Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Do clubs really help your game?


Note: This thread is 6476 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Folks

I am a novice to golf and although I have not attempted to calculate my Handicap, I think it is roughly at the moment around 28 or so from my last 3 scores on the same course.

My father had a spare set and I ended up just using them, They are not in a bad condition but they are quite old, maybe a good few years.

Would you recommend me to buy new clubs or wait a few rounds and see how the old clubs are fairing up? of course I wouldn't be buying a great few clubs like alot on here have, but there is a decent deal with Wilson's I've seen in the local sports shop for $250 which include a hybrid.

My main question is do new clubs affect your confidence on the course?

mucho thanks.


Posted
would you become a great painter if you got the best paint brush in the world?

  • Administrator
Posted
would you become a great painter if you got the best paint brush in the world?

Irrelevant analogy. Or backwards analogy. Whatever.

Skilled craftsman and artists both care a good deal about their tools, but good tools alone do not make you a skilled craftsman or artist. To the OP: not many specifics provided. I suggest you get fitted and see if the clubs are even close to appropriate for you. If they are, use them for awhile and start to develop your game. When you've broken 100 or 90 or something (you decide), evaluate your game, what clubs are available, and talk with your pro. He should be able to help since I'm going to assume you'll take a few lessons from him in the meantime.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
you got my point, so I think thats all that matters

Posted

Absolutely. I play much better with clubs than without.

But seriously... I agree with iacas: The club is a tool. To someone relatively unskilled, all tools may look pretty much alike. Some tools require more skill than others to use effectively. On the other hand, poor quality tools, or tools unsuited to one's skills are going to make the task more difficult, regardless of one's skill level.

Speaking from recent personal experience, I got fitted last month for a new set of irons. They have helped a great deal. My iron play is generally a lot better (of course the lessons I got over the Winter didn't hurt any either.) The only problem I'm having is getting used to the distances with the new clubs (about 10-15 yards longer than my old ones). The old set wasn't bad, but they were almost 20 years old. My irons are now the one part of my game where I'm most confident, and I attribute that to a large extent to the change in equipment.

Brad Eisenhauer

In my bag:
Driver: Callaway Hyper X 10° | Fairway Wood: GigaGolf PowerMax GX920 3W (15°) | Hybrid: GigaGolf PowerMax GX920 3 (20°)
Irons: Mizuno MX-25 4-PW | Wedges: GigaGolf Tradition SGS Black 52°, 56°, 60° | Putter: GigaGolf CenterCut Classic SP3

Ball: Titleist ProV1x or Bridgestone B330S


Posted
Irrelevant analogy. Or backwards analogy. Whatever.

Right on, besides until you have played for a bit you will not really have any idea of your strengths an weakness, or personal esthetic. You could well waste most of your money as entry to mid level clubs have little resale value.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Posted
You can get a good quality set of perimiter weighted irons, used or demos, for a bargain price. Get them at a shop where they can make sure the shaft flex, lie angles, grip size and club length are right for you. As Iacas suggested, develop some skills, and take some lessons to set you the right path.

The better you get, the more you will benefit from better clubs.

SubPar

Posted
I hit my O.G. Callaways very well but eventually outgrew them the better I became, now my 695's are absolutely fantastic and better than my old gardening tools.

I think to start, lessons would make more impact than the clubs.

Posted
i think they HELP. game improvement irons help you get the ball up and still have an ok result off of mishits thin and fat shots. but don't expect to go out and get all the same clubs, shafts, grips and balls that tiger uses and have the same result.

it's like any sport..the best gear doesn't mean you'll be the best....i think the clubs have to suit your swing type though.
DJ Yoshi
Official DJ: Rutgers Football
Boost Mobile Tour
In My Bag
HiBoreXL 9.5 White Board D63 Stiff Exotics CB2 5 Wood, Exotics CB3 3 Wood MP-60 5.5 Flighted Shafts 54 & Cleveland CG-10 60 Newport 2

Posted
I think clubs improve your game. I especially noticed it after I bought a new putter. I don't think clubs alone make you a good golfer, but they help. I don't think Callaway, Ping, and all of the other golf companies pay those club-making engineers the big bucks for nothing.

In my bag:

Driver: HiBore XL
3-Wood: Insight BUL
5-Wood: Insight BUL

4-Hybrid: Taylormade Burner Rescue

Irons: Big Bertha 2006, 5-PW

GW: CG11 50*

SW: CG11 54* (bent to 55*)

LW: CG11 60*

Putter: Odyssey D.A.R.T White Ice


Posted
...I don't think Callaway, Ping, and all of the other golf companies pay those club-making engineers the big bucks for nothing.

No. They pay them to come out every year with more expensive, goofy looking new models that are "the best clubs ever" so they can keep selling to the same customers over and over. It's like a license to print money.

SubPar

Posted
Hi Folks,

again much thanks for the replies. I can drive, putt and chip reasonably well but major disapointment at the moment or last season (still haven't got out yet) is my 3-4-5-6 Irons and getting loft in them, I am going to go practising with friends and play 9 holes and see how they go
so i was basically not looking at a new set just a 3iron or so

thanks again

Posted

no, clubs don't make that much difference. The companies make you think that they will help as thats the job of their PR department. But truthfully, however, if you can hit it anyway and can play, the right equipment can make you even better- but, if you couldnt hit it in the first place, all the technology in the world will not help you.

If i had my way, id force all new starters to play with hickory shafts and Dunlop 65s to encourage them to learn how to hit the ball properly !


Posted
Go to a club pro or someone who can evaluate your swing....someone who can honestly tell you if clubs will help your game at this point. You might be able to get by with what you are using until you get a bit better, then some updated equipment (made withinthe last 5 yers or so) will probably help. You probably don't need the latest driver irons and such just made in the last year or so, most of us don't!

Driver: Titleist 905T 11.5*

Hybrids: Cleveland HALO Hybrids 19*, 22*

Irons Snake Eyes Python O/S irons (I carry 5,7,9,A irons)

Wedges: Adams Tom Watson SW 56* (sometimes carry Adams Tom Watson LW 60*)

Putter: Odyssey Dual Force 2 Rossie or Tommy Armour EFT Series Model 6


Posted
There is a great deal of advantage in today's drivers as opposed to the drivers and fairway woods of the past. As far as irons go.. eh. I play forged blades (which I wouldn't recommend for a beginner) I say a forged piece of metal is a forged piece of metal. That's why I was playing a set of clubs from '72 last year. I gave them up because the shafts weren't right for me. I think a properly matched shaft is going to do one more good with a set of irons than the heads themselves.

Callaway RazrFit Extreme 9.5 w/Project X 6.5
Callaway XHot Pro 15* 3Wood w/Project X 6.5
Callaway XTour 18* 2h w/S300
Callaway XHot Pro 4/5 irons w/S300
Callaway XForged III 5-PW irons w/S300
Callaway Forged 52*/58* Wedges
Odyssey 7 Versa 90
Callaway Hex Black Tour


Posted
Went to a driving range here, I'm out of town and borrowed 2 clubs from the range Nike slingshots (7iron and 9)and felt a great improvement in my shots,

Note: This thread is 6476 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.