Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7419 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I was just scooching around the internet on a holiday-weekend morning, and I saw that a club I belong to is officially listed at one prominent golf course site as having 61-70 bunkers. Which made me chuckle, because I've visited them all, I'm sure, but I never thought to count them, either. I can just see the caddies or a junior pro in the pro shop debating how many they had and saying, "61-70," to the person asking the question. What I really suspect is someone filled out a profile and marked the "61-70" box for that question.

So I went out to count them today.

Pretty dang accurate description, depending on how you count them...

Because...I then fluttered online to a pretty good course my family built. They had "71-80." on the website. But I know the exact number and it's less. So I had to walk that and count.

They counted all the "grass bunkers" on the list. Which isn't a bad idea. I watched the course get designed, built and produce a USGA champion, and I know that those "bunkers" with the really long grass are meant to penalize you just as much as the sand.

So that's why I ask, what's a bunker?

I think I've decided it's any deep impression on the course's regular lines of play that tries to penalize you for being there. I'm sure there's a more technical definition, but that's just what I came away with after thinking about, and walking, both courses today.

cy

p.s. And it was really cool because I shot below net-par on both courses. I've never pulled that double before. I usually just get too tired out on the course I played second. Or I just plain sucked for several holes on one of the two, over 36 holes in a day. Nothing like a Monday holiday and playing some decent golf in great weather.

Posted

Straight from the USGA website:

Bunker
A “bunker’’ is a hazard consisting of a prepared area of ground, often a hollow, from which turf or soil has been removed and replaced with sand or the like.
Grass-covered ground bordering or within a bunker, including a stacked turf face (whether grass-covered or earthen), is not part of the bunker. A wall or lip of the bunker not covered with grass is part of the bunker.

The margin of a bunker extends vertically downward, but not upward. A ball is in a bunker when it lies in or any part of it touches the bunker.

My home course has exactly 41 bunkers

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

My home course is adding two fairway bunkers this year (one's done, one's nearly done). So that's +2 for me.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
Here is a rundown of the bunkers at my home course ( Tanglewood Championship ), site of the 1974 PGA.

#1: 1 fairway, 4 greenside
#2: 3 greenside
#3: 1 fairway, 3 greenside
#4: 1 fairway, 3 greenside
#5: 6 fairway, 4 greenside
#6: 4 fairway, 2 greenside
#7: 3 greenside
#8: 2 fairway, 3 greenside
#9: 2 fairway, 3 greenside
#10: 2 fairway, 4 greenside
#11: 4 fairway, 2 greenside
#12: 4 greenside
#13: 2 fairway, 4 greenside
#14: 2 fairway, 5 greenside
#15: 4 fairway, 4 greenside
#16: 5 greenside
#17: 3 fairway, 5 greenside
#18: 2 fairway, 3 greenside

That's right...100 bunkers in all. This is just from memory...

Robert Trent Jones must have had stock in sand at the time he designed it. I will say that a bunch of the traps never come into play though, but most of them are massive . For example, there are only two greenside bunkers on #11, but they run the entire lenght of the green on the left and right.

Erik, make sure your sand game is ready when you come down.

Fairways and Greens.

Dave
 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
My home course has 54. I had to list them in order to count them out - not because I thought you guys wanted a breakdown of my course. What this random "counting" does not indicate is the vast size of most of them. As I was counting them, I came to realize that my course has some ridiculously large bunkers surrounding many green in along the fairways. So in a nutshell, simply counting them doesn't do much to indicate what the course offers. You have to know their size as well.

1 - 1 fairway, 3 greenside
2 - 1 greenside
3 - 2 fairway, 1 greenside
4 - 3 greenside
5 - 2 greenside
6 - 2 fairway, 1 greenside
7 - 3 fairway, 1 greenside
8 - 2 fairway, 1 greenside
9 - 2 fairway, 1 greenside
10 - 1 fairway, 1 greenside
11 - 3 greenside
12 - 2 fairway
13 - 3 fairway, 3 greenside
14 - 1 fairway, 3 greenside
15 - 1 fairway, 3 greenside
16 - 1 greenside
17 - 1 fairway, 1 greenside
18 - 3 fairway, 2 greenside
total = 54
R7 Quad 9.5*
Cleveland Launcher 13*
Cleveland Launcher 15*
Ben Hogan C455 21*
MP-33 PW-4 iron MP Series 56* & 60*Corza MonzaProV1

  • Administrator
Posted
My Course

1 - 2F, 1G*
2 - 3G*
3 - 2G
4 - 4G*
5 - 2G
6 - 2G
7 - 2G
8 - 2G
9 - 2G (sensing a pattern yet?)

10 - 3G*
11 - 2G
12 - 3G
13 - 2G*
14 - 3G
15 - 3G*
16 - 1F, 2G*
17 - 1G*
18 - 2G

Total: 42. The fairway bunkers on the 16th and 1st holes are new within the past year.

The ones with asterisks were redone within the past four or five years. Prior to that, nearly every hole simply had one on the left and one on the right side of the green.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
My home course is being completely redone. I will say they added ALOT more bunkers and my god they are all VERY VERY intimidating. I have been working on my sand shots ALOT lately to prepare. I still have until around may until the course is done. I will tell you one thing, They made the course VERY VERY hard. Majority of the members honestly will not be able to play the course at all! I hope it may draw some younger members in to the course. I am the youngest member (21) that isnt associated with their parents.

Note: This thread is 7419 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.