shiny things and I'd be the last person to claim I have never replaced a club that was working fine just because I wanted to get a new one. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...